[389-devel] [PATCH] Add require secure binds switch.

[Andrey Ivanov]

Does it mean that when "nsslapd-require-secure-binds" is "on" then even the
anonymous binds should be made by SSL? Maybe there is some sense in leaving
a possibility to have anonymous binds non-SSL and frocing non-anonymous ones
to be secure?

2009/5/15 Rich Megginson <rmeggins at redhat.com>

> Nathan Kinder wrote:
>
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> --
>> Fedora-directory-devel mailing list
>> Fedora-directory-devel at redhat.com
>> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-directory-devel
>>
> Looks good.
>
> --
> Fedora-directory-devel mailing list
> Fedora-directory-devel at redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-directory-devel
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/389-devel/attachments/20090515/e3fa48ba/attachment.html