Search results for "dnsmasq" - users

Re: Wireless problems. UPDATE

by Tim

On Wed, 2008-06-25 at 10:01 -0400, Mark Haney wrote: > dhcp6c is the IPv6 dhcp client right? Yes. > Okay, that being the case, what app does Fedora use get an IP from a > dhcp server? "dhclient" to get an IPv4 address from a server. "dhcp6c" to get an IPv6 address from a server. > On my laptop it's dhcpcd No, that's the DHCP server daemon that doles out addresses. > What daemon does Fedora use for dhcp? Try: yum search dhcp ===================================== Matched: dhcp ===================================== dhclient.i386 : Provides the dhclient ISC DHCP client daemon and dhclient-script dhcp.i386 : DHCP (Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol) server and relay agent dhcp-devel.i386 : Development headers and libraries for interfacing to the DHCP server libdhcp4client.i386 : ISC DHCP IPv4 client in a library for invocation from other programs libdhcp4client-devel.i386 : Header files for development with the ISC DHCP IPv4 client library NetworkManager.i386 : Network connection manager and user applications avahi-autoipd.i386 : Link-local IPv4 address automatic configuration daemon (IPv4LL) avahi-dnsconfd.i386 : Configure local unicast DNS settings based on information published in mDNS cobbler.noarch : Boot server configurator dhcp-forwarder.i386 : DHCP relay agent dhcp-forwarder-sysv.i386 : SysV initscripts for dhcp-forwarder dhcpv6.i386 : DHCPv6 - DHCP server and client for IPv6 dhcpv6-client.i386 : DHCPv6 client dnsmasq.i386 : A lightweight DHCP/caching DNS server gdhcpd.i386 : GTK+ administration tool for ISC DHCPD libdhcp.i386 : A library for network interface configuration with DHCP libdhcp-devel.i386 : C header files for development with libdhcp libdhcp6client.i386 : The DHCPv6 client in a library for invocation by other programs libdhcp6client-devel.i386 : Header files for development with the DHCPv6 client library libdhcp6client-static.i386 : Static archive for libdhcp6client nagios-plugins-dhcp.i386 : Nagios Plugin - check_dhcp rarpd.i386 : The RARP daemon. revisor-cobbler.noarch : Revisor Cobbler Integration wifiroamd.noarch : Automatic WiFi connection (re)establishment daemon wlassistant.i386 : Wireless network management tool But what are wanting to use as your DHCP server? The same computer? A different one? I thought you wanted to use your access point as it. -- [tim@localhost ~]$ uname -r 2.6.25.6-55.fc9.i686 Don't send private replies to my address, the mailbox is ignored. I read messages from the public lists.

15 years, 10 months

Re: Question on upgrading from FC6

by Robin Laing

Neil Cherry wrote: > Antonio M wrote: >> 2008/3/19, Neil Cherry <ncherry(a)linuxha.com>: >>> I have a server that's running FC6 and I'd like to run the latest >>> and greatest. I have quite a complex system as it's my home's >>> central server (home automation, DNS, printing, etc.). I'm under >>> the assumption that I'll need to upgrade it to Fedora 7 (I have >>> the iso) and then Fedora 8 (I have the iso). Are there any >>> warnings, other than backing up everything? >>> >>> In case you're wondering I'm preparing the system for IPV6 as I >>> need to learn IPV6 for work and having it is the best way to >>> learn it. > >> I am not sure that the original DVD of F8 will allow upgrade of an >> existing system (Please check if there is a bug), I remember that >> system froze during upgrading and I installed F8 from scratch. >> >> Please check.... > > Thanks, that's why I posted here first. :-) I'll check that > out as it would be a real pain to have to reinstall. I have > a lot of custom things such as my MTA setup. I'm also using > djb's dns software and I'd hate to have to rebuild everything > at this moment though I may move to dnsmasq in the future. > From the ongoing discussion about upgrades, any locally created applications may have to be rebuilt anyways due to changes in libraries and the base system. I have come across different configuration files between versions and when I moved from FC6 to F8 at work, I ended up with some weird problems that were associated to changes in F8 that required the IT staff to change my account around. The changes were good but just caused headaches. I have seen some update directly from F6 to F8 but their system was quite basic. No LVM's or partitions to worry about. All partitions were labeled. If you use third source repositories, you could end up with more headaches doing an upgrade. Backup your data and configuration files and then try. The worst is you have to do a clean install after trying. -- Robin Laing

