[Fedora-directory-users] Warning with vlvindex....
Rich Megginson
rmeggins at redhat.com
Thu Sep 18 18:07:58 UTC 2008
Reinhard Nappert wrote:
> Rich, I have just the suffix entry in the directory at this point. I
> load this ldif script during setup:
> This seems to be fine:
> [18/Sep/2008:13:02:53 -0400] - import userRoot: Workers finished;
> cleaning up...
> [18/Sep/2008:13:02:53 -0400] - import userRoot: Workers cleaned up.
> [18/Sep/2008:13:02:53 -0400] - import userRoot: Cleaning up producer
> thread...
> [18/Sep/2008:13:02:53 -0400] - import userRoot: Indexing complete.
> Post-process
> ing...
> [18/Sep/2008:13:02:53 -0400] - Nothing to do to build ancestorid index
> [18/Sep/2008:13:02:53 -0400] - import userRoot: Flushing caches...
> [18/Sep/2008:13:02:53 -0400] - import userRoot: Closing files...
> [18/Sep/2008:13:02:53 -0400] - All database threads now stopped
> [18/Sep/2008:13:02:53 -0400] - import userRoot: Import complete.
> Processed 1 en
> tries in 0 seconds. (inf entries/sec)
>
> Afterwards, I do my vlvindex on the timestamps. I guess that the import
> does not set createTimestamp and this is why I get the warning.
>
> What do you think?
>
Sounds like at least two bugs
1) createTimestamp should be present, unless you have nsslapd-lastmod
turned off.
2) vlvindex should not give an error message - either its a real error
(not sure why) or the error message is spurious and should not be
printed by default
> -Reinhard
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: fedora-directory-users-bounces at redhat.com
> [mailto:fedora-directory-users-bounces at redhat.com] On Behalf Of Rich
> Megginson
> Sent: Thursday, September 18, 2008 1:32 PM
> To: General discussion list for the Fedora Directory server project.
> Subject: Re: [Fedora-directory-users] Warning with vlvindex....
>
> Reinhard Nappert wrote:
>
>> Rich,
>>
>> It seems to work. I will load a couple of thousands entries and do
>> some tests....
>>
>>
> Was the database empty when you ran vlvindex? If not, what was in it?
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: fedora-directory-users-bounces at redhat.com
>> [mailto:fedora-directory-users-bounces at redhat.com] On Behalf Of Rich
>> Megginson
>> Sent: Thursday, September 18, 2008 12:46 PM
>> To: General discussion list for the Fedora Directory server project.
>> Subject: Re: [Fedora-directory-users] Warning with vlvindex....
>>
>> Reinhard Nappert wrote:
>>
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I built FDS 1.1.2 from scratch and installed and configured it. I get
>>>
>
>
>>> the following warning, when I run a vlvindex. This used to run in any
>>>
>
>
>>> 1.0.x and 1.1.0 release.
>>>
>>> [18/Sep/2008:12:20:18 -0400] - warning: ancestorid not indexed on 1
>>> [18/Sep/2008:12:20:18 -0400] - userRoot: WARNING: Failed to fetch
>>> subtree lists: (-30990) DB_NOTFOUND: No matching key/data pair found
>>>
>>> [18/Sep/2008:12:20:18 -0400] - userRoot: Possibly the entrydn or
>>> ancestorid index is corrupted or does not exist.
>>> [18/Sep/2008:12:20:18 -0400] - userRoot: Attempting brute-force
>>> method
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>> instead.
>>> [18/Sep/2008:12:20:18 -0400] - userRoot: Finished indexing.
>>>
>>> Dows anybody has an idea?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>> Was the database empty when you started? It looks as though it
>> completed - does the vlv index work?
>>
>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> -Reinhard
>>>
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> -
>>> --
>>>
>>> --
>>> Fedora-directory-users mailing list
>>> Fedora-directory-users at redhat.com
>>> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-directory-users
>>>
>>>
>>>
>> --
>> Fedora-directory-users mailing list
>> Fedora-directory-users at redhat.com
>> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-directory-users
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Fedora-directory-users mailing list
> Fedora-directory-users at redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-directory-users
>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature
Size: 3258 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
URL: <http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/389-users/attachments/20080918/8b94a3ea/attachment.bin>
More information about the 389-users
mailing list