Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F38 to F39
by Miroslav Suchý
Do you want to make Fedora 39 better? Please spend 1 minute of your time and try to run:
# Run this only if you use default Fedora modules
# next time you run any DNF command default modules will be enabled again
sudo dnf module reset '*'
dnf --releasever=39 --setopt=module_platform_id=platform:f39 \
--enablerepo=updates-testing \
$(rpm -q fedora-repos-modular >/dev/null && echo --enablerepo=updates-testing-modular) \
--assumeno distro-sync
This command does not replace `dnf system-upgrade`, but it will reveal potential problems.
You may also run `dnf upgrade` before running this command.
The `--assumeno` will just test the transaction, but does not make the actual upgrade.
In case you hit dependency issues, please report it against the appropriate package.
Or against fedora-obsolete-packages if that package should be removed in Fedora 39. Please check existing reports
against fedora-obsolete-packages first:
https://red.ht/2kuBDPu
and also there is already bunch of "Fails to install" (F39FailsToInstall) reports:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/buglist.cgi?bug_id=2168845&bug_id_type=anddep...
Two notes:
* you may want to run the same command with dnf5 to help test new dnf.
* this command found zero issues on my personal system - great work all everybody!
Thank you
Miroslav
9 months, 4 weeks
Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F38 to F39
by Yaakov Selkowitz
On Wed, 2023-08-23 at 20:22 +0200, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
> Do you want to make Fedora 39 better? Please spend 1 minute of your
> time and try to run:
>
> dnf --releasever=39 --setopt=module_platform_id=platform:f39 \
> --enablerepo=updates-testing \
> $(rpm -q fedora-repos-modular >/dev/null && echo --
> enablerepo=updates-testing-modular) \
> --assumeno distro-sync
No problems on my host system. Only problems in my toolbox were due to
third-party repositories not yet being ready for F39, and --best --
allowerasing worked around those (which would have removed those
packages).
Let's keep being vigilant as we get closer to GA, but well done so far!
--
Yaakov Selkowitz
Principal Software Engineer - Emerging RHEL
Red Hat, Inc.
9 months, 4 weeks
Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F38 to F39
by Luna Jernberg
Did this on my Thinkpad Edge a couple of days ago, and it went fine :)
Den ons 23 aug. 2023 kl 20:23 skrev Miroslav Suchý <msuchy(a)redhat.com>:
>
> Do you want to make Fedora 39 better? Please spend 1 minute of your time and try to run:
>
> # Run this only if you use default Fedora modules
> # next time you run any DNF command default modules will be enabled again
> sudo dnf module reset '*'
>
> dnf --releasever=39 --setopt=module_platform_id=platform:f39 \
> --enablerepo=updates-testing \
> $(rpm -q fedora-repos-modular >/dev/null && echo --enablerepo=updates-testing-modular) \
> --assumeno distro-sync
>
>
> This command does not replace `dnf system-upgrade`, but it will reveal potential problems.
>
> You may also run `dnf upgrade` before running this command.
>
>
> The `--assumeno` will just test the transaction, but does not make the actual upgrade.
>
>
> In case you hit dependency issues, please report it against the appropriate package.
>
> Or against fedora-obsolete-packages if that package should be removed in Fedora 39. Please check existing reports against fedora-obsolete-packages first:
>
> https://red.ht/2kuBDPu
>
> and also there is already bunch of "Fails to install" (F39FailsToInstall) reports:
>
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/buglist.cgi?bug_id=2168845&bug_id_type=anddep...
>
>
> Two notes:
>
> * you may want to run the same command with dnf5 to help test new dnf.
>
> * this command found zero issues on my personal system - great work all everybody!
>
>
> Thank you
>
> Miroslav
> _______________________________________________
> devel mailing list -- devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
> Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
9 months, 3 weeks
Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers
by Christiano Anderson
------- Original Message -------
On Tuesday, September 5th, 2023 at 13:54, Miro Hrončok <mhroncok(a)redhat.com> wrote:
> > I pushed the change only to rawhide branch, should I do the same for f39?
>
>
> Yes please. But also build the package for both rawhide and Fedora 39 to make
> it installable:
>
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2220282
Thanks for the information, just did the build and repeated the process for f39. Could you please check if it looks fine?
>
> On Fedora 39, you need to create the update manually. Let me know iof you need
> help.
