This doesn't look good. Can we improve this? https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-websites-list/2007-February/date.html Regards,
On Friday 23 February 2007, Thomas Chung wrote:
This doesn't look good. Can we improve this? https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-websites-list/2007-February/date.htm
Short answer: No.
Long answer: Even if we could, which we can't, that's not really in the spirit of the archives.
On 2/23/07, Patrick W. Barnes nman64@n-man.com wrote:
On Friday 23 February 2007, Thomas Chung wrote:
This doesn't look good. Can we improve this? https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-websites-list/2007-February/date.html
Short answer: No.
Long answer: Even if we could, which we can't, that's not really in the spirit of the archives.
I'm referring to posts like https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-websites-list/2007-February/msg00001.... Do we really need to post this type of messages to our archive? Regards,
On Friday 23 February 2007, Thomas Chung wrote:
On 2/23/07, Patrick W. Barnes nman64@n-man.com wrote:
I'm referring to posts like https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-websites-list/2007-February/msg00001 .html Do we really need to post this type of messages to our archive?
From among posted messages, we cannot filter what hits the archives and what does not, so the real question becomes "do we need the CVS messages posted to the list?" In long-past discussions, the answer has been "yes." If you feel the time has come to review the issue, let's hear your thoughts.
On Sat, 2007-02-24 at 00:50 -0600, Patrick W. Barnes wrote:
On Friday 23 February 2007, Thomas Chung wrote:
On 2/23/07, Patrick W. Barnes nman64@n-man.com wrote:
I'm referring to posts like https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-websites-list/2007-February/msg00001 .html Do we really need to post this type of messages to our archive?
From among posted messages, we cannot filter what hits the archives and what does not, so the real question becomes "do we need the CVS messages posted to the list?" In long-past discussions, the answer has been "yes." If you feel the time has come to review the issue, let's hear your thoughts.
I'm assuming the problem is the bulky and unattractive headers caused by CVS commits?
websites@lists.fedoraproject.org
-
Patrick W. Barnes -
Paul W. Frields -
Thomas Chung