[Fedora-directory-users] admin-serv error log

[Richard Megginson]

Jeff Gamsby wrote:
>
>
>>>
>> I think that you are getting hung up on a display issue.  The 
>> supplier is just listed as a string to identify the instance.  The 
>> synchronization is always[*] initiated from the FDS side, so as long 
>> as you are trying to connect to AD via SSL, everything will be 
>> encrypted.
>>
>> [*] The one exception to this is the PassSync service installed on 
>> the windows side.  You need to configure this to connect to FDS over 
>> the SSL port.
>>
>> -NGK
>>
> OK, but when I set it up this way and I check the replication logs, I 
> see the suppliers port, and it's listed as 389. When configuring 
> PassSync, I do put it in secure mode with the secure port. So it 
> doesn't matter, since the PassSync config is set to SSL, and the FDS 
> to AD has to be SSL, then that 389 is just an identifier?
Yes.
>
> Jeff
>
> -- 
> Fedora-directory-users mailing list
> Fedora-directory-users at redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-directory-users
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature
Size: 3178 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
URL: <http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/389-users/attachments/20060620/1f0c0096/attachment.bin>