I got an error while running fedpkg update
Could not execute update: Could not generate update request: {"status": "error", "errors": [{"location": "body", "name": "builds", "description": "Update for python-iowait-0.2-25.fc40 already exists"}, {"location": "body", "name": "builds", "description": "Invalid tag: python-iowait-0.2-25.fc40 not tagged with any of the following tags ['epel9-next-testing-candidate', 'epel7-testing-candidate', 'eln-updates-candidate', 'epel8-testing-candidate', 'epel9-testing-candidate', 'epel8-next-testing-candidate', 'f40-container-updates-candidate', 'f37-modular-updates-candidate', 'f38-modular-updates-candidate', 'f39-container-updates-candidate', 'f38-flatpak-updates-candidate', 'f40-updates-candidate', 'f37-updates-candidate', 'f37-container-updates-candidate', 'f37-flatpak-updates-candidate', 'f38-updates-candidate', 'f38-container-updates-candidate', 'f39-flatpak-updates-candidate', 'f39-updates-candidate', 'f38-build-side-72874', 'f39-build-side-72708', 'f39-build-side-72878', 'f38-build-side-72953', 'epel9-build-side-72957', 'f38-build-side-72973', 'f40-build-side-72979', 'f38-build-side-72997', 'f39-build-side-73035', 'f40-build-side-73053', 'f39-build-side-73063', 'f40-build-side-73083', 'f37-build-side-73089', 'f38-build-side-73087', 'f40-build-side-73039', 'f40-build-side-73113', 'f39-build-side-73125', 'f39-build-side-73127', 'f39-build-side-73145', 'f38-build-side-73167']"}]}
A copy of the filled in template is saved as bodhi.template.last
Could you please tell me what's wrong here?
Thanks
9 months, 2 weeks
Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers
by František Šumšal
On 9/6/23 09:02, Christiano Anderson wrote:
> ------- Original Message -------
> On Tuesday, September 5th, 2023 at 13:54, Miro Hrončok <mhroncok(a)redhat.com> wrote:
> I got an error while running fedpkg update
>
> Could not execute update: Could not generate update request: {"status": "error", "errors": [{"location": "body", "name": "builds", "description": "Update for python-iowait-0.2-25.fc40 already exists"}, {"location": "body", "name": "builds", "description": "Invalid tag: python-iowait-0.2-25.fc40 not tagged with any of the following tags ['epel9-next-testing-candidate', 'epel7-testing-candidate', 'eln-updates-candidate', 'epel8-testing-candidate', 'epel9-testing-candidate', 'epel8-next-testing-candidate', 'f40-container-updates-candidate', 'f37-modular-updates-candidate', 'f38-modular-updates-candidate', 'f39-container-updates-candidate', 'f38-flatpak-updates-candidate', 'f40-updates-candidate', 'f37-updates-candidate', 'f37-container-updates-candidate', 'f37-flatpak-updates-candidate', 'f38-updates-candidate', 'f38-container-updates-candidate', 'f39-flatpak-updates-candidate', 'f39-updates-candidate', 'f38-build-side-72874', 'f39-build-side-72708', 'f39-build-side-72878', 'f38-build-side-72953', 'epel9-build-side-72957', 'f38-build-side-72973', 'f40-build-side-72979', 'f38-build-side-72997', 'f39-build-side-73035', 'f40-build-side-73053', 'f39-build-side-73063', 'f40-build-side-73083', 'f37-build-side-73089', 'f38-build-side-73087', 'f40-build-side-73039', 'f40-build-side-73113', 'f39-build-side-73125', 'f39-build-side-73127', 'f39-build-side-73145', 'f38-build-side-73167']"}]}
> A copy of the filled in template is saved as bodhi.template.last
>
> Could you please tell me what's wrong here?
Updates for Rawhide are created automagically after a successful build, so the update already exists [0], no need to create it manually. You'll need to do that only for F39.
[0] https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2023-dc1dca2af6
9 months, 2 weeks
Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers
by Christiano Anderson
------- Original Message -------
On Wednesday, September 6th, 2023 at 09:21, František Šumšal <frantisek(a)sumsal.cz> wrote:
> > Could not execute update: Could not generate update request: {"status": "error", "errors": [{"location": "body", "name": "builds", "description": "Update for python-iowait-0.2-25.fc40 already exists"}, {"location": "body", "name": "builds", "description": "Invalid tag: python-iowait-0.2-25.fc40 not tagged with any of the following tags ['epel9-next-testing-candidate', 'epel7-testing-candidate', 'eln-updates-candidate', 'epel8-testing-candidate', 'epel9-testing-candidate', 'epel8-next-testing-candidate', 'f40-container-updates-candidate', 'f37-modular-updates-candidate', 'f38-modular-updates-candidate', 'f39-container-updates-candidate', 'f38-flatpak-updates-candidate', 'f40-updates-candidate', 'f37-updates-candidate', 'f37-container-updates-candidate', 'f37-flatpak-updates-candidate', 'f38-updates-candidate', 'f38-container-updates-candidate', 'f39-flatpak-updates-candidate', 'f39-updates-candidate', 'f38-build-side-72874', 'f39-build-side-72708', 'f39-build-side-72878', 'f38-build-side-72953', 'epel9-build-side-72957', 'f38-build-side-72973', 'f40-build-side-72979', 'f38-build-side-72997', 'f39-build-side-73035', 'f40-build-side-73053', 'f39-build-side-73063', 'f40-build-side-73083', 'f37-build-side-73089', 'f38-build-side-73087', 'f40-build-side-73039', 'f40-build-side-73113', 'f39-build-side-73125', 'f39-build-side-73127', 'f39-build-side-73145', 'f38-build-side-73167']"}]}
> > A copy of the filled in template is saved as bodhi.template.last
> >
> > Could you please tell me what's wrong here?
