Additions to fedora.css

[Toshio Kuratomi]

I'd like to make this change to fedora.css.  This adds some CSS that is
generally useful for Fedora Web Apps.  None of them were defined already
in fedora.css.  individual web apps are probably already overriding
these with their own css but over time we can remove those from the
individual apps and rely on the fedora.css more.

* Note: The three icons for the flash messages info.png, success.png,
and important.png aren't very good.  A real graphic designer could
probably do a lot better :-)

Should I do this or are there drawbacks?

-Toshio

[Ricky Zhou]

On 2009-02-08 11:59:35 AM, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
> I'd like to make this change to fedora.css.  This adds some CSS that is
> generally useful for Fedora Web Apps.  None of them were defined already
> in fedora.css.  individual web apps are probably already overriding
> these with their own css but over time we can remove those from the
> individual apps and rely on the fedora.css more.
> Note: The three icons for the flash messages info.png, success.png,
>
> and important.png aren't very good.  A real graphic designer could
> probably do a lot better :-)
>
> Should I do this or are there drawbacks?

Looks good to me, feel free to apply to the web group if you're not
already in it.

Thanks,
Ricky

[Máirín Duffy]

Hey Toshio!

----- Original Message ----
> From: Toshio Kuratomi 
> To: For maintainers and developers of all formal Fedora websites. 
> Sent: Sunday, February 8, 2009 2:59:35 PM
> Subject: Additions to fedora.css
>
> I'd like to make this change to fedora.css.  This adds some CSS that is
> generally useful for Fedora Web Apps.  None of them were defined already
> in fedora.css.  individual web apps are probably already overriding
> these with their own css but over time we can remove those from the
> individual apps and rely on the fedora.css more.

These changes look good!
> Note: The three icons for the flash messages info.png, success.png,
>
> and important.png aren't very good.  A real graphic designer could
> probably do a lot better :-)

:) I can try to get you some better ones, but don't wait on it. I have it on my to-do queue.

~m