[Fedora-directory-users] Re: Fedora-directory-users Digest, Vol 26, Issue 9
surendhar surya
surendharsurya at yahoo.co.in
Wed Jul 11 09:05:37 UTC 2007
Thank you for information. I have fixed the issue finally once i run the authconfig and configured ldap server details.
Now i have a problem! when i try to add windows clinet machine in FDS it give a error message.
fedora-directory-users-request at redhat.com wrote:
Send Fedora-directory-users mailing list submissions to
fedora-directory-users at redhat.com
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-directory-users
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
fedora-directory-users-request at redhat.com
You can reach the person managing the list at
fedora-directory-users-owner at redhat.com
When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of Fedora-directory-users digest..."
Today's Topics:
1. Re: Admin Server connecting to two Directory Servers within
the same domain (Daryle A. Tilroe)
2. Re: Admin Server connecting to two Directory Servers within
the same domain (Richard Megginson)
3. Re: Admin Server connecting to two Directory Servers within
the same domain (Daryle A. Tilroe)
4. Re: Admin Server connecting to two Directory Servers within
the same domain (Richard Megginson)
5. Regarding fds with samba (surendhar surya)
6. No X (Vampire D)
7. Re: Regarding fds with samba (Ivan Ferreira)
8. Re: No X (Richard Megginson)
9. add new customer to Quickbooks from Directory Server
(Darren Fulton - CTI)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Message: 1
Date: Mon, 09 Jul 2007 10:30:11 -0600
From: "Daryle A. Tilroe"
Subject: Re: [Fedora-directory-users] Admin Server connecting to two
Directory Servers within the same domain
To: "General discussion list for the Fedora Directory server project."
Message-ID: <46926293.2070806 at micralyne.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Joel Heenan wrote:
> On Sat, 2007-07-07 at 00:14 +1000, Richard Megginson wrote:
>
>>How did you create your directory server instances? Usually the first
>>one you create is your Configuration Directory Server, the one the
>>console uses as sort of a network registry (the o=NetscapeRoot suffix).
>>Subsequent directory server instance creation should use this one
>>instead of creating a new Config DS. The setup program should give you
>>these options.
I have a closely related question. Is there a correct way in a simple
dual multimaster setup to have the two servers both be config servers
for the same DB? I tried just replicating NetscapeRoot but I ended up
with things messed up. I have not yet tried again but was curious
if there was a 'correct' method. Otherwise I was just going to have
the two be independent insofar as the config DB went. I require
this so either will be completely, and indefinitely, functional when
the other is down.
--
Daryle A. Tilroe
------------------------------
Message: 2
Date: Mon, 09 Jul 2007 10:29:19 -0600
From: Richard Megginson
Subject: Re: [Fedora-directory-users] Admin Server connecting to two
Directory Servers within the same domain
To: "General discussion list for the Fedora Directory server project."
Message-ID: <4692625F.2030205 at redhat.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Daryle A. Tilroe wrote:
> Joel Heenan wrote:
>
>> On Sat, 2007-07-07 at 00:14 +1000, Richard Megginson wrote:
>>
>>> How did you create your directory server instances? Usually the
>>> first one you create is your Configuration Directory Server, the one
>>> the console uses as sort of a network registry (the o=NetscapeRoot
>>> suffix). Subsequent directory server instance creation should use
>>> this one instead of creating a new Config DS. The setup program
>>> should give you these options.
>
> I have a closely related question. Is there a correct way in a simple
> dual multimaster setup to have the two servers both be config servers
> for the same DB? I tried just replicating NetscapeRoot but I ended up
> with things messed up.
How so?
> I have not yet tried again but was curious
> if there was a 'correct' method.
Not really. There are too many places where the host:port of the config
DS are hard coded, and there is not really a provision for specifying
more than one for failover.
> Otherwise I was just going to have
> the two be independent insofar as the config DB went. I require
> this so either will be completely, and indefinitely, functional when
> the other is down.
>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature
Size: 3245 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Url : https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-directory-users/attachments/20070709/c3cda3ee/smime.bin
------------------------------
Message: 3
Date: Mon, 09 Jul 2007 10:52:05 -0600
From: "Daryle A. Tilroe"
Subject: Re: [Fedora-directory-users] Admin Server connecting to two
Directory Servers within the same domain
To: "General discussion list for the Fedora Directory server project."
Message-ID: <469267B5.6090607 at micralyne.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Richard Megginson wrote:
> Daryle A. Tilroe wrote:
>
>> I have a closely related question. Is there a correct way in a simple
>> dual multimaster setup to have the two servers both be config servers
>> for the same DB? I tried just replicating NetscapeRoot but I ended up
>> with things messed up.
>
> How so?
