[Fedora-directory-users] FDS instance over UDP port (389)
Fernando Muñoz
fmunoz at hispafuentes.com
Wed May 28 18:12:45 UTC 2008
Thanks for yours answers,
I see PADL XAD, and I've a question about it:
Do you know XAD run with a FDS LDAP backend?
Thanks,
El sáb, 24-05-2008 a las 19:51 -0700, Howard Chu escribió:
> > Date: Fri, 23 May 2008 10:42:25 -0600
> > From: Rich Megginson<rmeggins at redhat.com>
>
> > Fernando Muñoz wrote:
> >> Hello,
> >>
> >>
> >> I've got a question,
> >>
> >> Is there any way for raise a LDAP instance over 389 UDP port (CLDAP)?
>
> OpenLDAP supports CLDAP. Note that there is no formal spec for this protocol;
> there was a draft for LDAPv2 that expired long ago. Microsoft's version of
> CLDAP (naturally) does not conform to that draft. OpenLDAP supports both the
> expired draft and the Microsoft bastardization thereof, and has done so since
> at least 2000.
>
> But offering LDAP over UDP is a far cry from joining an AD environment. (See
> PADL's XAD, for instance, which was developed on OpenLDAP and subsequently
> sold to Novell.)
>
> >> I've been trying to join a WindowsXP machine to a
> >> FDS(backend)-SAMBA3(PDC) environment, and I've got a problem:
> >>
> >> Sniffing a WindowsXP (client) machine traffic, I see there are LDAP
> >> petitions (connections) through UDP 389 port, and FDS instance run over
> >> TCP ports.
> >>
> > No, Fedora DS does not support UDP (CLDAP).
> >
> > You should check out Samba4.
>
> Yes, that would probably be the best route now.
>
More information about the 389-users
mailing list