Hello all, It's getting to be that time again when we need to buckle down and knock out some QA bits with the Xfce Spin. We're now in Beta and the overall experience with the Xfce Spin has been good on my end even though I haven't had a chance to really test as much as I would like to so I'm going to plan a Xfce Spin test day. The following is the wiki page I've got drawn up for the day, please feel free to comment on it and we can edit accordingly.
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/XFCE_Test_Day:Tentative
Another bit I wanted to talk about is the fact that our nightly builds are larger than the size of a cdrom and thus makes them difficult as a target for live cds. I'd like to ask for opinions on what we would like to have cut/removed/whatever. Current size can be seen here: http://alt.fedoraproject.org/pub/alt/nightly-composes/xfce/
And a list of current packages here: https://fedorahosted.org/spin-kickstarts/browser/fedora-livecd-xfce.ks
Opinions welcome!
-AdamM
On Tue, 20 Apr 2010 10:51:45 -0500 Adam Miller maxamillion@fedoraproject.org wrote:
Hi,
Another bit I wanted to talk about is the fact that our nightly builds are larger than the size of a cdrom and thus makes them difficult as a target for live cds. I'd like to ask for opinions on what we would like to have cut/removed/whatever. Current size can be seen here: http://alt.fedoraproject.org/pub/alt/nightly-composes/xfce/
And a list of current packages here: https://fedorahosted.org/spin-kickstarts/browser/fedora-livecd-xfce.ks
Opinions welcome!
Maybe you can remove: - transmission or rtorrent - xfce4-eyes-plugin
Matthias
On 04/20/2010 09:32 PM, Summer Matthias wrote:
On Tue, 20 Apr 2010 10:51:45 -0500 Adam Millermaxamillion@fedoraproject.org wrote:
Hi,
Another bit I wanted to talk about is the fact that our nightly builds are larger than the size of a cdrom and thus makes them difficult as a target for live cds. I'd like to ask for opinions on what we would like to have cut/removed/whatever. Current size can be seen here: http://alt.fedoraproject.org/pub/alt/nightly-composes/xfce/
And a list of current packages here: https://fedorahosted.org/spin-kickstarts/browser/fedora-livecd-xfce.ks
Opinions welcome!
Maybe you can remove:
- transmission or rtorrent
- xfce4-eyes-plugin
Matthias
I think Christoph filed a bug to remove some dependencies: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=581144
Don't know if there is any recent changes concerning this issue.
Greetings, Johannes
Am Dienstag, den 20.04.2010, 21:36 +0200 schrieb Johannes Lips:
On 04/20/2010 09:32 PM, Summer Matthias wrote:
On Tue, 20 Apr 2010 10:51:45 -0500 Adam Millermaxamillion@fedoraproject.org wrote:
Hi,
Another bit I wanted to talk about is the fact that our nightly builds are larger than the size of a cdrom and thus makes them difficult as a target for live cds. I'd like to ask for opinions on what we would like to have cut/removed/whatever. Current size can be seen here: http://alt.fedoraproject.org/pub/alt/nightly-composes/xfce/
And a list of current packages here: https://fedorahosted.org/spin-kickstarts/browser/fedora-livecd-xfce.ks
Opinions welcome!
Maybe you can remove:
- transmission or rtorrent
I think we really need a torrent client, but I'm fine removing some console stuff.
- xfce4-eyes-plugin
This is the most important plugin ever!!! ;)
Just kidding: It doesn't save much space, only 75 KB.
I think Christoph filed a bug to remove some dependencies: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=581144
Don't know if there is any recent changes concerning this issue.
I have set the bug to need info. If Warren doesn't respond in time, I'm willing to (ab)use my proven packager powers to fix this.
I think there are also other ways to save space, I'm thinking of explicitly excluding some input methods or fonts. Is this appropriate or are we discriminating certain people/countries/languages then?
Greetings, Johannes
Regards, Christoph
On Tue, 20 Apr 2010 10:51:45 -0500 Adam Miller maxamillion@fedoraproject.org wrote:
Hello all, It's getting to be that time again when we need to buckle down and knock out some QA bits with the Xfce Spin. We're now in Beta and the overall experience with the Xfce Spin has been good on my end even though I haven't had a chance to really test as much as I would like to so I'm going to plan a Xfce Spin test day. The following is the wiki page I've got drawn up for the day, please feel free to comment on it and we can edit accordingly.
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/XFCE_Test_Day:Tentative
Another bit I wanted to talk about is the fact that our nightly builds are larger than the size of a cdrom and thus makes them difficult as a target for live cds. I'd like to ask for opinions on what we would like to have cut/removed/whatever. Current size can be seen here: http://alt.fedoraproject.org/pub/alt/nightly-composes/xfce/
And a list of current packages here: https://fedorahosted.org/spin-kickstarts/browser/fedora-livecd-xfce.ks
Sorry for the delay here in replying. ;(
How about nuking specspo? The desktop spin already does.
The evince update doesn't seem to have appeared. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/evince-2.30.0-4.fc13 says it was pushed to stable, but I don't see that version at all. That will save us nautilus when that appears. Will try and find out what happened to it.
With those two we might be ok.
kevin
I got the evince update tagged in correctly, and now:
-rw-r--r--. 1 root root 691M Apr 24 01:34 xfce-i386-20100423.23.iso -rw-r--r--. 1 root root 694M Apr 24 02:00 xfce-x86_64-20100423.23.iso
:)
kevin
On Tue, 20 Apr 2010 10:51:45 -0500 Adam Miller maxamillion@fedoraproject.org wrote:
Hello all, It's getting to be that time again when we need to buckle down and knock out some QA bits with the Xfce Spin. We're now in Beta and the overall experience with the Xfce Spin has been good on my end even though I haven't had a chance to really test as much as I would like to so I'm going to plan a Xfce Spin test day. The following is the wiki page I've got drawn up for the day, please feel free to comment on it and we can edit accordingly.
Oh, forgot to mention the test day. ;)
I changed tigervnc mention there to remmina.
Do we want to change 'rawhide' to 'f13' there? I would like to see more testing on f13 than rawhide, which could be broken in other ways since most efforts have focused on f13.
Otherwise looks good, and happy to do it whenever.
kevin