It was a couple weeks ago but IIRC the admin server on the second
master would not run properly. I will really have to try it again
to confirm.
>> I have not yet tried again but was curious
>> if there was a 'correct' method.
>
> Not really. There are too many places where the host:port of the config
> DS are hard coded, and there is not really a provision for specifying
> more than one for failover.
So basically I should have my two multimasters run independent admin
servers? I did notice that I can admin the other "independent"
secondary master with the 'left over' entry in the config DB of
the primary (it was left there after I redid the secondary since
the I left the primary). This suggests I could probably add each
of the two master to each other's config DB manually. I'm not really
sure that this is even useful though in a small install. Probably
best to leave them as separate admin servers with the userRoot
replicated; that seems to work just fine.
--
Daryle A. Tilroe
------------------------------
Message: 4
Date: Mon, 09 Jul 2007 10:49:07 -0600
From: Richard Megginson
Subject: Re: [Fedora-directory-users] Admin Server connecting to two
Directory Servers within the same domain
To: "General discussion list for the Fedora Directory server project."
Message-ID: <46926703.1040305 at redhat.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Daryle A. Tilroe wrote:
> Richard Megginson wrote:
>
>> Daryle A. Tilroe wrote:
>>
>>> I have a closely related question. Is there a correct way in a simple
>>> dual multimaster setup to have the two servers both be config servers
>>> for the same DB? I tried just replicating NetscapeRoot but I ended up
>>> with things messed up.
>>
>> How so?
>
> It was a couple weeks ago but IIRC the admin server on the second
> master would not run properly. I will really have to try it again
> to confirm.
>
>>> I have not yet tried again but was curious
>>> if there was a 'correct' method.
>>
>> Not really. There are too many places where the host:port of the
>> config DS are hard coded, and there is not really a provision for
>> specifying more than one for failover.
>
> So basically I should have my two multimasters run independent admin
> servers? I did notice that I can admin the other "independent"
> secondary master with the 'left over' entry in the config DB of
> the primary (it was left there after I redid the secondary since
> the I left the primary). This suggests I could probably add each
> of the two master to each other's config DB manually.
Yes, you could do that too.
> I'm not really
> sure that this is even useful though in a small install. Probably
> best to leave them as separate admin servers with the userRoot
> replicated; that seems to work just fine.
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature
Size: 3245 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Url : https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-directory-users/attachments/20070709/a50e6030/smime.bin
------------------------------
Message: 5
Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2007 11:15:46 +0100 (BST)
From: surendhar surya
Subject: [Fedora-directory-users] Regarding fds with samba
To: fedora-directory-users at redhat.com
Message-ID: <89864.12273.qm at web8903.mail.in.yahoo.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
I have installed fedora directory server and i tried to integreate with samba.
When i tried to groupmap using this command. I get a error message. what will be the problem. can anyone provide me a solution.?
[root at fds ~]# net groupmap add rid=512 ntgroup="Domain Admins" unixgroup="Domain Admins"
Can't lookup UNIX group Domain Admins
Thanks and Regard
Surendhar P
Chennai
---------------------------------
Download prohibited? No problem. CHAT from any browser, without download.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-directory-users/attachments/20070710/4b014e42/attachment.html
------------------------------
Message: 6
Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2007 11:08:13 -0400
From: "Vampire D"
Subject: [Fedora-directory-users] No X
To: fedora-directory-users at redhat.com
Message-ID:
<4ca8a4870707100808o12705142me70ea9af5cbf7a13 at mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Is there anything you cannot do with FDS when using the HTTP Control
Panel rather than using the X Windows Java Control Panel?
Is it highly recommended to use the X Windows Java Control Panel in
production?
--
"Do the actors on Unsolved Mysteries ever get arrested because they look
just like the criminal they are playing?"
Christopher
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-directory-users/attachments/20070710/3bf15536/attachment.html
------------------------------
Message: 7
Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2007 11:22:30 -0400
From: Ivan Ferreira
Subject: Re: [Fedora-directory-users] Regarding fds with samba
To: "General discussion list for the Fedora Directory server project."
Cc: fedora-directory-users at redhat.com,
fedora-directory-users-bounces at redhat.com
Message-ID:
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
You have to creaete the "Domain Admins" Unix Group (PosixGroup) in the
Directory Server.
If you already created id, check if you can list the group with:
getent group
If you cannot see the "Domain Admins" unix group, then you have a problem
with your LDAP client conrfuration, check ldap.conf.
Para
fedora-directory-users at redhat.co
m
surendhar surya cc
.in> Asunto
Enviado por: [Fedora-directory-users]
fedora-directory-users-b Regarding fds with samba
ounces at redhat.com Clasificación
Uso Interno
10/07/2007 06:15 a.m.