16 years, 1 month

Re: Question on upgrading from FC6

by Patrick O'Callaghan

On Wed, 2008-03-19 at 10:22 -0400, Neil Cherry wrote: > Antonio M wrote: > > 2008/3/19, Neil Cherry <ncherry(a)linuxha.com>: > >> I have a server that's running FC6 and I'd like to run the latest > >> and greatest. I have quite a complex system as it's my home's > >> central server (home automation, DNS, printing, etc.). I'm under > >> the assumption that I'll need to upgrade it to Fedora 7 (I have > >> the iso) and then Fedora 8 (I have the iso). Are there any > >> warnings, other than backing up everything? > >> > >> In case you're wondering I'm preparing the system for IPV6 as I > >> need to learn IPV6 for work and having it is the best way to > >> learn it. > > > I am not sure that the original DVD of F8 will allow upgrade of an > > existing system (Please check if there is a bug), I remember that > > system froze during upgrading and I installed F8 from scratch. > > > > Please check.... > > Thanks, that's why I posted here first. :-) I'll check that > out as it would be a real pain to have to reinstall. I have > a lot of custom things such as my MTA setup. I'm also using > djb's dns software and I'd hate to have to rebuild everything > at this moment though I may move to dnsmasq in the future. You can certainly upgrade from F7 to F8 using the DVD (I've done it). However it's a toss-up whether going F6->F7->F8 is going to be troublefree. See the warnings and implicit "we don't guarantee this will work" parts of the Fedora Release Notes. You're probably safer backing up your config data and reinstalling. poc

16 years, 1 month

Re: Question on upgrading from FC6

by Rahul Sundaram

Neil Cherry wrote: > Thanks, that's why I posted here first. :-) I'll check that > out as it would be a real pain to have to reinstall. I have > a lot of custom things such as my MTA setup. I'm also using > djb's dns software and I'd hate to have to rebuild everything > at this moment though I may move to dnsmasq in the future. If you already have a data backup, http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/YumUpgradeFaq Rahul

16 years, 1 month

Re: Question on upgrading from FC6

by Neil Cherry

Antonio M wrote: > 2008/3/19, Neil Cherry <ncherry(a)linuxha.com>: >> I have a server that's running FC6 and I'd like to run the latest >> and greatest. I have quite a complex system as it's my home's >> central server (home automation, DNS, printing, etc.). I'm under >> the assumption that I'll need to upgrade it to Fedora 7 (I have >> the iso) and then Fedora 8 (I have the iso). Are there any >> warnings, other than backing up everything? >> >> In case you're wondering I'm preparing the system for IPV6 as I >> need to learn IPV6 for work and having it is the best way to >> learn it. > I am not sure that the original DVD of F8 will allow upgrade of an > existing system (Please check if there is a bug), I remember that > system froze during upgrading and I installed F8 from scratch. > > Please check.... Thanks, that's why I posted here first. :-) I'll check that out as it would be a real pain to have to reinstall. I have a lot of custom things such as my MTA setup. I'm also using djb's dns software and I'd hate to have to rebuild everything at this moment though I may move to dnsmasq in the future. -- Linux Home Automation Neil Cherry ncherry(a)linuxha.com http://www.linuxha.com/ Main site http://linuxha.blogspot.com/ My HA Blog Author of: Linux Smart Homes For Dummies

