[fedora-websites] #366: cloud/atomic: Installer ISO should be more prominent

[fedora-badges]

#366: cloud/atomic: Installer ISO should be more prominent
----------------------+-----------------------
  Reporter:  walters  |      Owner:  webmaster
      Type:  defect   |     Status:  new
  Priority:  major    |  Milestone:
 Component:  General  |   Keywords:
Blocked By:           |   Blocking:
----------------------+-----------------------
 In https://getfedora.org/en/cloud/download/atomic.html the installer ISO
 is off to the side.

 We should put it inline with the rest of the content; it works similarly
 to other installation media.

-- 
Ticket URL: <https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-websites/ticket/366>
fedora-websites <https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Websites>
Fedora Website Team's Trac instance

[fedora-badges]

#366: cloud/atomic: Installer ISO should be more prominent
---------------------+------------------------
 Reporter:  walters  |       Owner:  webmaster
     Type:  defect   |      Status:  new
 Priority:  major    |   Milestone:
Component:  General  |  Resolution:
 Keywords:           |  Blocked By:
 Blocking:           |
---------------------+------------------------

Comment (by mattdm):

 As I recall, that was because the installer version doesn't get the same
 automated testing. There's actually supposed to be some text there saying
 so (and the lack thereof is probably my fault.) However, Adam Williamson
 just posted to the cloud list about actually _doing_ automated testing of
 that using OpenQA, so that might soon be a non-issue.

-- 
Ticket URL: <https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-websites/ticket/366#comment:1>
fedora-websites <https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Websites>
Fedora Website Team's Trac instance

[fedora-badges]

#366: cloud/atomic: Installer ISO should be more prominent
---------------------+------------------------
 Reporter:  walters  |       Owner:  webmaster
     Type:  defect   |      Status:  new
 Priority:  major    |   Milestone:
Component:  General  |  Resolution:
 Keywords:           |  Blocked By:
 Blocking:           |
---------------------+------------------------

Comment (by jzb):

 Replying to [comment:1 mattdm]:
>  As I recall, that was because the installer version doesn't get
> the same 
 automated testing. There's actually supposed to be some text there
saying
 so (and the lack thereof is probably my fault.) However, Adam Williamson
 just posted to the cloud list about actually _doing_ automated testing of
 that using OpenQA, so that might soon be a non-issue.

 So - should we be tracking this over in Cloud to ensure there's reasonable
 testing of the ISO, and then come back with a patch?

-- 
Ticket URL: <https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-websites/ticket/366#comment:2>
fedora-websites <https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Websites>
Fedora Website Team's Trac instance

[fedora-badges]

#366: cloud/atomic: Installer ISO should be more prominent
---------------------+------------------------
 Reporter:  walters  |       Owner:  webmaster
     Type:  defect   |      Status:  new
 Priority:  major    |   Milestone:
Component:  General  |  Resolution:
 Keywords:           |  Blocked By:
 Blocking:           |
---------------------+------------------------

Comment (by mattdm):

 Replying to [comment:2 jzb]:
>  So - should we be tracking this over in Cloud to ensure there's
 reasonable testing of the ISO, and then come back with a patch?

 That seems like the right plan, yeah.

-- 
Ticket URL: <https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-websites/ticket/366#comment:3>
fedora-websites <https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Websites>
Fedora Website Team's Trac instance

[fedora-badges]

#366: cloud/atomic: Installer ISO should be more prominent
---------------------+------------------------
 Reporter:  walters  |       Owner:  webmaster
     Type:  defect   |      Status:  new
 Priority:  major    |   Milestone:
Component:  General  |  Resolution:
 Keywords:           |  Blocked By:
 Blocking:           |
---------------------+------------------------

Comment (by jzb):

 This just in - apparently we're not updating for the new ISOs yet either.

-- 
Ticket URL: <https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-websites/ticket/366#comment:4>
fedora-websites <https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Websites>
Fedora Website Team's Trac instance

[fedora-badges]

#366: cloud/atomic: Installer ISO should be more prominent
---------------------+------------------------
 Reporter:  walters  |       Owner:  webmaster
     Type:  defect   |      Status:  new
 Priority:  major    |   Milestone:
Component:  General  |  Resolution:
 Keywords:           |  Blocked By:
 Blocking:           |
---------------------+------------------------

Comment (by robyduck):

 So what should be the plan for this? I feel no image on the right is just
 ''off to the side'', that's the wrong interpretation and wouldn't
make
 sense to any image (also WS and Server have images there).

 The images on the right are important as well, but let me unproperly call
 them 'alternative images', means they are not advertised by the WG as main
 images (as base and atomic for example) but we still want them visible on
 the main download page. Otherwise the right columns could also be dropped
 completely.

-- 
Ticket URL: <https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-websites/ticket/366#comment:5>
fedora-websites <https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Websites>
Fedora Website Team's Trac instance

[fedora-badges]

#366: cloud/atomic: Installer ISO should be more prominent
---------------------+------------------------
 Reporter:  walters  |       Owner:  webmaster
     Type:  defect   |      Status:  new
 Priority:  major    |   Milestone:
Component:  General  |  Resolution:
 Keywords:           |  Blocked By:
 Blocking:           |
---------------------+------------------------

Comment (by jzb):

 Replying to [comment:5 robyduck]:
>  So what should be the plan for this? I feel no image on the right is
 just ''off to the side'', that's the wrong interpretation and
wouldn't
 make sense to any image (also WS and Server have images there).

 I'm not sure what you mean here, exactly.

 The plan should be:

 * Leave as-is briefly.
 * Ensure we're testing the ISO image
 * Move the ISO / bare metal image to the main list so it's at parity with
 the other image formats.

>  The images on the right are important as well, but let me unproperly
 call them 'alternative images', means they are not advertised by the WG as
 main images (as base and atomic for example) but we still want them
 visible on the main download page. Otherwise the right columns could also
 be dropped completely.

 We totally want the bare metal as a "main" image.

-- 
Ticket URL: <https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-websites/ticket/366#comment:6>
fedora-websites <https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Websites>
Fedora Website Team's Trac instance

[fedora-badges]

#366: cloud/atomic: Installer ISO should be more prominent
---------------------+------------------------
 Reporter:  walters  |       Owner:  webmaster
     Type:  defect   |      Status:  new
 Priority:  major    |   Milestone:
Component:  General  |  Resolution:
 Keywords:           |  Blocked By:
 Blocking:           |
---------------------+------------------------

Comment (by ralph):

 Some info:  It looks like we *are* producing the ISO image, but it is not
 receiving much of any testing.

 A simple patch to update the link to point to the two-week artifact is
 attached.  But we don't necessarily want to apply it yet until we come to
 an agreement about what to do.

-- 
Ticket URL: <https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-websites/ticket/366#comment:7>
fedora-websites <https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Websites>
Fedora Website Team's Trac instance