legal pages moved [qa]

[Karsten Wade]

Please help QA these pages:

http://fedoraproject.org/legal/

They are the same content as:

http://rhold.fedoraproject.org/About/legal/trademarks/guidelines/

... but I did have to touch the content in ways that seemed clear and
obvious.  I updated the copyright to 2007, and removed the word "Core"
wherever it appeared.  Other than that, zero changes to the content.

OK, that was just painful enough for me to start kicking down some doors
for a CMS.  Still, these are needed canonical pages and they *cannot*
stay on something called 'rhold'.

Once we think these are golden, we can link them from here:

http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Legal/TrademarkGuidelines

I still like the Wiki friendlier page in front of things, and having a
friendly page as the target in all footers.  Still, I think that
canonical URL should be fp.o/legal.  But that can wait until the CMS. :)

- Karsten
-- 
   Karsten Wade, 108 Editor       ^     Fedora Documentation Project 
 Sr. Developer Relations Mgr.     |  fedoraproject.org/wiki/DocsProject
   quaid.108.redhat.com           |          gpg key: AD0E0C41
////////////////////////////////// \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\

[Thomas Chung]

On 6/25/07, Karsten Wade <kwade(a)redhat.com&gt; wrote:
>  Please help QA these pages:
>
>  http://fedoraproject.org/legal/
>
>  They are the same content as:
>
>  http://rhold.fedoraproject.org/About/legal/trademarks/guidelines/
>
>  ... but I did have to touch the content in ways that seemed clear and
>  obvious.  I updated the copyright to 2007, and removed the word "Core"
>  wherever it appeared.  Other than that, zero changes to the content.
>
>  OK, that was just painful enough for me to start kicking down some doors
>  for a CMS.  Still, these are needed canonical pages and they *cannot*
>  stay on something called 'rhold'.
>
>  Once we think these are golden, we can link them from here:
>
>  http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Legal/TrademarkGuidelines
>
>  I still like the Wiki friendlier page in front of things, and having a
>  friendly page as the target in all footers.  Still, I think that
>  canonical URL should be fp.o/legal.  But that can wait until the CMS. :) 
Great job Karsten.
Thank you so much.
Now, are we waiting for approval by Red Hat Legal?
Regards,
-- 
Thomas Chung
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/ThomasChung

[Karsten Wade]

On Mon, 2007-06-25 at 14:57 -0700, Thomas Chung wrote:

>  Now, are we waiting for approval by Red Hat Legal? 
Good question.  I made zero substantive changes to the pages.  IMO, we
should link in the new pages and drop a note to legal that we've moved
the pages to a canonical URL.  The rest is styling, which doesn't count.
Uh, I think.

Maybe this is a f-a-b question?

- Karsten
-- 
   Karsten Wade, 108 Editor       ^     Fedora Documentation Project 
 Sr. Developer Relations Mgr.     |  fedoraproject.org/wiki/DocsProject
   quaid.108.redhat.com           |          gpg key: AD0E0C41
////////////////////////////////// \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\

[Thomas Chung]

On 6/26/07, Karsten Wade <kwade(a)redhat.com&gt; wrote:
>  On Mon, 2007-06-25 at 14:57 -0700, Thomas Chung wrote:
>
>  > Now, are we waiting for approval by Red Hat Legal?
>
>  Good question.  I made zero substantive changes to the pages.  IMO, we
>  should link in the new pages and drop a note to legal that we've moved
>  the pages to a canonical URL.  The rest is styling, which doesn't count.
>  Uh, I think.
>
>  Maybe this is a f-a-b question? 
We better check with Max. :)
-- 
Thomas Chung
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/ThomasChung

[Karsten Wade]

On Tue, 2007-06-26 at 11:13 -0700, Thomas Chung wrote:

>  We better check with Max. :) 
Max's email got dropped, here it is:

<mspevack>
We don't need legal approval just to move pages around, or make cosmetic
changes.  Unless we're doing some major major content changes, I think
we just need to let them know "here's the URL for all the Fedora legal
stuff, in case you need it".
</mspevack>

- Karsten
-- 
   Karsten Wade, 108 Editor       ^     Fedora Documentation Project 
 Sr. Developer Relations Mgr.     |  fedoraproject.org/wiki/DocsProject
   quaid.108.redhat.com           |          gpg key: AD0E0C41
////////////////////////////////// \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\

[Eric Kerby]

On Jun 25, 2007, at 4:49 PM, Karsten Wade wrote:

>  Please help QA these pages:
>
>  http://fedoraproject.org/legal/
>  
Are you asking us to proof the text, or graphical/layout errors?

So far, I noticed:

The Trademark Guidelines page ( http://fedoraproject.org/legal/ 
trademarks/guidelines/ ) has Fedora™Fedora™ at the top.

The right side of the footer in quite a few of the pages, like http:// 
fedoraproject.org/legal/licenses/, has a black bar.  It looks like  
this is caused when the #bottom div is placed inside the #wrapper div.

----
Eric Kerby
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/EricKerby

[Karsten Wade]

On Mon, 2007-06-25 at 18:21 -0400, Eric Kerby wrote:
>  On Jun 25, 2007, at 4:49 PM, Karsten Wade wrote:
>  
>  > Please help QA these pages:
>  >
>  > http://fedoraproject.org/legal/
>  >
>  
>  Are you asking us to proof the text, or graphical/layout errors? 
Yes, all of that.  Sorry, I should have run a search for 'core' myself;
otherwise there wasn't a need to proof the text.  But it can't hurt to
look at the text.

>  So far, I noticed:
>  
>  The Trademark Guidelines page ( http://fedoraproject.org/legal/ 
>  trademarks/guidelines/ ) has Fedora™Fedora™ at the top. 
Oops, copy/paste cruft, thanks.

>  The right side of the footer in quite a few of the pages, like
> http:// 
>  fedoraproject.org/legal/licenses/, has a black bar.  It looks like  
>  this is caused when the #bottom div is placed inside the #wrapper div. 
Good fix, thanks; I'd seen that but hadn't sussed out what caused it.

- Karsten
-- 
   Karsten Wade, 108 Editor       ^     Fedora Documentation Project 
 Sr. Developer Relations Mgr.     |  fedoraproject.org/wiki/DocsProject
   quaid.108.redhat.com           |          gpg key: AD0E0C41
////////////////////////////////// \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\

[Rahul Sundaram]

Karsten Wade wrote:
>  Please help QA these pages:
>  
>  http://fedoraproject.org/legal/
>  
>  They are the same content as:
>  
>  http://rhold.fedoraproject.org/About/legal/trademarks/guidelines/
>  
>  ... but I did have to touch the content in ways that seemed clear and
>  obvious.  I updated the copyright to 2007, and removed the word "Core"
>  wherever it appeared.  Other than that, zero changes to the content.
>   
There is still "Core" mentioned in

http://fedoraproject.org/legal/licenses/eula.html
http://fedoraproject.org/legal/licenses/beta_eula.html

Rahul