Re: cisco ise
by Patrick O'Callaghan
On Tue, 2020-04-28 at 16:45 +0000, david richyad wrote:
> cisco ise helps safeguard your business. It lets you control access throughout your network, see the user and device details, and stop/contain any threats. You can also use it to enforce security policies throughout your network. As a result, it helps prevent any technical issues and strengthens your cybersecurity measures. In short, you can manage your network security with more ease. Everything can be handled in one place, as opposed to needing multiple different applications open at once.
>
> https://www.fieldengineer.com/blogs/cisco-ise-deployment-guide
Does this have anything to do with Fedora? Advertising is not
acceptable on this list.
poc
3 years, 12 months
Re: cisco ise
by Patrick O'Callaghan
On Fri, 2021-02-05 at 12:25 +0000, Frank Knipp wrote:
> Thanks for your thoughts. This is a fairly well-known and proven product for network settings. Cisco ISE is a tool for creating a corporate network access control system. That is, we control who connects, where and how. We can determine the client device, how it complies with our security policies, and so on. Cisco ISE is a powerful mechanism that allows you to clearly control who is on the network and what resources they use. If you are interested in information on this tool, I recommend looking for posts on Facebook. I found a lot of posts there with information on it and noticed that in most cases such posts have about 35 thousand likes! I'm sure this is because their authors used the help of https://soclikes.com/buy-facebook-likes to boost likes on Facebook.
Yet another HyperKitty post with no context.
poc
3 years, 2 months
Re: cisco ise
by Samuel Sieb
On 2/5/21 4:30 AM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
>
> Yet another HyperKitty post with no context.
It's SPAM, please don't reply to it.
I would have thought the included url would make that obvious...
3 years, 2 months
Re: cisco ise
by Matthew Miller
> It's SPAM, please don't reply to it.
> I would have thought the included url would make that obvious...
Right, please report these to Fedora Infrastruture
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
and otherwise ignore.
--
Matthew Miller
<mattdm(a)fedoraproject.org>
Fedora Project Leader
3 years, 2 months
Re: cisco ise
by Patrick O'Callaghan
On Fri, 2021-02-05 at 15:39 -0500, Matthew Miller wrote:
> > It's SPAM, please don't reply to it.
> > I would have thought the included url would make that obvious...
>
> Right, please report these to Fedora Infrastruture
> https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
> and otherwise ignore.
How many people know this? It's not an obvious place to report spam,
and it's not referenced anywhere on the Guidelines page. Maybe it
should be included in the mailing list footer.
poc
3 years, 2 months
Re: cisco ise
by Matthew Miller
On Fri, Feb 05, 2021 at 10:59:09PM +0000, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> On Fri, 2021-02-05 at 15:39 -0500, Matthew Miller wrote:
> > > It's SPAM, please don't reply to it.
> > > I would have thought the included url would make that obvious...
> >
> > Right, please report these to Fedora Infrastruture
> > https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
> > and otherwise ignore.
>
> How many people know this? It's not an obvious place to report spam,
> and it's not referenced anywhere on the Guidelines page. Maybe it
> should be included in the mailing list footer.
Good idea: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/9629
--
Matthew Miller
<mattdm(a)fedoraproject.org>
Fedora Project Leader
3 years, 2 months
Re: cisco ise
by Ed Greshko
On 06/02/2021 07:47, Matthew Miller wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 05, 2021 at 10:59:09PM +0000, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
>> On Fri, 2021-02-05 at 15:39 -0500, Matthew Miller wrote:
>>>> It's SPAM, please don't reply to it.
>>>> I would have thought the included url would make that obvious...
>>> Right, please report these to Fedora Infrastruture
>>> https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
>>> and otherwise ignore.
>> How many people know this? It's not an obvious place to report spam,
>> and it's not referenced anywhere on the Guidelines page. Maybe it
>> should be included in the mailing list footer.
> Good idea: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/9629
>
Along the lines of informing people. I don't know anything about HyperKitty.
Do you happen to know if there is a way to inform HyperKitty users that they
should quote what they are replying to so the folks using the mailing list won't
be "confused"?
--
The key to getting good answers is to ask good questions.
3 years, 2 months
Re: cisco ise
by Tim
On Sat, 2021-02-06 at 18:04 +0800, Ed Greshko wrote:
> Along the lines of informing people. I don't know anything about
> HyperKitty. Do you happen to know if there is a way to inform
> HyperKitty users that they should quote what they are replying to so
> the folks using the mailing list won't be "confused"?
It ought to be written on their webpages to quote what you're replying
to.
The temptation is to reply to them in a manner I've done before.
Saying "message deleted." It makes them panic.
--
uname -rsvp
Linux 3.10.0-1160.15.2.el7.x86_64 #1 SMP Wed Feb 3 15:06:38 UTC 2021 x86_64
Boilerplate: All unexpected mail to my mailbox is automatically deleted.
I will only get to see the messages that are posted to the mailing list.
3 years, 2 months
