[Fedora-directory-users] solaris, dtlogin, and FDS

Susan logastellus at yahoo.com
Fri May 26 15:42:10 UTC 2006


yes -- root.

--- Paul Clayton <Paul.Clayton at intecbilling.com> wrote:

> But can you use files based users with this method 'cause I can't. 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: fedora-directory-users-bounces at redhat.com
> [mailto:fedora-directory-users-bounces at redhat.com] On Behalf Of Susan
> Sent: 26 May 2006 05:07 PM
> To: General discussion list for the Fedora Directory server project.
> Subject: Re: [Fedora-directory-users] solaris, dtlogin, and FDS
> 
> I have this and my dtlogin works fine:
> 
> 
> # Default definitions for Authentication management # Used when service
> name is not explicitly mentioned for authentication #
> other   auth requisite          pam_authtok_get.so.1    
> other   auth required           pam_dhkeys.so.1 
> other   auth required           pam_unix_cred.so.1      
> other   auth sufficient         pam_unix_auth.so.1      
> other   auth required           pam_ldap.so.1   
> #
> 
> 
> --- Sam Smith <sam.smith at ece.gatech.edu> wrote:
> 
> > I have a bunch of fully patched and up-to-date Solaris 2.9 machines, 
> > using an FDS ldap server. I just converted them over from NIS, thanks 
> > to the help from the documentation on the web site.
> > 
> > I can login at the command line, I can ssh to them, I thought 
> > everything was working great.
> > 
> > But when I sit down in front of the console, and try to login with 
> > dtlogin to CDE (the gui), it kicks me out.
> > 
> > It's using the "other" lines from my pam.conf, which look like this:
> > 
> > #
> > # Default definitions for Authentication management # Used when 
> > service name is not explicitly mentioned for authentication #
> > other   auth requisite        pam_authtok_get.so.1
> > other   auth required         pam_dhkeys.so.1
> > other   auth binding          pam_unix_auth.so.1 server_policy
> > other   auth required         pam_ldap.so.1
> > 
> > If I look at the log file in the FDS server ("access"), everything 
> > looks fine.
> > 
> > Has anyone else had a problem with dtlogin?
> > 
> > Thanks for any help,
> > Sam
> > 
> > --
> > Fedora-directory-users mailing list
> > Fedora-directory-users at redhat.com
> > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-directory-users
> > 
> 
> 
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
> http://mail.yahoo.com 
> 
> --
> Fedora-directory-users mailing list
> Fedora-directory-users at redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-directory-users
> --------------------------------------------------------
> 
> This e-mail and any attachments are confidential and may also be legally
> privileged and/or copyright material of Intec Telecom Systems PLC (or its
> affiliated companies). If you are not an intended or authorised recipient
> of this e-mail or have received it in error, please delete it immediately
> and notify the sender by e-mail. In such a case, reading, reproducing,
> printing or further dissemination of this e-mail or its contents is strictly
> prohibited and may be unlawful.
> Intec Telecom Systems PLC does not represent or warrant that an attachment
> hereto is free from computer viruses or other defects. The opinions
> expressed in this e-mail and any attachments may be those of the author and
> are not necessarily those of Intec Telecom Systems PLC.
> 
> --
> Fedora-directory-users mailing list
> Fedora-directory-users at redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-directory-users
> 


__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com 




More information about the 389-users mailing list