[Fedora-directory-users] High CPU load on FDS

[Rich Megginson]

Emmanuel BILLOT wrote:
> Rich Megginson a écrit :
>> Emmanuel BILLOT wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> Does anyones know how can we explain a 90% CPU utilization on FDS ?
>>> Many forum on the web speak about index problem or memory variables 
>>> misconfiguration (|nsslapd-idlistscanlimit and co).|
>>> ||
>>> |Howerver, i do not found any good web ites which explains howto |
>>> |- monitor indexes utilization|
>>> |- build/rebuilt indexes (if this is the problem)|
>>> |- configure properly FDS for having good performance|
>>> ||
>>> |Our directory tree contains 15000 entries.|
>>> ||
>>> |Does anyone know what can we do ? Best pratices ?|
>> What version of FDS?  What platform?  What sort of hardware?
>>
>> The logconv.pl tool is a good place to start to diagnose indexing 
>> issues.
>>> |How to know if there is a problem on our config ?|
>>> ||
>>> |Regards,|
>>> ||||
>>>
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> -- 
>> Fedora-directory-users mailing list
>> Fedora-directory-users at redhat.com
>> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-directory-users
>>   
> Sorry i've the logconv utility, which says
> Unindexed Searches:           0
>
> So i dan't explain why the CPU is so high.
>
> FDS 1.1.3 on Centos 5.1, VMWare
>
logconv.pl has more output - you might try looking at the operation 
times, then refer back to the access log to see what operations are 
taking a long time

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature
Size: 3258 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
URL: <http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/389-users/attachments/20090121/48c4e0e6/attachment.bin>