[Fedora-directory-users] FDS 1.1 Transport endpoint is not connected
Rich Megginson
rmeggins at redhat.com
Fri Feb 15 20:53:04 UTC 2008
Richard Hesse wrote:
> Thanks Richard, I¹ll give connection management a whirl.
>
What is the application which is generating this load?
> Here¹s the log parser output (nice util btw):
>
> ----------- Access Log Output ------------
>
> Restarts: 0
>
> Total Connections: 4820
> Peak Concurrent Connections: 19
> Total Operations: 18017
> Total Results: 18129
> Overall Performance: 100.0%
>
> Searches: 9960
> Modifications: 6
> Adds: 0
> Deletes: 0
> Mod RDNs: 0
>
> Persistent Searches: 0
> Internal Operations: 0
> Entry Operations: 0
> Extended Operations: 3224
> Abandoned Requests: 0
> Smart Referrals Received: 0
>
> VLV Operations: 0
> VLV Unindexed Searches: 0
> SORT Operations: 0
> SSL Connections: 1613
>
> Entire Search Base Queries: 820
> Unindexed Searches: 0
>
> FDs Taken: 4828
> FDs Returned: 4817
> Highest FD Taken: 109
>
> Broken Pipes: 0
> Connections Reset By Peer: 0
> Resource Unavailable: 17
> - 17 (T1) Idle Timeout Exceeded
>
> Binds: 4827
> Unbinds: 65
>
> LDAP v2 Binds: 0
> LDAP v3 Binds: 4827
> SSL Client Binds: 0
> Failed SSL Client Binds: 0
> SASL Binds: 0
>
> Directory Manager Binds: 0
> Anonymous Binds: 4813
> Other Binds: 14
>
>
>
> On 2/15/08 12:23 PM, "Rich Megginson" <rmeggins at redhat.com> wrote:
>
>
>> Richard Hesse wrote:
>>
>>> Eh sorry about this but it appears that my original hunch was correct.
>>> The 1.1 DS instance did indeed hang again recently. I was able to
>>> check a localhost query and that failed, too. So the problem
>>> definitely appears to be a hang in the FDS code somewhere. The
>>> question is, how do I go about debugging this? Strace doesn¹t show
>>> much at all. Enabling debug trace logging kills the server. Any ideas?
>>> Thanks.
>>>
>> What sort of application(s) are you using to generate a load against the
>> directory server?
>>
>> What does logconv.pl /var/log/dirsrv/slapd-instance/access say?
>>
>> If TRACE level logging is too expensive, you might try 8 Connection
>> management
>> http://directory.fedoraproject.org/wiki/FAQ#Troubleshooting
>>
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Fedora-directory-users mailing list
> Fedora-directory-users at redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-directory-users
>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature
Size: 3245 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
URL: <http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/389-users/attachments/20080215/3bbde829/attachment.bin>
More information about the 389-users
mailing list