not fedora, redhat.

[lee johnson]

Roadrunner, the number one Supercomputer 
<http://www.top500.org/system/9485> in the world <

from: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Overview

This is not true , it says  redhat, please update.

thank you
lee

[Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams]

On Fri, 2008-12-12 at 10:07 -0800, g.leej wrote:
>  Roadrunner, the number one Supercomputer 
>  <http://www.top500.org/system/9485> in the world <
>  
>  from: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Overview
>  
>  This is not true , it says  redhat, please update.
>  
>  thank you
>  lee 
Page 29 of http://www.lanl.gov/orgs/hpc/roadrunner/pdfs/Koch%20-%
20Roadrunner%20Overview/RR%20Seminar%20-%20System%20Overview.pdf says
Fedora, and I'm more inclined to believe LANL.

-- 
Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams <ivazqueznet(a)gmail.com&gt;

[lee johnson]

Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams wrote:
>  On Fri, 2008-12-12 at 10:07 -0800, g.leej wrote:
>    
> > Roadrunner, the number one Supercomputer 
> > <http://www.top500.org/system/9485> in the world <
> >
> > from: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Overview
> >
> > This is not true , it says  redhat, please update.
> >
> > thank you
> > lee
> >     
>
>  Page 29 of http://www.lanl.gov/orgs/hpc/roadrunner/pdfs/Koch%20-%
>  20Roadrunner%20Overview/RR%20Seminar%20-%20System%20Overview.pdf says
>  Fedora, and I'm more inclined to believe LANL.
>
>     
Fedora Linux (RHEL possible) < whatever that means,,possible ?
anyway,,I went back to original website, and its NOT clear at all by 
just visiting there that fedora is  involved.you need to update the link 
then to show it more clearly if indeed fedora is still the case and not 
RHEL.

cheers
lee

[Rahul Sundaram]

g.leej wrote:

> >   
>  Fedora Linux (RHEL possible) < whatever that means,,possible ?
>  anyway,,I went back to original website, and its NOT clear at all by 
>  just visiting there that fedora is  involved.you need to update the link 
>  then to show it more clearly if indeed fedora is still the case and not 
>  RHEL. 
It is actually both. There are a number of material online for further 
information and providing them all in a overview wouldn't be appropriate.

Rahul