Gigolo <--> thunar (F16+)

[Frank Murphy]

Is it possible to get greater integration
between thunar gigolo.

Is is possible to get Thunar to show nfs mounts when network is clicked
or to show gigolo bookmarks.

Or which upstream would be the best direction to ask?

-- 
Regards,

Frank Murphy
UTF_8 Encoded
Friend of fedoraproject.org

[Heiko Adams]

Am 21.12.2011 10:45, schrieb Frank Murphy:
>  Is it possible to get greater integration
>  between thunar gigolo.
>  
>  Is is possible to get Thunar to show nfs mounts when network is clicked
>  or to show gigolo bookmarks.
>  
>  Or which upstream would be the best direction to ask?
>   
IMHO you should file bugs on both upstream bugtrackers referencing each
other because both have to do some work to make this possible.

[Christoph Wickert]

Am Mittwoch, den 21.12.2011, 15:37 +0100 schrieb Heiko Adams:
>  Am 21.12.2011 10:45, schrieb Frank Murphy:
>  > Is it possible to get greater integration
>  > between thunar gigolo.
>  > 
>  > Is is possible to get Thunar to show nfs mounts when network is clicked
>  > or to show gigolo bookmarks.
>  > 
>  > Or which upstream would be the best direction to ask?
>  > 
>  IMHO you should file bugs on both upstream bugtrackers referencing each
>  other because both have to do some work to make this possible. 
I think neither Thunar nor gigolo is the right address. First of all
this only affects Thunar, gigolo already does it's job and opens the
preferred file manager when something is mounted.

But Thunar on the other hand only gets this information from gvfs, so
this needs to be at bugzilla.gnome.org. I'm not really sure about this,
but I assume that nautlus behaves the same, right?

Regards,
Christoph

[Frank Murphy]

On 21/12/11 18:30, Christoph Wickert wrote:
>  But Thunar on the other hand only gets this information from gvfs, so
>  this needs to be at bugzilla.gnome.org. I'm not really sure about this,
>  but I assume that nautlus behaves the same, right?
>
>  Regards,
>  Christoph
>  
I have the barest gnome required installed,
so no  nautilus so don't know.
though Enrico asked me to try  gvfs-mount -l

gvfs-mount -l
Drive(0): 147 GB Hard Disk
   Type: GProxyDrive (GProxyVolumeMonitorGdu)
   Volume(0): _Fedora-14-x86_6
     Type: GProxyVolume (GProxyVolumeMonitorGdu)
     Mount(0): _Fedora-14-x86_6 -> file:///
       Type: GProxyMount (GProxyVolumeMonitorGdu)
Drive(1): CD/DVD Drive
   Type: GProxyDrive (GProxyVolumeMonitorGdu)
Drive(2): 11 GB Hard Disk
   Type: GProxyDrive (GProxyVolumeMonitorGdu)
   Volume(0): 11 GB Swap Space
     Type: GProxyVolume (GProxyVolumeMonitorGdu)
Drive(3): CD/DVD Drive
   Type: GProxyDrive (GProxyVolumeMonitorGdu)
Drive(4): 160 GB Hard Disk
   Type: GProxyDrive (GProxyVolumeMonitorGdu)
   Volume(0): 160 GB Filesystem
     Type: GProxyVolume (GProxyVolumeMonitorGdu)
     Mount(0): 160 GB Filesystem -> file:///home
       Type: GProxyMount (GProxyVolumeMonitorGdu)
Volume(2): Virtual //* an nfs share in fstab */
   Type: GProxyVolume (GProxyVolumeMonitorGdu)
Volume(3): Net01   //* ditto */
   Type: GProxyVolume (GProxyVolumeMonitorGdu)
Volume(5): Torrents //* ditto */
   Type: GProxyVolume (GProxyVolumeMonitorGdu)
Mount(2): Filesystem root -> file:///
   Type: GProxyMount (GProxyVolumeMonitorGdu)

comments mine.

-- 
Regards,

Frank Murphy
UTF_8 Encoded
Friend of fedoraproject.org

NFS with Gigolo/GVfs (was: Re: Gigolo <--> thunar (F16+))

[Enrico Tröger]

On Wed, 21 Dec 2011 18:51:28 +0000, Frank wrote:

> On 21/12/11 18:30, Christoph Wickert wrote:
> >
> > But Thunar on the other hand only gets this information from gvfs, so
> > this needs to be at bugzilla.gnome.org. I'm not really sure about
> > this, but I assume that nautlus behaves the same, right?
> >
> > Regards,
> > Christoph
> >
>
> I have the barest gnome required installed,
> so no  nautilus so don't know.
> though Enrico asked me to try  gvfs-mount -l
>
> gvfs-mount -l
>  [...]
> Volume(2): Virtual //* an nfs share in fstab */
>    Type: GProxyVolume (GProxyVolumeMonitorGdu) 
This looks fine, Gigolo doesn't list it?
Could you share your fstab entry?


Regards,
Enrico

-- 
Get my GPG key from http://www.uvena.de/pub.asc

[Enrico Tröger]

On Wed, 21 Dec 2011 09:45:05 +0000, Frank wrote:

> Is it possible to get greater integration
> between thunar gigolo. 

In the early days, Gigolo was meant as a temporary solution to manage
GVfs in Xfce to some extend until Thunar has been ported to GVfs.

Now that Thunar has been ported already quite some time ago, I'm not
sure how to proceed. I don't know Jannis' plans regarding bookmarks and
stuff in Thunar.


I'd suggest to move this discussion either in the Xfce bugtracker, most
probably Thunar component.
Or better, to the Xfce devel mailing list.

Regards,
Enrico

-- 
Get my GPG key from http://www.uvena.de/pub.asc