[Fedora-directory-users] Why there is no rpm for 1.1.1?

[Rich Megginson]

DANIEL CRISTIAN CRUZ wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> I asked a week ago about the missing packages. Why there is no package 
> there yet?
>
> I got a server dying at random, and said to my sponsors that a project 
> from Redhat would be stable and we could get updates when needed. If 
> there is no plan to build these packages, why there is no warning on 
> the first page? Using a package with a serious bug in which any search 
> could stop your server is insane.
>
> There is no maintainer for the repository?
>
Yes.  The problem with FC6 RPMs is that they have to be manually built, 
signed, and distributed, since Koji/Bodhi do not support FC6.  The 
Fedora guys had been doing me a favor and signing them with the Fedora 
GPG key, but they don't want to do this anymore, and I don't blame 
them.  So I have signed these with my personal GPG key:
http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?search=rmeggins&op=index
Type bits /keyID            Date           User ID
pub  1024D/A7B02652 2008/07/01 Rich Megginson <rmeggins at redhat.com>

The RPMs are now available.  You will have to import my GPG public key 
into your rpm key store in order to be able to use yum to install these 
new RPMs.
>
> Regards,
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> *Daniel Cristian Cruz*
> *Administrador de Banco de Dados
> *Direção Regional - *Núcleo de Tecnologia da Informação
> SENAI - SC
> Telefone: 48-3239-1422 (ramal 1422)*
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> --
> Fedora-directory-users mailing list
> Fedora-directory-users at redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-directory-users
>   


-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature
Size: 3258 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
URL: <http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/389-users/attachments/20080701/781e6a78/attachment.bin>