Pasi,
I was trying to load the most recent 2.6.31-rc8 under Xen 3.4.1 ( via src.rpm) on F12 rawhide and got stack trace. Jeremy is saying that rc8 works ok under Xen Unstable. But, Libvirt 0.7.0-6 would obviously have dependencies on xen-3.4.1 packages. If i will port Xen 3.5 directly to F12 (F11) it might work with rc8, however Libvirt 0.7.0-6 will be most probably lost again. Libvirt 0.7.0-6 has been built for 3.4.1 Hypervisor ( in my understanding) . That's why i wrote if Xen 3.5 can load rc8, the easiest way to fix issue is to backport required Xen 3.5 CSs to xen-3.4.1-X(?).src.rpm and get it resolved before F12 November's release.
Boris
--- On Mon, 9/7/09, Pasi Kärkkäinen pasik@iki.fi wrote:
From: Pasi Kärkkäinen pasik@iki.fi Subject: Re: [Fedora-xen] Re: [Xen-devel] Re: Errors when build 2.6.31-rc8 To: "Boris Derzhavets" bderzhavets@yahoo.com Cc: "Xen-devel" xen-devel@lists.xensource.com, fedora-xen@redhat.com Date: Monday, September 7, 2009, 2:57 AM
On Sun, Sep 06, 2009 at 09:49:41PM -0700, Boris Derzhavets wrote:
As far as Xen 3.5 tarball will be officially released kernel supporting Dom0 should be JF's pvops kernel. When xen-3.5.0-X.src.rpm and updated libvirt ( next preview) will become available via F13 rawhide , F12 & F13 rawhide would be ready to go in text mode as 3.5 Xen Hosts with virt-install&virt-manager available via VNC connections. Why wait until Upstream merge ?
Uhm.. sorry I'm a bit confused. If I understood correctly you have a call trace on your pv_ops dom0 kernel?
Does that only happen with Xen 3.4.1 or what's the problem?
-- Pasi
Boris
--- On Sun, 9/6/09, Pasi Kärkkäinen pasik@iki.fi wrote:
From: Pasi Kärkkäinen pasik@iki.fi Subject: Re: [Fedora-xen] Re: [Xen-devel] Re: Errors when build 2.6.31-rc8 To: "Mr. Teo En Ming (Zhang Enming)" enming.teo@asiasoftsea.net Cc: bderzhavets@yahoo.com, "Xen-devel" xen-devel@lists.xensource.com, "Jeremy Fitzhardinge" jeremy@goop.org, fedora-xen@redhat.com Date: Sunday, September 6, 2009, 2:37 PM
On Mon, Sep 07, 2009 at 01:10:14AM +0800, Mr. Teo En Ming (Zhang Enming) wrote:
On 09/07/2009 01:04 AM, Boris Derzhavets wrote:
I believe, that some set of CSs from Xen 3.5 has to be included as patches into xen-3.4.1-3.src.rpm, in case if it causes by 3.4.1 Hypervisor. Otherwise , F12 release in November won't have suitable Dom0 kernel again. I would guess 2.6.31-rc6 at best.
Boris.
--- On *Sun, 9/6/09, Boris Derzhavets /bderzhavets@yahoo.com/* wrote:
From: Boris Derzhavets bderzhavets@yahoo.com Subject: [Fedora-xen] Re: [Xen-devel] Re: Errors when build 2.6.31-rc8 To: "Jeremy Fitzhardinge" jeremy@goop.org Cc: "Xen-devel" xen-devel@lists.xensource.com, fedora-xen@redhat.com Date: Sunday, September 6, 2009, 12:56 PM
Attempt to load 2.6-31-rc8 under Xen 3.4.1 , installed via xen-3.4.1-3.src.rpm along with libvirt(rawhide) , on top F12 rawhide. yum update gcc,glibc,kernel had been run.
Call trace:
usb_hc_died + ..... usb_add_hcd +..... usb_hcd_pci_probe + .... do_work_for_cpu + ..... local_pci_probe + ... do_work_for_cpu +..... kthread +..... child_rip+.... restore_args + ..... child_rip + ..... Code : . . . . . . . .
RIP [<ffff...c7>] usb_kick_khubd + 0x10/0x25 RSP < ffff ... e0> CR2: 00000...098
---[ end trace 8219......]----
uhci_hcd 0000:00:1a:0 host controller process error, something bad happened ! uhci_hcd 0000:00:1a:0 host controller halted , very bad uhci_hcd 0000:00:1a:0 HC died, cleaning up
2.6.31-rc6 loads fine in same environment under Xen 3.4.1 on top of F12 rawhide
Boris,
I thought Fedora will no longer have dom 0 kernel?
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/XenPvopsDom0
"Dom0 status: awaiting upstream kernel support"
-- Pasi
Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
_______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel