[Fedora-directory-users] RE: Fedora-directory-users Digest, Vol 19, Issue 3
t b
mxheadroom at hotmail.com
Mon Dec 4 15:47:19 UTC 2006
>From: fedora-directory-users-request at redhat.com
>Reply-To: fedora-directory-users at redhat.com
>To: fedora-directory-users at redhat.com
>Subject: Fedora-directory-users Digest, Vol 19, Issue 3
>Date: Sat, 2 Dec 2006 12:00:05 -0500 (EST)
>
>Send Fedora-directory-users mailing list submissions to
> fedora-directory-users at redhat.com
>
>To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-directory-users
>or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> fedora-directory-users-request at redhat.com
>
>You can reach the person managing the list at
> fedora-directory-users-owner at redhat.com
>
>When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
>than "Re: Contents of Fedora-directory-users digest..."
>
>
>Today's Topics:
>
> 1. Re: RE: Fedora-directory-users Digest, Vol 19, Issue 1
> (Richard Megginson)
> 2. Re: AD + FDS sync stops working? (To Ngan)
> 3. Re: Memory usage (koniczynek)
>
>
>----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>Message: 1
>Date: Fri, 01 Dec 2006 12:55:24 -0700
>From: Richard Megginson <rmeggins at redhat.com>
>Subject: Re: [Fedora-directory-users] RE: Fedora-directory-users
> Digest, Vol 19, Issue 1
>To: "General discussion list for the Fedora Directory server project."
> <fedora-directory-users at redhat.com>
>Message-ID: <457088AC.1030004 at redhat.com>
>Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
>
>t b wrote:
> > My logs seem to indicate that the connection is being encrypted; I can
> > ssh to a client server and get the password prompt, but when I enter
> > the password it just returns me to the password prompt again
> >
> > [01/Dec/2006:19:47:44 -0500] conn=650 fd=69 slot=69 connection from
> > xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx to xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx
> > [01/Dec/2006:19:47:44 -0500] conn=650 op=0 EXT
> > oid="1.3.6.1.4.1.1466.20037" name="startTLS"
> > [01/Dec/2006:19:47:44 -0500] conn=650 op=0 RESULT err=0 tag=120
> > nentries=0 etime=0
> > [01/Dec/2006:19:47:44 -0500] conn=650 SSL 256-bit AES
>All of this means the client was able to successfully perform the
>startTLS extended operation and start using SSL.
> > [01/Dec/2006:19:47:44 -0500] conn=650 op=1 UNBIND
> > [01/Dec/2006:19:47:44 -0500] conn=650 op=1 fd=69 closed - U1
>The UNBIND means the client had a problem and closed the connection.
>Does the client print any errors? Are there any messages in the server
>error log?
On the client server it show,
sshd[24149]: Failed password for invalid user xxxxx from xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx
port xxx ssh2
> >
> > If I disable TLS everything works fine, the client server can query
> > the FDS and auth the client properly
> >
> > I am not sure if the problem has to do with the pam_ldap not properly
> > formatted or the cert file not in proper format
> >
> > Does anyone have an example of what the pam_ldap config should look
> > like? or suggestions on checking whether the cert file is in proper
> > format
>I'm not sure. PAM needs the ca cert of the CA that issued the directory
>server server cert. See
>http://directory.fedora.redhat.com/wiki/Howto:SSL for more information.
> >
That was the info I used to do the SSL setup, but I only see a part of the
log output they indicated,
Their logs,
[18/Jul/2005:20:33:36 -0400] conn=4 op=0 EXT oid="1.3.6.1.4.1.1466.20037"
name="startTLS"
[18/Jul/2005:20:33:36 -0400] conn=4 op=0 RESULT err=0 tag=120 nentries=0
etime=0
[18/Jul/2005:20:33:36 -0400] conn=4 SSL 256-bit AES
[18/Jul/2005:20:33:36 -0400] conn=4 op=1 BIND dn="" method=128 version=3
[18/Jul/2005:20:33:36 -0400] conn=4 op=1 RESULT err=0 tag=97 nentries=0
etime=0 dn=""
[18/Jul/2005:20:33:36 -0400] conn=4 op=2 SRCH base="dc=example,dc=com"
scope=2 filter="(uid=testuser)" attrs=ALL
My Logs,
[04/Dec/2006:14:35:52 -0500] conn=757 op=0 EXT oid="1.3.6.1.4.1.1466.20037"
name="startTLS"
[04/Dec/2006:14:35:52 -0500] conn=757 op=0 RESULT err=0 tag=120 nentries=0
etime=0
[04/Dec/2006:14:35:52 -0500] conn=757 SSL 256-bit AES
[04/Dec/2006:14:35:52 -0500] conn=757 op=1 UNBIND
[04/Dec/2006:14:35:52 -0500] conn=757 op=1 fd=71 closed - U1
For some reason my setup dies just before querying the FDS to determine user
details
Do you know of any tests that I can run just on the client server to
determine proper confuguration?
> > Also what's the UNBIND shown in the logs?
> >
> > Thanks
> >
> >> From: fedora-directory-users-request at redhat.com
> >> Reply-To: fedora-directory-users at redhat.com
> >> To: fedora-directory-users at redhat.com
> >> Subject: Fedora-directory-users Digest, Vol 19, Issue 1
> >> Date: Fri, 1 Dec 2006 12:00:06 -0500 (EST)
> >>
> >> Send Fedora-directory-users mailing list submissions to
> >> fedora-directory-users at redhat.com
> >>
> >> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> >> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-directory-users
> >> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> >> fedora-directory-users-request at redhat.com
> >>
> >> You can reach the person managing the list at
> >> fedora-directory-users-owner at redhat.com
> >>
> >> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> >> than "Re: Contents of Fedora-directory-users digest..."
> >>
> >>
> >> Today's Topics:
> >>
> >> 1. pam_ldap with SSL/TLS (t b)
> >> 2. RE: pam_ldap with SSL/TLS (Morris, Patrick)
> >> 3. Re: pam_ldap with SSL/TLS (Richard Megginson)
> >> 4. Problem with SSL console in X in specific circumstances
> >> (Philip Kime)
> >> 5. FW: [Fedora-directory-users] Extracting details from
> >> ActiveDirectoryto FDS (Paxton, Darren)
> >> 6. alias in fedora directory server (patrick ndjientcheu ngandjui)
> >> 7. Re: FW: [Fedora-directory-users] Extracting details from
> >> ActiveDirectoryto FDS (Nicholas Byrne)
> >> 8. Re: Memory usage (koniczynek)
> >> 9. Re: Memory usage (David Boreham)
> >> 10. Re: Memory usage (koniczynek)
> >>
> >>
> >> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>
> >> Message: 1
> >> Date: Thu, 30 Nov 2006 12:31:50 -0500
> >> From: "t b" <mxheadroom at hotmail.com>
> >> Subject: [Fedora-directory-users] pam_ldap with SSL/TLS
> >> To: fedora-directory-users at redhat.com
> >> Message-ID: <BAY116-F322745E96D702ED748B1D0CDDB0 at phx.gbl>
> >> Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed
> >>
> >> I am trying to setup pam_ldap to use TLS to communicate with the FDS,
> >> but
> >> having lots of problems doing so; it works if I use the unencrypted
> >> way but
> >> not if I use ldaps ( port 636 )
> >>
> >> I used the instructions at,
> >> http://directory.fedora.redhat.com/wiki/Howto:PAM
> >>
> >> Has anyone gotten PAM to work TLS
> >>
> >>
> >> Thanks
> >>
> >> _________________________________________________________________
> >> Buy, Load, Play. The new Sympatico / MSN Music Store works seamlessly
> >> with
> >> Windows Media Player. Just Click PLAY.
> >>
>http://musicstore.sympatico.msn.ca/content/viewer.aspx?cid=SMS_Sept192006
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> ------------------------------
> >>
> >> Message: 2
> >> Date: Thu, 30 Nov 2006 13:00:56 -0500
> >> From: "Morris, Patrick" <patrick.morris at hp.com>
> >> Subject: RE: [Fedora-directory-users] pam_ldap with SSL/TLS
> >> To: "General discussion list for the Fedora Directory server project."
> >> <fedora-directory-users at redhat.com>
> >> Message-ID:
> >>
><CD18C81835E18A40A64C4A0D16A237BE05FE850D at ATAEXC01.americas.cpqcorp.net>
> >>
> >>
> >> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
> >>
> >> > I am trying to setup pam_ldap to use TLS to communicate with
> >> > the FDS, but having lots of problems doing so; it works if I
> >> > use the unencrypted way but not if I use ldaps ( port 636 )
> >>
> >> Someone should jump in here and correct me if I'm wrong, but I believe
> >> it's normal for TLS connections to happen on the standard LDAP port.
> >> You should be able to tell from your logs whether the connection is
> >> encrypted or not.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> ------------------------------
> >>
> >> Message: 3
> >> Date: Thu, 30 Nov 2006 11:08:08 -0700
> >> From: Richard Megginson <rmeggins at redhat.com>
> >> Subject: Re: [Fedora-directory-users] pam_ldap with SSL/TLS
> >> To: "General discussion list for the Fedora Directory server project."
> >> <fedora-directory-users at redhat.com>
> >> Message-ID: <456F1E08.40601 at redhat.com>
> >> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
> >>
> >> Morris, Patrick wrote:
> >> >> I am trying to setup pam_ldap to use TLS to communicate with
> >> >> the FDS, but having lots of problems doing so; it works if I
> >> >> use the unencrypted way but not if I use ldaps ( port 636 )
> >> >>
> >> >
> >> > Someone should jump in here and correct me if I'm wrong, but I
>believe
> >> > it's normal for TLS connections to happen on the standard LDAP port.
> >> > You should be able to tell from your logs whether the connection is
> >> > encrypted or not.
> >> >
> >> Yes. The LDAP "preferred" way is to use the startTLS extended
>operation
> >> which starts a TLS session on the non-secure port. This will be logged
> >> in the access log.
> >> > --
> >> > Fedora-directory-users mailing list
> >> > Fedora-directory-users at redhat.com
> >> > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-directory-users
> >> >
> >> -------------- next part --------------
> >> A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
> >> Name: smime.p7s
> >> Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature
> >> Size: 3178 bytes
> >> Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
> >> Url :
> >>
>https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-directory-users/attachments/20061130/0634e78a/smime.bin
> >>
> >>
> >> ------------------------------
> >>
> >> Message: 4
> >> Date: Thu, 30 Nov 2006 18:02:55 -0800
> >> From: "Philip Kime" <pkime at Shopzilla.com>
> >> Subject: [Fedora-directory-users] Problem with SSL console in X in
> >> specific circumstances
> >> To: <fedora-directory-users at redhat.com>
> >> Message-ID:
> >> <9C0091F428E697439E7A773FFD083427435BE3 at szexchange.Shopzilla.inc>
> >> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
> >>
> >> Here's the problem:
> >>
> >> Running startconsole (SSL) to a remote display on a PC X-server
>(xwin32)
> >> works fine and requires that my windows home dir on the PC X-server
> >> machine has .fedora-console/ containing cert8.db and key3.db, as you'd
> >> expect. If I rename this dir, the console hangs at the splash screen.
>So
> >> far, so good, all makes sense.
> >>
> >> If I try the same thing to cygwin's X server on same machine or to an X
> >> server on a Mac running OSX, startconsole always hangs as if it can't
> >> find ~/.fedora-console on the local machine. I've tried copying this
>dir
> >> to what cygwin/OSX thinks is the user's home dir but no luck. Where
> >> should I put the Cert db files under "real" UNIX X to get the SSL
> >> console to work? Also tried ~/.mmc as per the docs but I could never
>get
> >> this to work.
> >>
> >> PK
> >>
> >> --
> >> Philip Kime
> >> NOPS Systems Architect
> >> 310 401 0407
> >>
> >> -------------- next part --------------
> >> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> >> URL:
> >>
>https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-directory-users/attachments/20061130/054ecbd6/attachment.html
> >>
> >>
> >> ------------------------------
> >>
> >> Message: 5
> >> Date: Fri, 1 Dec 2006 08:04:30 -0000
> >> From: "Paxton, Darren" <Darren.Paxton at mercer.com>
> >> Subject: FW: [Fedora-directory-users] Extracting details from
> >> ActiveDirectoryto FDS
> >> To: <Fedora-directory-users at redhat.com>
> >> Message-ID:
> >> <52F7C07B119CF4439B7EFBFE0FB3256B027CBD02 at eidwpexms06.mercer.com>
> >> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
> >>
> >> Skipped content of type multipart/alternative-------------- next part
> >> --------------
> >> --
> >> Fedora-directory-users mailing list
> >> Fedora-directory-users at redhat.com
> >> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-directory-users
> >>
> >> ------------------------------
> >>
> >> Message: 6
> >> Date: Fri, 1 Dec 2006 08:10:42 +0000 (GMT)
> >> From: patrick ndjientcheu ngandjui <tchen_pat at yahoo.fr>
> >> Subject: [Fedora-directory-users] alias in fedora directory server
> >> To: Fedora-directory-users at redhat.com
> >> Message-ID: <20061201081042.78578.qmail at web25801.mail.ukl.yahoo.com>
> >> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
> >>
> >> Hi,
> >> I would like to know how to use alias in fedora directory server.It
> >> seems that it is used for point to another entry in the directory,but
> >> i don't know how to use this feature.May someone helps me on this
> >> issue? I would really appreciate an example.
> >>
> >> Thanks
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
>___________________________________________________________________________
> >>
> >> Découvrez une nouvelle façon d'obtenir des réponses à toutes vos
> >> questions !
> >> Profitez des connaissances, des opinions et des expériences des
> >> internautes sur Yahoo! Questions/Réponses
> >> http://fr.answers.yahoo.com
> >> -------------- next part --------------
> >> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> >> URL:
> >>
>https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-directory-users/attachments/20061201/0fa54e4f/attachment.html
> >>
> >>
> >> ------------------------------
> >>
> >> Message: 7
> >> Date: Fri, 01 Dec 2006 11:50:13 +0000
> >> From: Nicholas Byrne <nicholas.byrne at quadriga.com>
> >> Subject: Re: FW: [Fedora-directory-users] Extracting details from
> >> ActiveDirectoryto FDS
> >> To: "General discussion list for the Fedora Directory server project."
> >> <fedora-directory-users at redhat.com>
> >> Message-ID: <457016F5.5030202 at quadriga.com>
> >> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
> >>
> >> Your messages got through - you can confirm by checking the archives -
> >> https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-directory-users/
> >>
> >> I'm a new user as well so i'm afraid i can't answer your question, but
> >> if you keep asking i'm sure someone will know!
> >> Nick
> >>
> >> Paxton, Darren wrote:
> >> > Apologies for mailing yet again, however either my messages are not
> >> > getting through (something I don't believe as I keep getting the post
> >> > to the mailing list) - or for some reason, no one is willing to even
> >> > acknowledge my issue.
> >> >
> >> > In the spirit of the community - can someone at least acknowledge a
> >> > message as I find it quite disheartening that I have had no replies
>at
> >> > all even if just to point me somewhere for assistance.
> >> >
> >> >
> >>
>------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> > *From:* fedora-directory-users-bounces at redhat.com
> >> > [mailto:fedora-directory-users-bounces at redhat.com] *On Behalf Of
> >> > *Paxton, Darren
> >> > *Sent:* 30 November 2006 08:46
> >> > *To:* General discussion list for the Fedora Directory server
>project.
> >> > *Subject:* RE: [Fedora-directory-users] Extracting details from
> >> > ActiveDirectoryto FDS
> >> >
> >> > Hi
> >> >
> >> > Has anyone had any thoughts on my query or can point me in the right
> >> > direction?
> >> >
> >> > As is the nature of AD, I would have thought it is possible to
>extract
> >> > this information using a scope setting or something similar.
> >> >
> >> > Thanks
> >> >
> >> > Darren
> >> >
> >> >
> >>
>------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> > *From:* fedora-directory-users-bounces at redhat.com
> >> > [mailto:fedora-directory-users-bounces at redhat.com] *On Behalf Of
> >> > *Paxton, Darren
> >> > *Sent:* 24 November 2006 14:56
> >> > *To:* fedora-directory-users at redhat.com
> >> > *Subject:* [Fedora-directory-users] Extracting details from
>Active
> >> > Directoryto FDS
> >> >
> >> > Hi all,
> >> >
> >> > I've been tinkering with integrating our Linux devices into our
>AD
> >> > domain for some time and I've hit a few brick walls, however I've
> >> > recently discovered FDS and the synchronisation features with AD.
> >> >
> >> > I've managed to set up a few replication jobs, however due to the
> >> > extensive nature of our AD, I've realised that the sync only
>takes
> >> > the group and user objects from the OU or CN being specified.
> >> >
> >> > Is there any way I can specify that it should traverse all
> >> > subtrees of an OU and extract all that information back into FDS?
> >> >
> >> > Thanks
> >> >
> >> > Darren
> >> >
> >> > --
> >> > Darren Paxton
> >> > EMEA Tier2
> >> > Red Hat Certified Engineer
> >> > VMware Certified Professional
> >> > MGTI Centralised ops
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > This e-mail and any attachments may be confidential or legally
> >> > privileged.If you received this message in error or are not the
> >> > intended recipient, you should destroy the email message and any
> >> > attachments or copies, and you are prohibited from retaining,
> >> > distributing, disclosing or using any information contained herein.
> >> > Please inform us of the erroneous delivery by return e-mail. Thank
>you
> >> > for your co-operation.
> >> >
> >> > Mercer Human Resource Consulting Limited is authorised and regulated
> >> > by the Financial Services Authority. Registered in England No.
>984275.
> >> > Registered Office: 1 Tower Place West, Tower Place, London, EC3R 5BU.
> >> >
> >> >
> >>
>------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> >
> >> > --
> >> > Fedora-directory-users mailing list
> >> > Fedora-directory-users at redhat.com
> >> > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-directory-users
> >> >
> >> >
> >>
>------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> >
> >> > --
> >> > Fedora-directory-users mailing list
> >> > Fedora-directory-users at redhat.com
> >> > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-directory-users
> >> >
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> This e-mail is the property of Quadriga Worldwide Ltd, intended for
> >> the addressee only and confidential. Any dissemination, copying or
> >> distribution of this message or any attachments is strictly prohibited.
> >>
> >> If you have received this message in error, please notify us
> >> immediately by replying to the message and deleting it from your
> >> computer.
> >>
> >> Messages sent to and from Quadriga may be monitored.
> >>
> >> Quadriga cannot guarantee any message delivery method is secure or
> >> error-free. Information could be intercepted, corrupted, lost,
> >> destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses.
> >>
> >> We do not accept responsibility for any errors or omissions in this
> >> message and/or attachment that arise as a result of transmission.
> >>
> >> You should carry out your own virus checks before opening any
> >> attachment.
> >>
> >> Any views or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do
> >> not necessarily represent those of Quadriga.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> ------------------------------
> >>
> >> Message: 8
> >> Date: Fri, 01 Dec 2006 16:45:28 +0100
> >> From: koniczynek <koniczynek at uaznia.net>
> >> Subject: Re: [Fedora-directory-users] Memory usage
> >> To: "General discussion list for the Fedora Directory server project."
> >> <fedora-directory-users at redhat.com>
> >> Message-ID: <45704E18.3070705 at uaznia.net>
> >> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-2; format=flowed
> >>
> >> Richard Megginson napisa³(a):
> >> > This is an excellent cache/memory tuning document from a Sun
>employee,
> >> > primarily targeted to Sun DS users, but almost all of the
> >> information is
> >> > relevant to Fedora DS (since they share a common lineage).
> >> >
> >> > http://www.directorymanager.org/blogs/ds_cache_sizing.pdf
> >> Lets say I heven't got much time lately so without thinking I've
>changed
> >> in dse.ldif
> >> nsslapd-import-cache-autosize from -1 to 1 and after restarting I've
> >> started to receive errors like: "3 Time limit exceeded" Someone do know
> >> what to do? ;)
> >>
> >> --
> >> xmpp/email: koniczynek at uaznia.net
> >> xmpp/email: koniczynek at gmail.com
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> ------------------------------
> >>
> >> Message: 9
> >> Date: Fri, 01 Dec 2006 09:15:14 -0700
> >> From: David Boreham <david_list at boreham.org>
> >> Subject: Re: [Fedora-directory-users] Memory usage
> >> To: "General discussion list for the Fedora Directory server project."
> >> <fedora-directory-users at redhat.com>
> >> Message-ID: <45705512.4070808 at boreham.org>
> >> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-2; format=flowed
> >>
> >> koniczynek wrote:
> >>
> >> > Richard Megginson napisa³(a):
> >> >
> >> >> This is an excellent cache/memory tuning document from a Sun
> >> >> employee, primarily targeted to Sun DS users, but almost all of the
> >> >> information is relevant to Fedora DS (since they share a common
> >> >> lineage).
> >> >>
> >> >> http://www.directorymanager.org/blogs/ds_cache_sizing.pdf
> >> >
> >> > Lets say I heven't got much time lately so without thinking I've
> >> > changed in dse.ldif
> >> > nsslapd-import-cache-autosize from -1 to 1 and after restarting I've
> >> > started to receive errors like: "3 Time limit exceeded" Someone do
> >> > know what to do? ;)
> >> >
> >> Change it back ?
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> ------------------------------
> >>
> >> Message: 10
> >> Date: Fri, 01 Dec 2006 17:53:22 +0100
> >> From: koniczynek <koniczynek at uaznia.net>
> >> Subject: Re: [Fedora-directory-users] Memory usage
> >> To: "General discussion list for the Fedora Directory server project."
> >> <fedora-directory-users at redhat.com>
> >> Message-ID: <45705E02.7020709 at uaznia.net>
> >> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-2
> >>
> >> David Boreham, dnia 2006-12-01 17:15 napisal:
> >> >> Lets say I heven't got much time lately so without thinking I've
> >> >> changed in dse.ldif
> >> >> nsslapd-import-cache-autosize from -1 to 1 and after restarting I've
> >> >> started to receive errors like: "3 Time limit exceeded" Someone do
> >> >> know what to do? ;)
> >> > Change it back ?
> >> man, please, show some respect ;) I did change it back, but to no
>avail.
> >> Also I can say (to stop further questions): yes, I've stopped the
>server
> >> before change.
> >>
> >> --
> >> email/xmpp: koniczynek at uaznia.net
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> ------------------------------
> >>
> >> --
> >> Fedora-directory-users mailing list
> >> Fedora-directory-users at redhat.com
> >> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-directory-users
> >>
> >>
> >> End of Fedora-directory-users Digest, Vol 19, Issue 1
> >> *****************************************************
> >
> > _________________________________________________________________
> > Off to school, going on a trip, or moving? Windows Live (MSN)
> > Messenger lets you stay in touch with friends and family wherever you
> > go. Click here to find out how to sign up!
> > http://www.telusmobility.com/msnxbox/
> >
> > --
> > Fedora-directory-users mailing list
> > Fedora-directory-users at redhat.com
> > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-directory-users
>-------------- next part --------------
>A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
>Name: smime.p7s
>Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature
>Size: 3178 bytes
>Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
>Url :
>https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-directory-users/attachments/20061201/7d15c5b4/smime.bin
>
>------------------------------
>
>Message: 2
>Date: Fri, 01 Dec 2006 15:23:28 -0800
>From: To Ngan <tngan at redhat.com>
>Subject: Re: [Fedora-directory-users] AD + FDS sync stops working?
>To: "General discussion list for the Fedora Directory server project."
> <fedora-directory-users at redhat.com>
>Message-ID: <4570B970.3070901 at redhat.com>
>Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"
>
>Dan Oglesby wrote:
> > I tried the following:
> >
> > In windows registry->HKLM->Software->PasswordSync, try add string value
>“Log
> > Level” and set it to “1”. Restart the passsync service. This should
>log
> > all transactions and errors. Turn this back to "0" and restart passsync
> > after troubleshooting.
> >
> > All I see in the log is this:
> >
> > 11/30/06 09:12:58: begin log
> > 11/30/06 09:12:59: 0 new entries loaded from file
> > 11/30/06 09:14:20: 0 new entries loaded from file
> > 11/30/06 09:14:20: 0 entries saved to file
> > 11/30/06 09:14:20: end log
> > 11/30/06 09:14:22: begin log
> > 11/30/06 09:14:22: 0 new entries loaded from file
> >
> > That’s after restarting the passsync service twice, and changing a
>user’s
> > password in AD four times.
> >
>
>Hmm... 2 Windows sync stopped working together after 6 months. Any cert
>on AD or DS side expired?
>--
>toto
>
>-------------- next part --------------
>A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
>Name: smime.p7s
>Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature
>Size: 3233 bytes
>Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
>Url :
>https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-directory-users/attachments/20061201/b9f1ea83/smime.bin
>
>------------------------------
>
>Message: 3
>Date: Sat, 02 Dec 2006 09:28:17 +0100
>From: koniczynek <koniczynek at uaznia.net>
>Subject: Re: [Fedora-directory-users] Memory usage
>To: "General discussion list for the Fedora Directory server project."
> <fedora-directory-users at redhat.com>
>Message-ID: <45713921.1080009 at uaznia.net>
>Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-2
>
>Richard Megginson, dnia 2006-12-01 18:00 napisal:
> >> man, please, show some respect ;) I did change it back, but to no
>avail.
> >> Also I can say (to stop further questions): yes, I've stopped the
>server
> >> before change.
> >>
> > What types of searches are returning time limit exceeded? Can you post
> > relevant excerpts from the access and error logs?
>I'm "benchmarking" my FDS with "ldapsearch -x" and earlier it worked and
>now it does not. In error logs there were "err=3" but I don't remember
>much more and I'll have access to the logs on Monday, so till then, only
> I can provide only this information (because I do not remember anything
>more ;) )
>
>--
>email/xmpp: koniczynek at uaznia.net
>
>
>
>------------------------------
>
>--
>Fedora-directory-users mailing list
>Fedora-directory-users at redhat.com
>https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-directory-users
>
>
>End of Fedora-directory-users Digest, Vol 19, Issue 3
>*****************************************************
_________________________________________________________________
Off to school, going on a trip, or moving? Windows Live (MSN) Messenger lets
you stay in touch with friends and family wherever you go. Click here to
find out how to sign up! http://www.telusmobility.com/msnxbox/
More information about the 389-users
mailing list