[389-devel] strcasestr vs. PL_strcasestr
Carsten Grzemba
grzemba at contac-dt.de
Fri Mar 7 14:15:53 UTC 2014
Hi Nathan,
is there special reason why you use strcasestr in ACL plugin instead of PL_strcasestr.
It presents me some headache to build 1.3.2 on Solaris 10.
https://git.fedorahosted.org/cgit/389/ds.git/commit/ldap/servers/plugins/acl?id=95214606df95deb1cf9a30044fe64f780c030b34
Carsten
Am 06.03.14 schrieb Noriko Hosoi <nhosoi at redhat.com>:
> https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/47731
>
> https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/47731/0001-Ticket-47731-A-tombstone-entry-is-deleted-by-ldapdel.patch
>
> Description: A tombstone deletion by ldapdelete op from client is
> supposed to fail. The failure from SLAPI_PLUGIN_BETXNPOSTOPERATION was
> ignored in 389-ds-base-1.2.11 plugin_call_func and it was not passed to
> the backend to abort. This patch added the check in the same way as in
> 389-ds-base-1.3.1 and newer.
> --
> 389-devel mailing list
> 389-devel at lists.fedoraproject.org
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/389-devel/attachments/20140307/2a575f23/attachment.html>
More information about the 389-devel
mailing list