size of xfce live image

[Mukundan Ragavan]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

Is the greater than 700 MB size of F21 -beta RC4 Xfce live image
intentional? I thought the older images were less than 700 MB.

Mukundan.

- -- 
GPG key-ID: 00E8658D
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1
>
> iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJUUvMKAAoJEIfjPv0A6GWN6s4QALj00D87QB0Pa4b4dwERpaxN
> 5j/JBJnO2Ax3dNXpNopK4mjR54bOKL4hZ9Ky+0JILzAp00Km6ff4rjDEUpfeGwAd
> dg5a0GV+pFjhn4tmrppd2KJnx1JHkefcMyK8fKUz4rhWrJP6ziYTOr2VWb3jK6Yt
> 3UbL1XXkbhWdbq2nA9yQczQBWZpx1s11eU7bEFeTp4r7oh8ZkN4DuoJq+H6QVuk7
> N0FchzEpSKWw/G/5zJkRE/73fur2JSg6DmnXggO3aoLbjs/IDrmnqSoQ612TxyHp
> RLieOSEy+nmgQoB+aYeKKCFJ/3CYvTJE8VG3Ysb6oVPPwmQP9m719TMzNz7HHZVM
> 7637Xg0vkOfSDZ4uvXc9UYBg6wAYwqerXsfl9JnHQgQmfZVjokeybHdPPZ+7LeIs
> 3pPkq5isa/p9IGdRJshgPmiUptqKG73kEkgrMb/o52Dgppy5zgin5A55tX7FsGCT
> 1Gsl2rcfWiZa5lmbFbdIvmhUBP1cadaLoyLUM8uI69OiOUTvlq+jEDRR4hKhg224
> wmh8tBHAi8nlWGS425wgAS0SYtMeXYvlXPZuw3s+NMzZQfLeFzk2XC8t15Kp2YmR
> QE3suYzNOpTexfdGrRBj9ogrTKRE7ueqvMpLT+0ZjxXbGFD712Ckl1+xH/QLPBVD
> cGcrfMBlj2s2z1sXrHRp
> =x8C0
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

[Dridi Boukelmoune]

Hi Mukundan,

There was a recent discussion that concluded that it would be hard to
stay below the 700 MB mark. Maybe Kevin or someone else could tell
you more about it.

https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/xfce/2014-August/002068.html

Cheers,
Dridi

On Fri, Oct 31, 2014 at 3:25 AM, Mukundan Ragavan
 wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA512
>
> Is the greater than 700 MB size of F21 -beta RC4 Xfce live image
> intentional? I thought the older images were less than 700 MB.
>
> Mukundan.
>
> GPG key-ID: 00E8658D
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1
>
> iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJUUvMKAAoJEIfjPv0A6GWN6s4QALj00D87QB0Pa4b4dwERpaxN
> 5j/JBJnO2Ax3dNXpNopK4mjR54bOKL4hZ9Ky+0JILzAp00Km6ff4rjDEUpfeGwAd
> dg5a0GV+pFjhn4tmrppd2KJnx1JHkefcMyK8fKUz4rhWrJP6ziYTOr2VWb3jK6Yt
> 3UbL1XXkbhWdbq2nA9yQczQBWZpx1s11eU7bEFeTp4r7oh8ZkN4DuoJq+H6QVuk7
> N0FchzEpSKWw/G/5zJkRE/73fur2JSg6DmnXggO3aoLbjs/IDrmnqSoQ612TxyHp
> RLieOSEy+nmgQoB+aYeKKCFJ/3CYvTJE8VG3Ysb6oVPPwmQP9m719TMzNz7HHZVM
> 7637Xg0vkOfSDZ4uvXc9UYBg6wAYwqerXsfl9JnHQgQmfZVjokeybHdPPZ+7LeIs
> 3pPkq5isa/p9IGdRJshgPmiUptqKG73kEkgrMb/o52Dgppy5zgin5A55tX7FsGCT
> 1Gsl2rcfWiZa5lmbFbdIvmhUBP1cadaLoyLUM8uI69OiOUTvlq+jEDRR4hKhg224
> wmh8tBHAi8nlWGS425wgAS0SYtMeXYvlXPZuw3s+NMzZQfLeFzk2XC8t15Kp2YmR
> QE3suYzNOpTexfdGrRBj9ogrTKRE7ueqvMpLT+0ZjxXbGFD712Ckl1+xH/QLPBVD
> cGcrfMBlj2s2z1sXrHRp
> =x8C0
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
> _______________________________________________
> xfce mailing list
> [e-mail]
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xfce

[Kevin Fenzi]

On Fri, 31 Oct 2014 11:24:35 +0100
Dridi Boukelmoune  wrote:
> Hi Mukundan,
>
> There was a recent discussion that concluded that it would be hard to
> stay below the 700 MB mark. Maybe Kevin or someone else could tell
> you more about it.
>
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/xfce/2014-August/002068.html

Yes, it's hard, but I still wanted to try and do so.

The big annoyance is that it seems to move around a lot.

RC1 we were just fine:

-rw-r--r--. 1 ausil      releng 644M Oct 24 00:37 21_Beta_RC1/Live/i386/Fedora-Live-Xfce-i686-21_Beta-1.iso
-rw-r--r--. 1 ausil      releng 682M Oct 24 00:40 21_Beta_RC1/Live/x86_64/Fedora-Live-Xfce-x86_64-21_Beta-1.iso

RC2 we were over:

-rw-r--r--. 1 pbrobinson releng 611M Oct 29 01:02 21_Beta_RC2/Live/i386/Fedora-Live-Xfce-i686-21_Beta-2.iso
-rw-r--r--. 1 pbrobinson releng 705M Oct 29 01:15 21_Beta_RC2/Live/x86_64/Fedora-Live-Xfce-x86_64-21_Beta-2.iso

There should not have been 23MB of changes there? and the 32bit one got smaller?

RC4/beta:

-rw-r--r--. 1 pbrobinson releng 639M Oct 29 19:35 21_Beta_RC4/Live/i386/Fedora-Live-Xfce-i686-21_Beta-4.iso
-rw-r--r--. 1 pbrobinson releng 715M Oct 29 19:56 21_Beta_RC4/Live/x86_64/Fedora-Live-Xfce-x86_64-21_Beta-4.iso

The TC's were all over the map too:

-rw-r--r--. 1 pbrobinson releng 698M Oct  7 19:39 21_Beta_TC2/Live/i386/Fedora-Live-Xfce-i686-21_Beta-TC2.iso
-rw-r--r--. 1 pbrobinson releng 664M Oct  7 19:38 21_Beta_TC2/Live/x86_64/Fedora-Live-Xfce-x86_64-21_Beta-TC2.iso
-rw-r--r--. 1 ausil      releng 727M Oct 10 01:45 21_Beta_TC3/Live/i386/Fedora-Live-Xfce-i686-21_Beta-TC3.iso
-rw-r--r--. 1 ausil      releng 765M Oct 10 01:21 21_Beta_TC3/Live/x86_64/Fedora-Live-Xfce-x86_64-21_Beta-TC3.iso
-rwxr-xr-x. 1 pbrobinson releng 649M Oct 17 12:07 21_Beta_TC4/Live/i386/Fedora-Live-Xfce-i686-21_Beta-TC4.iso
-rwxr-xr-x. 1 pbrobinson releng 706M Oct 17 12:52 21_Beta_TC4/Live/x86_64/Fedora-Live-Xfce-x86_64-21_Beta-TC4.iso

So, I am not sure whats going on... ideas welcome.

kevin