[389-users] libpam-passthru-plugin

[Rich Megginson]

Tim Hartmann wrote:
> Rich Megginson wrote:
>> Tim Hartmann wrote:
>>  
>>> Hi Folks,
>>>
>>> I've been looking at upgrading the version of libpam-passthru-plugin.so
>>> that we use, we are using v 1.1.3 from an older version of Fedora
>>> Directory Server on our RHDS 8.0 Install, I noticed that v 1.2.2 is
>>> available in 389 on Fedora 11, and thought it might be useful to 
>>> upgrade
>>> my version of the Plugin.  Are there any Pros/Con's to using a newer
>>> version of the plug in?
>>>       
>> You want to use the pam passthrough plugin from 389 1.2.2 Fedora 11 
>> with 1.1.3?  There are binaries for EL5.
>>   
> Could you point me in the right direction to get the binaries?  I 
> asked for guidance through our support channel and they claimed they 
> didn't support the pam-passthru-plugin.
pam passthrough plugin is not supported for Red Hat Directory Server.  
It is supported for 389 Directory Server.  You can use the 389 EL5 
binary pam passthrough plugin with Red Hat Directory Server on EL5, but 
you may run afoul of Red Hat support if you do that.
> I've been having sporatic problems with the dirsrv daemon dieing and 
> they thought it may be in relation to the pam-passthru-plugin
>
> Thanks for the help Rich!
>
> Tim
>
> -- 
> 389 users mailing list
> 389-users at redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-directory-users

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature
Size: 3258 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
URL: <http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/389-users/attachments/20091125/58350ad8/attachment.bin>