new time slots for the Xfce SIG meetings

[Christoph Wickert]

I had to start the poll about the Xfce SIG meeting time all over again,
because we had some invalid votes that I could not delete.

If you are interested in joining our meetings, please enter your
favorite times at

http://whenisgood.net/xfce-sig

Results are visible at http://whenisgood.net/xfce-sig/results/sezb58

Regards,
Christoph

[Kevin Fenzi]

On Tue, 09 Feb 2010 03:07:28 +0100
Christoph Wickert <christoph.wickert(a)googlemail.com&gt; wrote:

>  I had to start the poll about the Xfce SIG meeting time all over
>  again, because we had some invalid votes that I could not delete.
>  
>  If you are interested in joining our meetings, please enter your
>  favorite times at
>  
>  http://whenisgood.net/xfce-sig
>  
>  Results are visible at http://whenisgood.net/xfce-sig/results/sezb58 
Do we have enough results? Can we look at scheduling something?

kevin

[Christoph Wickert]

Am Donnerstag, den 04.03.2010, 13:02 -0700 schrieb Kevin Fenzi:
>  On Tue, 09 Feb 2010 03:07:28 +0100
>  Christoph Wickert <christoph.wickert(a)googlemail.com&gt; wrote:
>
>  > Results are visible at http://whenisgood.net/xfce-sig/results/sezb58
>  
>  Do we have enough results? Can we look at scheduling something? 
I think we should just go for one of the slots. An hour should easily be
enough, so we can use any slot we want. I think I prefer Monday or
Wednesday.

Regards,
Christoph

[Dominic Hopf]

Am Donnerstag, den 04.03.2010, 23:41 +0100 schrieb Christoph Wickert:
>  Am Donnerstag, den 04.03.2010, 13:02 -0700 schrieb Kevin Fenzi:
>  > On Tue, 09 Feb 2010 03:07:28 +0100
>  > Christoph Wickert <christoph.wickert(a)googlemail.com&gt; wrote:
>  >
>  > > Results are visible at http://whenisgood.net/xfce-sig/results/sezb58
>  > 
>  > Do we have enough results? Can we look at scheduling something?
>  
>  I think we should just go for one of the slots. An hour should easily be
>  enough, so we can use any slot we want. I think I prefer Monday or
>  Wednesday. 
I'd suggest Monday then.

Regards,
Dominic

-- 
Dominic Hopf <dmaphy(a)googlemail.com&gt;

http://dominichopf.de/

Key Fingerprint:
A7DF C4FC 07AE 4DDC 5CA0 BD93 AAB0 6019 CA7D 868D

[Kevin Fenzi]

On Fri, 05 Mar 2010 23:03:57 +0100
Dominic Hopf <dmaphy(a)googlemail.com&gt; wrote:

>  Am Donnerstag, den 04.03.2010, 23:41 +0100 schrieb Christoph
> Wickert:
>  > Am Donnerstag, den 04.03.2010, 13:02 -0700 schrieb Kevin Fenzi:
>  > > On Tue, 09 Feb 2010 03:07:28 +0100
>  > > Christoph Wickert <christoph.wickert(a)googlemail.com&gt; wrote:
>  > >
>  > > > Results are visible at
>  > > > http://whenisgood.net/xfce-sig/results/sezb58
>  > > 
>  > > Do we have enough results? Can we look at scheduling something?
>  > 
>  > I think we should just go for one of the slots. An hour should
>  > easily be enough, so we can use any slot we want. I think I prefer
>  > Monday or Wednesday.
>  
>  I'd suggest Monday then. 
ok, I'm horrible at figuring what timezone this thing is in. 

What time would that be UTC?

kevin

[Christoph Wickert]

Am Freitag, den 05.03.2010, 15:37 -0700 schrieb Kevin Fenzi:

>  ok, I'm horrible at figuring what timezone this thing is in. 
>  
>  What time would that be UTC? 
20:00 UTC

>  kevin 
Regards,
Christoph

[Kevin Fenzi]

On Fri, 05 Mar 2010 23:44:17 +0100
Christoph Wickert <christoph.wickert(a)googlemail.com&gt; wrote:

>  Am Freitag, den 05.03.2010, 15:37 -0700 schrieb Kevin Fenzi:
>  
>  > ok, I'm horrible at figuring what timezone this thing is in. 
>  > 
>  > What time would that be UTC?
>  
>  20:00 UTC 
ok. Should we look at next monday at that time?

Or another week out to give more time to let people hear about the
meeting?

kevin