[Fedora-directory-users] leak
Frits Hoogland
frits.hoogland at gmail.com
Mon Aug 21 14:33:19 UTC 2006
Yes. Version 1.0.2. Yes using SSL. os: Debian GNU/Linux 3.1 (aka sarge)
On 8/21/06, Richard Megginson <rmeggins at redhat.com> wrote:
>
> Frits Hoogland wrote:
> > Same here, 'reasonable' usage, constant leaking.
> > We are using multimaster replication.
> >
> > Haven't had any responses, though.
> Are you guys using SSL? What OS version? I'm assuming you are using
> FDS 1.0.2.
> >
> > frits
> >
> > On 8/21/06, * Jason Russler* <jrussler at helix.nih.gov
> > <mailto:jrussler at helix.nih.gov>> wrote:
> >
> > I've seen one recent mention on this list about leaks in the
> directory
> > server but I have a ns-slapd process that grows by dozens of
> > megabytes a
> > day. At least once a week I restart the directory server after it
> > eats
> > up ~90% of the system memory. Right now it's a 1.2G process and
> > it sure
> > isn't cached data because there are not that many entries in this
> > thing. I don't recall the issue being this extreme when I first
> > set it
> > up. Cold the leak be associated with replication or some other
> > subsystem not active in a fresh install?
> > --
> > Jason Russler
> > Helix Systems, NIH, DHHS
> >
> > --
> > Fedora-directory-users mailing list
> > Fedora-directory-users at redhat.com
> > <mailto:Fedora-directory-users at redhat.com>
> > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-directory-users
> >
> >
> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> > --
> > Fedora-directory-users mailing list
> > Fedora-directory-users at redhat.com
> > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-directory-users
> >
>
>
> --
> Fedora-directory-users mailing list
> Fedora-directory-users at redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-directory-users
>
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/389-users/attachments/20060821/31b1e362/attachment.html>
More information about the 389-users
mailing list