-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA512
Is the greater than 700 MB size of F21 -beta RC4 Xfce live image intentional? I thought the older images were less than 700 MB.
Mukundan.
- -- GPG key-ID: 00E8658D
Hi Mukundan,
There was a recent discussion that concluded that it would be hard to stay below the 700 MB mark. Maybe Kevin or someone else could tell you more about it.
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/xfce/2014-August/002068.html
Cheers, Dridi
On Fri, Oct 31, 2014 at 3:25 AM, Mukundan Ragavan nonamedotc@fedoraproject.org wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA512
Is the greater than 700 MB size of F21 -beta RC4 Xfce live image intentional? I thought the older images were less than 700 MB.
Mukundan.
GPG key-ID: 00E8658D
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1
iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJUUvMKAAoJEIfjPv0A6GWN6s4QALj00D87QB0Pa4b4dwERpaxN 5j/JBJnO2Ax3dNXpNopK4mjR54bOKL4hZ9Ky+0JILzAp00Km6ff4rjDEUpfeGwAd dg5a0GV+pFjhn4tmrppd2KJnx1JHkefcMyK8fKUz4rhWrJP6ziYTOr2VWb3jK6Yt 3UbL1XXkbhWdbq2nA9yQczQBWZpx1s11eU7bEFeTp4r7oh8ZkN4DuoJq+H6QVuk7 N0FchzEpSKWw/G/5zJkRE/73fur2JSg6DmnXggO3aoLbjs/IDrmnqSoQ612TxyHp RLieOSEy+nmgQoB+aYeKKCFJ/3CYvTJE8VG3Ysb6oVPPwmQP9m719TMzNz7HHZVM 7637Xg0vkOfSDZ4uvXc9UYBg6wAYwqerXsfl9JnHQgQmfZVjokeybHdPPZ+7LeIs 3pPkq5isa/p9IGdRJshgPmiUptqKG73kEkgrMb/o52Dgppy5zgin5A55tX7FsGCT 1Gsl2rcfWiZa5lmbFbdIvmhUBP1cadaLoyLUM8uI69OiOUTvlq+jEDRR4hKhg224 wmh8tBHAi8nlWGS425wgAS0SYtMeXYvlXPZuw3s+NMzZQfLeFzk2XC8t15Kp2YmR QE3suYzNOpTexfdGrRBj9ogrTKRE7ueqvMpLT+0ZjxXbGFD712Ckl1+xH/QLPBVD cGcrfMBlj2s2z1sXrHRp =x8C0 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ xfce mailing list xfce@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xfce
On Fri, 31 Oct 2014 11:24:35 +0100 Dridi Boukelmoune dridi.boukelmoune@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Mukundan,
There was a recent discussion that concluded that it would be hard to stay below the 700 MB mark. Maybe Kevin or someone else could tell you more about it.
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/xfce/2014-August/002068.html
Yes, it's hard, but I still wanted to try and do so.
The big annoyance is that it seems to move around a lot.
RC1 we were just fine:
-rw-r--r--. 1 ausil releng 644M Oct 24 00:37 21_Beta_RC1/Live/i386/Fedora-Live-Xfce-i686-21_Beta-1.iso -rw-r--r--. 1 ausil releng 682M Oct 24 00:40 21_Beta_RC1/Live/x86_64/Fedora-Live-Xfce-x86_64-21_Beta-1.iso
RC2 we were over:
-rw-r--r--. 1 pbrobinson releng 611M Oct 29 01:02 21_Beta_RC2/Live/i386/Fedora-Live-Xfce-i686-21_Beta-2.iso -rw-r--r--. 1 pbrobinson releng 705M Oct 29 01:15 21_Beta_RC2/Live/x86_64/Fedora-Live-Xfce-x86_64-21_Beta-2.iso
There should not have been 23MB of changes there? and the 32bit one got smaller?
RC4/beta:
-rw-r--r--. 1 pbrobinson releng 639M Oct 29 19:35 21_Beta_RC4/Live/i386/Fedora-Live-Xfce-i686-21_Beta-4.iso -rw-r--r--. 1 pbrobinson releng 715M Oct 29 19:56 21_Beta_RC4/Live/x86_64/Fedora-Live-Xfce-x86_64-21_Beta-4.iso
The TC's were all over the map too:
-rw-r--r--. 1 pbrobinson releng 698M Oct 7 19:39 21_Beta_TC2/Live/i386/Fedora-Live-Xfce-i686-21_Beta-TC2.iso -rw-r--r--. 1 pbrobinson releng 664M Oct 7 19:38 21_Beta_TC2/Live/x86_64/Fedora-Live-Xfce-x86_64-21_Beta-TC2.iso -rw-r--r--. 1 ausil releng 727M Oct 10 01:45 21_Beta_TC3/Live/i386/Fedora-Live-Xfce-i686-21_Beta-TC3.iso -rw-r--r--. 1 ausil releng 765M Oct 10 01:21 21_Beta_TC3/Live/x86_64/Fedora-Live-Xfce-x86_64-21_Beta-TC3.iso -rwxr-xr-x. 1 pbrobinson releng 649M Oct 17 12:07 21_Beta_TC4/Live/i386/Fedora-Live-Xfce-i686-21_Beta-TC4.iso -rwxr-xr-x. 1 pbrobinson releng 706M Oct 17 12:52 21_Beta_TC4/Live/x86_64/Fedora-Live-Xfce-x86_64-21_Beta-TC4.iso
So, I am not sure whats going on... ideas welcome.
kevin