>
>
> Updates for Rawhide are created automagically after a successful build, so the update already exists [0], no need to create it manually. You'll need to do that only for F39.
>
> [0] https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2023-dc1dca2af6
Thank you, I just did it for the F39 branch.
9 months, 2 weeks
Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F39 to F40
by Miroslav Suchý
Do you want to make Fedora 40 better? Please spend 1 minute of your time and try to run:
# Run this only if you use default Fedora modules
# next time you run any DNF command default modules will be enabled again
# This is last time we should do that :)
sudo dnf module reset '*'
dnf --releasever=40 --setopt=module_platform_id=platform:f40 \
--enablerepo=updates-testing \
$(rpm -q fedora-repos-modular >/dev/null && echo --enablerepo=updates-testing-modular) \
--assumeno distro-sync
This command does not replace `dnf system-upgrade`, but it will reveal potential problems.
You may also run `dnf upgrade` before running this command.
The `--assumeno` will just test the transaction, but does not make the actual upgrade.
In case you hit dependency issues, please report it against the appropriate package.
Or against fedora-obsolete-packages if that package should be removed in Fedora 40. Please check existing reports
against fedora-obsolete-packages first:
https://red.ht/2kuBDPu
and also there is already bunch of "Fails to install" (F40FailsToInstall) reports:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/buglist.cgi?bug_id=2231790&bug_id_type=anddep...
Two notes:
* you may want to run the same command with dnf5 to help test new dnf. Do not forget to add --best otherwise DNF5 hides
all problems.
* this command found several issues on my workstation. One was issue with teamd that you will likely hit too:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2263334
and there was few other with missing provides/obsoletes that I reported. For convenience here is the relevant part of
Fedora Guidelines:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/#renaming-or-re...
Thank you
Miroslav
3 months, 4 weeks
Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F39 to F40
by hhlp
al good as always good work only add --allowerasing in my case
Installing weak dependencies:
boost-numpy3 x86_64 1.83.0-3.fc40 fedora 30 k
cups-filters-driverless x86_64 1:2.0.0-6.fc40 fedora 29 k
gnome-software-fedora-langpacks x86_64 46~beta-1.fc40 fedora 24 k
libxcrypt-compat x86_64 4.4.36-5.fc40 fedora 89 k
nbdkit x86_64 1.37.8-1.fc40 fedora 16 k
nbdkit-curl-plugin x86_64 1.37.8-1.fc40 fedora 46 k
nbdkit-ssh-plugin x86_64 1.37.8-1.fc40 fedora 35 k
passim x86_64 0.1.5-3.fc40 fedora 161 k
pkcs11-provider x86_64 0.3-2.fc40 fedora 120 k
python3-keyring+completion noarch 24.3.0-6.fc40 fedora 14 k
python3-tabulate+widechars noarch 0.9.0-6.fc40 fedora 9.1 k
rpm-plugin-audit x86_64 4.19.1.1-1.fc40 fedora 20 k
xdriinfo x86_64 1.0.7-2.fc40 fedora 21 k
Removing:
kernel x86_64 6.7.3-200.fc39 @System
0
kernel-core x86_64 6.7.3-200.fc39 @System
66 M
kernel-devel x86_64 6.7.3-200.fc39 @System
70 M
kernel-modules x86_64 6.7.3-200.fc39 @System
57 M
kernel-modules-core x86_64 6.7.3-200.fc39 @System
32 M
kernel-modules-extra x86_64 6.7.3-200.fc39 @System
2.4 M
Removing dependent packages:
gnome-shell-extension-pop-shell noarch 1.2.0^21.aafc945-1.fc39 @System
416 k
kmod-v4l2loopback-6.7.3-200.fc39.x86_64
x86_64 0.12.7^20230503g2c9b670-2.fc39
@@commandline
24 k
Downgrading:
bind-libs x86_64 32:9.18.21-4.fc40 fedora 1.2 M
bind-license noarch 32:9.18.21-4.fc40 fedora 14 k
bind-utils x86_64 32:9.18.21-4.fc40 fedora 225 k
conmon x86_64 2:2.1.8-4.fc40 fedora 52 k
meld noarch 3.22.0-6.fc40 fedora 990 k