16 years, 1 month

Re: Re: FC7 and Apache won't start

by Mike - W0TMW

I've run netstat and lsof. While they show a number of processes using the IP, none are using port 80. I've also checked to see that I have only one "Listen" statement in httpd.conf and at this time, no VirtualHosts. I've since defaulted to the base httpd.conf as provided in the .rpm and still get the same error. Here is the screen showing "lsof" first and then netstat. The python entry is yum-updated. login as: root root(a)192.168.1.30's password: Access denied root(a)192.168.1.30's password: Last login: Fri Feb 15 19:32:36 2008 from 192.168.1.104 [root@cygni ~]# lsof -i:80 [root@cygni ~]# netstat -plant Active Internet connections (servers and established) Proto Recv-Q Send-Q Local Address Foreign Address State PID/Program name tcp 0 0 127.0.0.1:8000 0.0.0.0:* LISTEN 2640/nasd tcp 0 0 127.0.0.1:2208 0.0.0.0:* LISTEN 2218/hpiod tcp 0 0 0.0.0.0:3306 0.0.0.0:* LISTEN 2396/mysqld tcp 0 0 0.0.0.0:139 0.0.0.0:* LISTEN 2814/smbd tcp 0 0 127.0.0.1:783 0.0.0.0:* LISTEN 2501/spamd.pid tcp 0 0 0.0.0.0:111 0.0.0.0:* LISTEN 1857/rpcbind tcp 0 0 0.0.0.0:6000 0.0.0.0:* LISTEN 14053/Xorg tcp 0 0 0.0.0.0:10000 0.0.0.0:* LISTEN 3431/perl tcp 0 0 192.168.122.1:53 0.0.0.0:* LISTEN 2968/dnsmasq tcp 0 0 0.0.0.0:21 0.0.0.0:* LISTEN 2300/vsftpd tcp 0 0 192.168.1.30:53 0.0.0.0:* LISTEN 1827/named tcp 0 0 127.0.0.1:53 0.0.0.0:* LISTEN 1827/named tcp 0 0 127.0.0.1:631 0.0.0.0:* LISTEN 2240/cupsd tcp 0 0 0.0.0.0:25 0.0.0.0:* LISTEN 2533/sendmail: acce tcp 0 0 127.0.0.1:953 0.0.0.0:* LISTEN 1827/named tcp 0 0 0.0.0.0:445 0.0.0.0:* LISTEN 2814/smbd tcp 0 0 0.0.0.0:38078 0.0.0.0:* LISTEN 1896/rpc.statd tcp 0 0 127.0.0.1:2207 0.0.0.0:* LISTEN 2223/python tcp 0 0 192.168.1.30:139 192.168.1.100:1083 ESTABLISHED 13515/smbd tcp 0 0 :::993 :::* LISTEN 2477/dovecot tcp 0 0 :::995 :::* LISTEN 2477/dovecot tcp 0 0 :::110 :::* LISTEN 2477/dovecot tcp 0 0 :::143 :::* LISTEN 2477/dovecot tcp 0 0 :::6000 :::* LISTEN 14053/Xorg tcp 0 0 :::22 :::* LISTEN 2259/sshd tcp 0 0 ::1:953 :::* LISTEN 1827/named tcp 0 3260 ::ffff:192.168.1.30:22 ::ffff:192.168.1.100:1495 ESTABLISHED 14741/1 [root@cygni ~]# "Lose not thy airspeed lest the ground rises up and smites thee." - Anon. Ed Greshko wrote: > <div class="moz-text-flowed" style="font-family: -moz-fixed">Mike - > W0TMW wrote: >> I'm building a server based on FC7 and Apache won't start. I'm >> running out of space on another server and this one is intended as a >> replacement. I've looked through the archives, FAQs and while this >> issue is mentioned, that's all I can find---a mention with no help >> for resolution. >> >> The error is: >> >> Starting httpd: (98)Address already in use: make_sock: could not bind >> to address 192.168.1.300:80 No listening sockets available, shutting >> down. >> Unable to open logs [Failed] > > You need to find what is using port 80. > > Hint: netstat and lsof are your friends. > >> >> I have another webserver that works just fine. The log directory >> have identical owners/groups permissions so there shouldn't a >> permissions problem for the logfiles. Plus the httpd.conf is >> identical. One works the other servers doesn't >> > >

16 years, 2 months

Re: dnsmasq: address already in use

by John Summerfield

Ed Greshko wrote: > Are you by any chance trying to run dnsmasq as well as named on the same > system? I've not looked into running dnsmasq...but I believe if you try > running both you'll have conflicts. dnsmasq got set up behind my back on F8; I've been using dhcpd and bind for donkey's years, and plan on continuing to do so. It gets used by the virtualisation infrastructure, and while it keeps out of my way I plan on keeping out of its. Investigation shows it's only listening on virbr0; it should be keeping out of the way of BIND (but if bind defaults to listening to all addresses, and I think it does, then it could get in the way of dnsmasq). -- Cheers John -- spambait 1aaaaaaa(a)coco.merseine.nu Z1aaaaaaa(a)coco.merseine.nu -- Advice http://webfoot.com/advice/email.top.php http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html http://support.microsoft.com/kb/555375 You cannot reply off-list:-)

16 years, 3 months

Re: dnsmasq: address already in use

by Ed Greshko

Ric Moore wrote: > I keep getting that error, every time I boot. I've tried turning on and > off various services to no avail. I've googled and found hits on Ubuntu > and Debian lists, but none seem to supply a distinct error resolution. > Anyone have a clue?? Thanks for your patience. Ric Are you by any chance trying to run dnsmasq as well as named on the same system? I've not looked into running dnsmasq...but I believe if you try running both you'll have conflicts.

16 years, 3 months

dnsmasq: address already in use

by Ric Moore

I keep getting that error, every time I boot. I've tried turning on and off various services to no avail. I've googled and found hits on Ubuntu and Debian lists, but none seem to supply a distinct error resolution. Anyone have a clue?? Thanks for your patience. Ric -- ================================================ My father, Victor Moore (Vic) used to say: "There are two Great Sins in the world... ..the Sin of Ignorance, and the Sin of Stupidity. Only the former may be overcome." R.I.P. Dad. Linux user# 44256 Sign up at: http://counter.li.org/ http://www.sourceforge.net/projects/oar http://www.wayward4now.net <---down4now too ================================================

16 years, 3 months

Re: dnsmasq for caching, now: fedora wireless "out of the box"

by Tim

On Sun, 2007-11-18 at 23:16 -0700, kwhiskerz wrote: > Any ideas, anyone, while on the networking topic, what wireless cards > work with fedora? > > I read an article on the web that said that there are some wireless > network cards that work with fedora "out of the box". An Intel WM3945ABG did for me. -- (This computer runs FC7, my others run FC4, FC5 & FC6, in case that's important to the thread.) Don't send private replies to my address, the mailbox is ignored. I read messages from the public lists.

16 years, 5 months

users search results for query "dnsmasq"