[Fedora-directory-users] cache sizing and db2ldif, db2bak

Richard Megginson rmeggins at redhat.com
Fri Aug 17 20:51:54 UTC 2007


George Holbert wrote:
>
> Do db2ldif or db2bak utilize the database or entry caches?
No, they operate directly on the database files.  That is, they don't 
grab data from RAM, they expect the data is already on disk.
> I'm wondering whether it makes any sense to tune these higher on a 
> replica dedicated just for backups.
>
> Thank you!
> -- George
>
>
> -- 
> Fedora-directory-users mailing list
> Fedora-directory-users at redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-directory-users

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature
Size: 3245 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
URL: <http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/389-users/attachments/20070817/1458eaf6/attachment.bin>


More information about the 389-users mailing list