[Fedora-directory-users] Is the userRoot database special?

[Ben Cohen]

Is the userRoot database treated specially in any way by fedora  
directory server?
I setup a directory server and made it a supplier of its userRoot  
database.  I installed a second server and set its default suffix to  
the same as the first server's when I created the directory instance  
(so the db named 'userRoot' created on the second server had the same  
root suffix as the db on the first server).  I then replicated the  
first server's userRoot database to the second server (first server is  
supplier, second is consumer).
My intention is that the second server will carry a read-only replica  
of the first server's database but the worry was raised that the  
userRoot database might be treated specially by some portion of the  
directory server and not like being a read only replica ...?
Should this be a concern?  Any clarity is appreciated.
Thanks much.

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/389-users/attachments/20080304/acd67290/attachment.html>