[389-users] Registering to a central admin server
Rich Megginson
rmeggins at redhat.com
Mon Jun 22 19:18:35 UTC 2009
Chris Phillips wrote:
>
> On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 8:04 PM, Rich Megginson <rmeggins at redhat.com
> <mailto:rmeggins at redhat.com>> wrote:
>
> Chris Phillips wrote:
>
>
> Try editing /etc/dirsrv/admin-serv/adm.conf to point to the
> correct server, then try register-ds-admin.pl
>
>
> I'm afraid I'm still in the dark here. The adm.conf is used by
> the admin server to contact the DS instance to be managed? I
> thought the logic was the other way round, with the DS server
> "phoning home" to register itself to the Admin. Either way,
> the adm.conf then only lists one server in the ldapurl, and
> the other two attributes referencing the server, sie and isie
> both get changed to match the server in the ldapurl as part of
> the registration, removing all other references to the server
> that was in there. So whilst I thought my modifications to
> adm.conf (changing the ldapurl from server b to a) on server b
> and running register-ds-admin.pl on server b would add server
> b to the admin console on server a. Instead it *replaced*
> server b with server a on the admin console on server b,
> meaning both admin consoles were then registered to administer
> server a. Not anything like what I wanted!
>
> Any pointers?
>
> Change adm.conf back to point to which server you want to use as
> your main server, and then run setup-ds-admin.pl -u
>
>
> My main what server? DS or Admin?
DS. The directory server which has the master copy of o=NetscapeRoot
which contains all of the configuration information for all of the admin
servers and directory servers in your organization.
> As I understand that, that will register whatever server is listed as
> the ldapurl as the only instance in the Admin server on the box I'm
> running this on. Correct?
No.
>
> Am I being deluded about this? I'm expect to log in to an admin server
> with the idm console, and see a list of 8 different machines listed
> there, and be able to browse the ldap tree of any of those machines,
Yes.
> including their o=NetscapeRoot
No. Only the master configuration DS will have o=NetscapeRoot. The
other servers should not have o=NetscapeRoot (unless you have set up
MMR/failover for o=NetscapeRoot).
> and be able to manage ACI's, password policies and such... This is the
> model you recommend, no?
This is the recommended model.
>
> Thanks
>
> Chris
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> --
> 389 users mailing list
> 389-users at redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-directory-users
>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature
Size: 3258 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
URL: <http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/389-users/attachments/20090622/221420a5/attachment.bin>
More information about the 389-users
mailing list