On Fri, Jun 29, 2012 at 9:59 AM, Johannes Lips <johannes.lips(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On Fri, Jun 29, 2012 at 2:53 PM, Sergio <secipolla(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>
> I have another observation.
> I wouldn't ship Midori with the spin.
> It isn't an Xfce app. It uses
git.xfce.org but it's an Elementary Project
> app.*
> It isn't so lightweight on resources. It's small but that's because it
> uses the stock webkit-gtk engine which isn't small (but, granted, GIMP needs
> it too so the spin doesn't get much larger).
> But most importantly, it's unusable currently as it crashes everywhere and
> Firefox does the job pretty well.
>
>
> * I used to use Midori as I translated it back then and kept always
> running the development version. I'm not a programmer so I can't say if one
> thing has to do with the other but ever since Christian (the main dev)
> started focusing on GTK3 support and that Ubuntu 'menu-on-the-panel' thing
> Midori went downhill. Mainly, I suppose, because the stock webkit-gtk engine
> browser crashes everywhere and so does Midori.
>
> _______________________________________________
> xfce mailing list
> xfce(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
>
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xfce
Sorry but midori is still a Xfce app, even if it's developed with some focus
on keeping the elementary design. Also it's not that unstable if you just
use it for basic web browsing.
I could observe a lot of crashes related to flash. If you try to avoid flash
it works pretty flawless.
Johannes
_______________________________________________
xfce mailing list
xfce(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xfce
I use Midori a lot - Chrome is my 'main' browser, but at work, I use
Midori to keep out ticketing system, wiki and intranet up - it's light
on resources, and works well for that task, and helps me keep my
personal stuff (chrome) separate from my chrome stuff.
--
-jayson