Re: WIki and kindofblue

[Thomas Chung]

On 2/22/07, Michael Greifenkamp  wrote:
> My name is Michael Greifenkamp and I work at the University of
> Illinois.  I signed up earlier this week to "volunteer" for the
> Fedora "websites" project.  I think I'm all set in the account
> system, but I don't yet have editing rights (it still won't let me
> edit my own page).

Hi Michael,
Please contact me in private for adding you to EditGroup.
Regards,

WIki and kindofblue

[Mike McGrath]

Thomas Chung wrote:
> On 2/22/07, Michael Greifenkamp  wrote:
> > My name is Michael Greifenkamp and I work at the University of
> > Illinois.  I signed up earlier this week to "volunteer" for the
> > Fedora "websites" project.  I think I'm all set in the account
> > system, but I don't yet have editing rights (it still won't let me
> > edit my own page).
>
> Hi Michael,
> Please contact me in private for adding you to EditGroup.
> Regards,

Ok, we're in better shape. many of the bullets look right and I've added 
an attach link to the theme.  Can someone look at why the edit pages 
don't work right?  Michael, interested?

-Mike

WIki and kindofblue

[Michael Greifenkamp]

Sure.  But I must admit that I'm not sure what isn't working. I was 
just able to edit the Web sites  "contributors" page without a 
problem (other than adding my name in the wrong format the first 
time).  Is it just specific pages that aren't working correctly?  And 
if so, can you give me an example?

Thanks!  And thanks all for letting me be a part of this!  (I'll try 
not to screw anything up...)

Mike
> Ok, we're in better shape. many of the bullets look right and I've 
> added an attach link to the theme.  Can someone look at why the edit 
> pages don't work right?  Michael, interested?
>    -Mike
>
> --
> Fedora-websites-list mailing list
> [e-mail]
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-websites-list

WIki and kindofblue

[Thomas Chung]

On 2/22/07, Mike McGrath  wrote:
> Ok, we're in better shape. many of the bullets look right and I've added
> an attach link to the theme.

I still think there is a minor issue with "line spacing" with bullets.
For example, if you look at this page, you'll notice a slight
differences in line spacing between the one with accepted and the one
not been accepted.
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Distribution/FreeMedia/FC6DVD/February
Regards,

WIki and kindofblue

[Michael Greifenkamp]

Add

margin-bottom: 1.3em;

to #page ul li {

in "screen.css"

(we could probably add line-height: 1.3em; as well, just in case.....)

and that should fix the bullet alignment problem.

--Mike
> On 2/22/07, Mike McGrath  wrote:
> > Ok, we're in better shape. many of the bullets look right and I've added
> > an attach link to the theme.
>
> I still think there is a minor issue with "line spacing" with bullets.
> For example, if you look at this page, you'll notice a slight
> differences in line spacing between the one with accepted and the one
> not been accepted.
> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Distribution/FreeMedia/FC6DVD/February
> Regards,
> --
> Thomas Chung
> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/ThomasChung
>
> --
> Fedora-websites-list mailing list
> [e-mail]
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-websites-list

WIki and kindofblue

[Karsten Wade]

On Fri, 2007-02-23 at 07:55 -0600, Michael Greifenkamp wrote:
> Add
>
> margin-bottom: 1.3em;
>
> to #page ul li {
>
> in "screen.css"
>
> (we could probably add line-height: 1.3em; as well, just in case.....)
>
> and that should fix the bullet alignment problem.

Is that the fix to what I report here?

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=230511

I tried to use those fixes (using Web Developer extension for Firefox to
edit the CSS on the live page.)  I didn't have any luck, but that
doesn't mean anything.

- Karsten

WIki and kindofblue

[Thomas Chung]

On 3/1/07, Karsten Wade  wrote:
> On Fri, 2007-02-23 at 07:55 -0600, Michael Greifenkamp wrote:
> > Add
> >
> > margin-bottom: 1.3em;
> >
> > to #page ul li {
> >
> > in "screen.css"
> >
> > (we could probably add line-height: 1.3em; as well, just in case.....)
> >
> > and that should fix the bullet alignment problem.
>
> Is that the fix to what I report here?
>
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=230511
>
> I tried to use those fixes (using Web Developer extension for Firefox to
> edit the CSS on the live page.)  I didn't have any luck, but that
> doesn't mean anything.
> Karsten

I think the issue I'm having is different than yours.
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/ThomasChung/NumberedTest
Notice if I use numbered items only, it converts properly but if I mix
with any bullet you get all bullets and ignore rest of numbered items.

WIki and kindofblue

[Michael Greifenkamp]

I need to go back and look at the entire css file again, but I'm 
guessing that the current problem (that I could still see on your 
example pages) is very closely related.

The problem is that list items that are non-linked don't have a 
margin set for them because the margin is set in the paragraph tag. 
For whatever reason, list items that aren't links are just 
<li>item</i> but list items that have links are <li><p><a 
href="">item</a></p></li>.  The enclosing paragraph tags of the items 
that have links make the formatting for those list items different.

My suggestion, without overstepping my bounds of course, is to fix 
whatever it is that OMITS the <p></p> tags on the list items that 
aren't links, so that they appear as <li><p>item</p></li>.

Otherwise, it should be able to be fixed by making the attributes for 
ordered and unordered list items match the attributes for the 
paragraph tag, so that when the paragraph tag is omitted it still 
formats it the same way (which seems sloppy to me, but I'm new here. 
:)

Mike
> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
>    protocol="application/pgp-signature";
>    boundary="=-ijQRB2fdPCDUEzaqwoi3"
>
> On Fri, 2007-02-23 at 07:55 -0600, Michael Greifenkamp wrote:
> > Add
> >
> > margin-bottom: 1.3em;
> >
> > to #page ul li {
> >
> > in "screen.css"
> >
> > (we could probably add line-height: 1.3em; as well, just in case.....)
> >
> > and that should fix the bullet alignment problem.
>
> Is that the fix to what I report here?
>
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=230511
>
> I tried to use those fixes (using Web Developer extension for Firefox to
> edit the CSS on the live page.)  I didn't have any luck, but that
> doesn't mean anything.
> Karsten
>
> --
> Karsten Wade, RHCE, 108 Editor    ^     Fedora Documentation Project
>  Sr. Developer Relations Mgr.     |  fedoraproject.org/wiki/DocsProject
>    quaid.108.redhat.com           |          gpg key: AD0E0C41
> ////////////////////////////////// \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\
>
> Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc
> Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part
> Attachment converted: Graceland:signature 11.asc (    /    ) (0071C1C1)
>
> Fedora-websites-list mailing list
> [e-mail]
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-websites-list