Possibly Inaccurate page

[Arthur Pemberton]

I could be confused, but this page seems to be inaccurate, or at least
misleading:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Firefox2

[Matthias Clasen]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Arthur Pemberton wrote:
> I could be confused, but this page seems to be inaccurate, or at least
> misleading:
> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Firefox2

Agreed- good catch- this seems to be FC6-specific, although the page
doesn't say so.

Rahul- I notice that you moved this information from Bugs/FC6Common to a
separate page a while back.  Do you think moving it back in (making it
clear that it's FC6-specific) would clear this up?

Thanks,
Ricky
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux)
>
> iD8DBQFGtgdFZBKKLMyvSE4RAj/6AJ9IVEmbl2ySF9QpXt9Ka5w22bCF8QCg5whR
> TcrxAsW/0WcfuhiGIhAa8C0=
> =ELxI
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

[Rahul Sundaram]

Ricky Zhou wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Arthur Pemberton wrote:
> > I could be confused, but this page seems to be inaccurate, or at least
> > misleading:
> > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Firefox2
>
> Agreed- good catch- this seems to be FC6-specific, although the page
> doesn't say so.
>
> Rahul- I notice that you moved this information from Bugs/FC6Common to a
> separate page a while back.  Do you think moving it back in (making it
> clear that it's FC6-specific) would clear this up?

I wrote it in the bugs page and moved it out because not shipping a 
particular version of a package cannot be classified as a bug. I have 
added a prominent note on top now to avoid any confusion.

Rahul

[Arthur Pemberton]

On 8/5/07, Rahul Sundaram  wrote:
> Ricky Zhou wrote:
> > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> > Hash: SHA1
> >
> > Arthur Pemberton wrote:
> > > I could be confused, but this page seems to be inaccurate, or at least
> > > misleading:
> > > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Firefox2
> >
> > Agreed- good catch- this seems to be FC6-specific, although the page
> > doesn't say so.
> >
> > Rahul- I notice that you moved this information from Bugs/FC6Common to a
> > separate page a while back.  Do you think moving it back in (making it
> > clear that it's FC6-specific) would clear this up?
>
> I wrote it in the bugs page and moved it out because not shipping a
> particular version of a package cannot be classified as a bug. I have
> added a prominent note on top now to avoid any confusion.
>
> Rahul

Thanks for clearing that up.