Am Sonntag, den 27.02.2011, 21:39 +0100 schrieb Marcus Moeller:
Hi Christoph.
>> Now that Thunar supports a lot of network protocols and handles local
>> media quite will, I would like to ask if it's still necessary to include
>> Gigolo?
>
> I'd like to keep it in: Although you can mount devices with Thunar,
> Gigolo is more convenient. It allows you to store bookmarks and
> automount devices. Without the bookmarks you hardly know what to enter
> in Thunar's address bar.
Thunar also supports bookmarks.
Sure, but before you can do this you need to know the URI. ;)
Constructing gvfs-URIs is difficult when it comes to things like
bluetooth etc.
Regards,
Christoph