mysql-connector-python3 noarch 8.0.21-12.fc40 fedora 575 k
qbittorrent x86_64 1:4.6.3-1.fc40 fedora 7.4 M
Transaction Summary
================================================================================
Install 95 Packages
Upgrade 4572 Packages
Remove 8 Packages
Downgrade 7 Packages
El 21/2/24 a las 8:11, Miroslav Suchý escribió:
> dnf --releasever=40 --setopt=module_platform_id=platform:f40 \
> --enablerepo=updates-testing \
> $(rpm -q fedora-repos-modular >/dev/null && echo
> --enablerepo=updates-testing-modular) \
> --assumeno distro-sync
3 months, 4 weeks
Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F39 to F40
by Didier Fabert
Le 21/02/2024 à 08:11, Miroslav Suchý a écrit :
> sudo dnf --releasever=40 --setopt=module_platform_id=platform:f40 \
--enablerepo=updates-testing \
$(rpm -q fedora-repos-modular >/dev/null && echo
--enablerepo=updates-testing-modular) \
--assumeno distro-sync
Erreur :
Problème 1: problème avec le paquet installé blender-1:4.0.2-1.fc39.x86_64
- blender-1:4.0.2-1.fc39.x86_64 from @System does not belong to a
distupgrade repository
- nothing provides libopenvdb.so.10.1()(64bit) needed by
blender-1:4.0.2-1.fc40.x86_64 from fedora
Problème 2: package audiocd-kio-libs-16.08.3-21.fc39.x86_64 from
@System requires audiocd-kio = 16.08.3-21.fc39, but none of the
providers can be installed
- audiocd-kio-16.08.3-21.fc39.x86_64 from @System does not belong to
a distupgrade repository
- problème avec le paquet installé
audiocd-kio-libs-16.08.3-21.fc39.x86_64
I will try to find time this week-end to fill bz
3 months, 3 weeks
Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F39 to F40
by Garry T. Williams
On Wednesday, February 21, 2024 2:11:49 AM EST Miroslav Suchý wrote:
> Do you want to make Fedora 40 better? Please spend 1 minute of your time and try to run:
>
> dnf --releasever=40 --setopt=module_platform_id=platform:f40 \
> --enablerepo=updates-testing \
> $(rpm -q fedora-repos-modular >/dev/null && echo --enablerepo=updates-testing-modular) \
> --assumeno distro-sync
No problem on my Dell workstation. But on my Dell XPS-13 laptop I
get:
Error:
Problem 1: package audiocd-kio-libs-16.08.3-21.fc39.x86_64 from @System requires audiocd-kio = 16.08.3-21.fc39, but none of the providers can be installed
- audiocd-kio-16.08.3-21.fc39.x86_64 from @System does not belong to a distupgrade repository
- problem with installed package audiocd-kio-libs-16.08.3-21.fc39.x86_64
Problem 2: package ktp-accounts-kcm-23.04.3-2.fc39.x86_64 from @System requires kaccounts-integration(x86-64) >= 23.04, but none of the providers can be installed
- kaccounts-integration-23.08.5-1.fc39.x86_64 from @System does not belong to a distupgrade repository
- problem with installed package ktp-accounts-kcm-23.04.3-2.fc39.x86_64
Problem 3: package network-scripts-ppp-2.5.0-3.fc39.x86_64 from @System requires network-scripts, but none of the providers can be installed
- network-scripts-10.20-1.fc39.x86_64 from @System does not belong to a distupgrade repository
- problem with installed package network-scripts-ppp-2.5.0-3.fc39.x86_64
Problem 4: package network-scripts-teamd-1.32-4.fc40.x86_64 from fedora requires network-scripts, but none of the providers can be installed
- problem with installed package network-scripts-teamd-1.32-1.fc39.x86_64
- package network-scripts-10.20-1.fc39.x86_64 from @System requires initscripts(x86-64) = 10.20-1.fc39, but none of the providers can be installed
- network-scripts-teamd-1.32-1.fc39.x86_64 from @System does not belong to a distupgrade repository
- initscripts-10.20-1.fc39.x86_64 from @System does not belong to a distupgrade repository
(try to add '--skip-broken' to skip uninstallable packages)
--
Garry T. Williams
3 months, 3 weeks