Por favor, responda a
"General discussion list
for the Fedora Directory
server project."
redhat.com>
I have installed fedora directory server and i tried to integreate with
samba.
When i tried to groupmap using this command. I get a error message. what
will be the problem. can anyone provide me a solution.?
[root at fds ~]# net groupmap add rid=512 ntgroup="Domain Admins"
unixgroup="Domain Admins"
Can't lookup UNIX group Domain Admins
Thanks and Regard
Surendhar P
Chennai
Download prohibited? No problem. CHAT from any browser, without download.
--
Fedora-directory-users mailing list
Fedora-directory-users at redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-directory-users
========================================================================================
AVISO LEGAL: Esta información es privada y confidencial y está dirigida
únicamente a su destinatario. Si usted no es el destinatario original de
este mensaje y por este medio pudo acceder a dicha información por favor
elimine el mensaje. La distribución o copia de este mensaje está
estrictamente prohibida. Esta comunicación es sólo para propósitos de
información y no debe ser considerada como propuesta, aceptación ni como
una declaración de voluntad oficial de NUCLEO S.A. La transmisión de
e-mails no garantiza que el correo electrónico sea seguro o libre de error.
Por consiguiente, no manifestamos que esta información sea completa o
precisa. Toda información está sujeta a alterarse sin previo aviso.
This information is private and confidential and intended for the
recipient only. If you are not the intended recipient of this message you
are hereby notified that any review, dissemination, distribution or
copying of this message is strictly prohibited. This communication is for
information purposes only and shall not be regarded neither as a proposal,
acceptance nor as a statement of will or official statement from NUCLEO
S.A. . Email transmission cannot be guaranteed to be secure or error-free.
Therefore, we do not represent that this information is complete or
accurate and it should not be relied upon as such. All information is
subject to change without notice.
------------------------------
Message: 8
Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2007 09:27:12 -0600
From: Richard Megginson
Subject: Re: [Fedora-directory-users] No X
To: "General discussion list for the Fedora Directory server project."
Message-ID: <4693A550.4060309 at redhat.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Vampire D wrote:
> Is there anything you cannot do with FDS when using the HTTP Control
> Panel rather than using the X Windows Java Control Panel?
The HTTP control panel (aka phonebook/gateway or admin express) just
allows limited user/group management, server log viewing, and server
start/stop. The Java Control Panel (aka console) allows you do perform
all aspects of server, user, and group management.
>
> Is it highly recommended to use the X Windows Java Control Panel in
> production?
If you require a management GUI, then yes. All administration can be
performed via the command line and via LDAP.
>
> --
> "Do the actors on Unsolved Mysteries ever get arrested because they
> look just like the criminal they are playing?"
>
> Christopher
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> --
> Fedora-directory-users mailing list
> Fedora-directory-users at redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-directory-users
>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature
Size: 3245 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Url : https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-directory-users/attachments/20070710/2cbdf6dc/smime.bin
------------------------------
Message: 9
Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2007 10:44:29 -0500
From: Darren Fulton - CTI
Subject: [Fedora-directory-users] add new customer to Quickbooks from
Directory Server
To: Fedora-directory-users at redhat.com
Message-ID: <4693A95D.10409 at concepttechnologyinc.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Disclaimer: Shot in the dark and possibly off-topic.
Situation: We add client contacts to our Fedora Directory Server. The
billing department has to also manually add client contacts into
Quickbooks to generate bills and such.
Goal: Make it so the client contacts only have to be manually added
into only one system.
Proposed Solutions: Make Quickbooks look for clients in the directory
_or_ create a simple way to export from the directory client contact
info (I think Quickbooks uses an IIF file). [BTW, wouldn't it be cool
if there was a link in Directory Express web app to generate this like
the vCard link?]
Question for List:
Has anybody had any experience getting either of these done that they
would like to share?
Final Disclaimer: Google searches revealed one or more commercial
third-party applications that allow Quickbooks to "integrate" with
LDAP. A quick look at these programs didn't impress me, but I have
_not_ tested them. Google searches also revealed a Finance::IIF perl
module that I will keep in mind. Thank you for any input.
--
Best Regards,
Darren Fulton
Concept Technology, Inc.
1106 17th Avenue South
Nashville, TN 37212
Phone - 615.321.6428 Ext. 105
Fax - 615.321.5598
------------------------------
--
Fedora-directory-users mailing list
Fedora-directory-users at redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-directory-users
End of Fedora-directory-users Digest, Vol 26, Issue 9
*****************************************************
Thanks and Regard
Surendhar P
Chennai
---------------------------------
5, 50, 500, 5000. Store N number of mails in your inbox. Click here.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/389-users/attachments/20070711/9e10f53a/attachment.html>
More information about the 389-users
mailing list