[Fedora-directory-users] Fedora directory and solaris 10
Richard Megginson
rmeggins at redhat.com
Wed Oct 11 23:07:27 UTC 2006
George Holbert wrote:
>>
>> I guess my question is can I use Sun directory server on
>> one box as master, then another box (doing the multi-master replication)
>> running fedora directory?
>
> My understanding is that would not work. You would want all servers
> running either SunDS or FDS.
FDS replication is compatible with SunDS 5.1 and earlier replication. I
believe SunDS 5.2 has some sort of legacy replication mode that lets it
talk to SunDS 5.1. So it is possible.
>
>
>
> James Greene wrote:
>> I can do that, but I guess my question is can I use Sun directory
>> server on
>> one box as master, then another box (doing the multi-master replication)
>> running fedora directory? I know they both are based on the same
>> code, but
>> not sure if that would work or not.
>>
>>
>> On 10/11/06 4:07 PM, "Scott Roberts" <rinconsystems at yahoo.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>>> Why? I know I will get kicked in the face for
>>> mentioning this... but the major OS's have their own
>>> directory servers, Red Hat has one now as we all know,
>>> and Sun has one too. Just use the sun directory server
>>> on solaris, its free, the support is not.
>>>
>>> --- James Greene <jwgreene at megalink.net> wrote:
>>>
>
>
> --
> Fedora-directory-users mailing list
> Fedora-directory-users at redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-directory-users
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature
Size: 3178 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
URL: <http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/389-users/attachments/20061011/6d85dfb6/attachment.bin>
More information about the 389-users
mailing list