how did you get into my computer?

[Susan Marshall]

I do not like the fact that you intercept my requests.

I need an uninstall for you product.

[Ricky Zhou]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Susan Marshall wrote:
> I do not like the fact that you intercept my requests.
>
> I need an uninstall for you product.

Hi!  We have no control over your computer, and we do not intercept your
requests.  If contacted us because you had seen a page like the one at
http://publictest1.fedora.redhat.com/, please read
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/ServerTestPage for more information and
the explanation.

Thanks,
Ricky
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux)
>
> iD8DBQFGwLAwZBKKLMyvSE4RAr/nAKCVbjH/nmPdiNaWO9VmfSH8wKlQ3wCdEK/z
> a9CnUIDdau0eryuoBIGBYJ8=
> =P3hU
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

[Pramod Venugopal]

Is this someone trying to troll from the centos story about the city of
tuttle, OK 's website?
http://www.centos.org/modules/news/article.php?storyid=127

On 8/13/07, Ricky Zhou  wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Susan Marshall wrote:
> > I do not like the fact that you intercept my requests.
> >
> > I need an uninstall for you product.
>
> Hi!  We have no control over your computer, and we do not intercept your
> requests.  If contacted us because you had seen a page like the one at
> http://publictest1.fedora.redhat.com/, please read
> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/ServerTestPage for more information and
> the explanation.
>
> Thanks,
> Ricky
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux)
>
> iD8DBQFGwLAwZBKKLMyvSE4RAr/nAKCVbjH/nmPdiNaWO9VmfSH8wKlQ3wCdEK/z
> a9CnUIDdau0eryuoBIGBYJ8=
> =P3hU
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
> --
> Fedora-websites-list mailing list
> [e-mail]
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-websites-list

[Arthur Pemberton]

On 8/13/07, Ricky Zhou  wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Susan Marshall wrote:
> > I do not like the fact that you intercept my requests.
> >
> > I need an uninstall for you product.
>
> Hi!  We have no control over your computer, and we do not intercept your
> requests.  If contacted us because you had seen a page like the one at
> http://publictest1.fedora.redhat.com/, please read
> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/ServerTestPage for more information and
> the explanation.
>
> Thanks,
> Ricky

Listen. I know I am not a proper participant on this list, neither am
I much of a people person. But there are only two scenarios with this
email.

1. the person is just playing around
2. the person lacks the most basic of comprehension skills

It seems to me that in neither case does the person deserve a
response. I've read the test page, it is almost depressingly clear.

[Thomas Chung]

On 8/13/07, Ricky Zhou  wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Susan Marshall wrote:
> > I do not like the fact that you intercept my requests.
> >
> > I need an uninstall for you product.
>
> Hi!  We have no control over your computer, and we do not intercept your
> requests.  If contacted us because you had seen a page like the one at
> http://publictest1.fedora.redhat.com/, please read
> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/ServerTestPage for more information and
> the explanation.
>
> Thanks,
> Ricky

Hi Ricky,
Did you include "Susan" in your original email?
Regards,

[Ricky Zhou]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Thomas Chung wrote:
> Hi Ricky,
> Did you include "Susan" in your original email?
> Regards,

I actually forgot to- thanks for the reminder (I just resent it to
include her).  By the way, I've noticed a slightly different behavior
with Reply-to headers in other mailman mailing lists.  Is this something
we could possibly change in the configuration?

Thanks,
Ricky
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux)
>
> iD8DBQFGwMgNZBKKLMyvSE4RAtOaAKCU0s3icJynEWf4Ksfa9b7+oMkxxQCghadw
> fy0nE9KQKTasNtY6ln1dqtc=
> =SXjx
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

[Thomas Chung]

On 8/13/07, Ricky Zhou  wrote:
> By the way, I've noticed a slightly different behavior
> with Reply-to headers in other mailman mailing lists.  Is this something
> we could possibly change in the configuration?

It's currently set to:
Should any existing Reply-To: header found in the original message be
stripped? No
Where are replies to list messages directed? This list
Explicit Reply-To: header. None

It's pretty much same configuration as fedora-marketing-list.
For any configuration changes, we need to discuss with other list
administrators.

Regards,

[Ricky Zhou]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Thomas Chung wrote:
> It's currently set to:
> Should any existing Reply-To: header found in the original message be
> stripped? No
> Where are replies to list messages directed? This list
> Explicit Reply-To: header. None

OK, this setting seems to be so that both "reply" and "reply to all"
send mail back to the list.  Normally, mailman makes sends a reply-to
header with the original sender's e-mail (as mentioned at
http://staff.imsa.edu/~ckolar/mailman/mailman-administration-v2.html,
poster is usually recommended).  Based on the somewhat specialized
purpose of this list (handling webmaster@fp.o), it seems like an
appropriate option to set (hopefully, everybody's in the habit of using
"reply to all" on mailing lists already).

List admins: What do you think about this idea?

Thanks,
Ricky
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux)
>
> iD8DBQFGwP27ZBKKLMyvSE4RAiWAAJ9FX/6kxmD/vG/egogMxgJFS8ML3ACglXYm
> 5nBCYJfDxIEeqlJDyXsrCwQ=
> =RaN9
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----