[389-users] Directory Re-population
Rich Megginson
rmeggins at redhat.com
Wed Jun 23 22:34:44 UTC 2010
Chun Tat David Chu wrote:
> Hi Rich,
>
> Thanks for helping. I followed your direction and exported another
> LDIF for my 2nd database but whenever I try to load it I get an error
> message "ldap_add: Operations error".
What's in the errors log?
>
> Here's a little information on my DIT hierarchy.
> Database 1: dc=foo,dc=com
> Database 2: dc=new_foo,dc=foo,dc=com
>
> I ran the ldif2db.pl <http://ldif2db.pl> using the verbose switch and
> here's the output.
> ldapmodify: started Wed Jun 23 17:11:34 2010
>
> ldap_init( <hostname>, 389 )
> add objectclass:
> top
> extensibleObject
> add cn:
> import_2010_6_23_17_11_34
> add nsInstance:
> userRoot
> add nsFilename:
> /home/chud/OLAY/LDAP_REPOPULATION_TEST/second_dit.ldif
> add nsImportChunkSize:
> 0
> add nsUniqueIdGenerator:
> time
> adding new entry cn=import_2010_6_23_17_11_34, cn=import, cn=tasks,
> cn=config
> ldap_add: Operations error
>
> At this point, I am stuck. Do you have any idea what went wrong? The
> reload of the root database does work but when I reload the 2nd
> database that sits underneath in the root database in the DIT it
> doesn't work.
>
> Thanks in advance!
>
> - David
>
> On Tue, Jun 22, 2010 at 6:58 PM, Rich Megginson <rmeggins at redhat.com
> <mailto:rmeggins at redhat.com>> wrote:
>
> Chun Tat David Chu wrote:
> > Thanks Rich,
> >
> > I did more experiment, and I noticed one of my database didn't get
> > reload after I ran ldif2db.pl <http://ldif2db.pl>
> <http://ldif2db.pl> script
> >
> > My DIT has a root database and then a sub database under the root
> > database. When I did the export, I exported from the root database.
> > When I ran the ldif2db.pl <http://ldif2db.pl>
> <http://ldif2db.pl> script, only the root
> > database get reloaded but not the sub database.
> >
> > Do you have any ideas?
> Yes. You need an LDIF for each database.
> >
> > Thanks in advance
> >
> > - David
> >
> > On Tue, Jun 22, 2010 at 5:30 PM, Rich Megginson
> <rmeggins at redhat.com <mailto:rmeggins at redhat.com>
> > <mailto:rmeggins at redhat.com <mailto:rmeggins at redhat.com>>> wrote:
> >
> > Chun Tat David Chu wrote:
> > > Hi Rich,
> > >
> > > I did some testing and it appears to be working as you
> expected.
> > > The steps involve
> > > 1) Export the directory database to a LDIF
> > > 2) Reload the directory database
> > > 3) Reinitialize the consumer
> > >
> > > I have another question. I noticed there's an ACI on the
> directory
> > > database LDIF.
> > > aci: (targetattr = "*")(version 3.0; acl "SIE Group";
> allow (all)
> > > groupdn = "l
> > > dap:///cn=slapd-foo, cn=Red Hat Directory Server, cn=Server
> > Group, cn=
> > > foo.com <http://foo.com> <http://foo.com>
> <http://foo.com>, ou=tscei.dd-x.com <http://tscei.dd-x.com>
> > <http://tscei.dd-x.com> <http://tscei.dd-x.com>,
> > > o=NetscapeRoot";)
> > >
> > > Do I need to modify the hostname in that ACI if I want to
> load the
> > > same directory database into another LDAP? Essentially I want
> > to use
> > > a basic directory database LDIF and load it to a bunch of
> different
> > > development LDAP we have. Some LDAPs are multi-mastered
> configured
> > > and most are not.
> > No, you do not need to change that hostname.
> > >
> > > Thanks in advance
> > >
> > > - David
> > >
> > > On Tue, Jun 22, 2010 at 2:43 PM, Rich Megginson
> > <rmeggins at redhat.com <mailto:rmeggins at redhat.com>
> <mailto:rmeggins at redhat.com <mailto:rmeggins at redhat.com>>
> > > <mailto:rmeggins at redhat.com <mailto:rmeggins at redhat.com>
> <mailto:rmeggins at redhat.com <mailto:rmeggins at redhat.com>>>> wrote:
> > >
> > > Chun Tat David Chu wrote:
> > > > Another question about directory re-population.
> > > >
> > > > If I want to create a generic LDIF backup for a
> bunch of test
> > > > directory servers, in the exported LDIF file, should I
> > remove the
> > > > following attributes? or it doesn't really matter?
> > > > nsUniqueId: 795dca00-5fa011df-8de2866b-a65dc74a
> > > > creatorsName:
> > > > modifiersName: cn=directory manager
> > > > createTimestamp: 20100514213428Z
> > > > modifyTimestamp: 20100514213430Z
> > > I don't think it matters. I suppose you might want to
> keep
> > > createTimestamp and modifyTimestamp just for your own
> > information.
> > > >
> > > > My LDIF backup will be imported back to the LDAP using
> > > ldif2db.pl <http://ldif2db.pl> <http://ldif2db.pl>
> <http://ldif2db.pl>
> > > > <http://ldif2db.pl>.
> > > >
> > > > - David
> > > >
> > > > On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 4:40 PM, Chun Tat David Chu
> > > > <beyonddc.storage at gmail.com
> <mailto:beyonddc.storage at gmail.com>
> > <mailto:beyonddc.storage at gmail.com
> <mailto:beyonddc.storage at gmail.com>>
> > <mailto:beyonddc.storage at gmail.com
> <mailto:beyonddc.storage at gmail.com>
> > <mailto:beyonddc.storage at gmail.com
> <mailto:beyonddc.storage at gmail.com>>>
> > > <mailto:beyonddc.storage at gmail.com
> <mailto:beyonddc.storage at gmail.com>
> > <mailto:beyonddc.storage at gmail.com
> <mailto:beyonddc.storage at gmail.com>>
> > > <mailto:beyonddc.storage at gmail.com
> <mailto:beyonddc.storage at gmail.com>
> > <mailto:beyonddc.storage at gmail.com
> <mailto:beyonddc.storage at gmail.com>>>>> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Thanks Rich, I'll give that a try.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 4:20 PM, Rich Megginson
> > > > <rmeggins at redhat.com
> <mailto:rmeggins at redhat.com> <mailto:rmeggins at redhat.com
> <mailto:rmeggins at redhat.com>>
> > <mailto:rmeggins at redhat.com <mailto:rmeggins at redhat.com>
> <mailto:rmeggins at redhat.com <mailto:rmeggins at redhat.com>>>
> > > <mailto:rmeggins at redhat.com
> <mailto:rmeggins at redhat.com> <mailto:rmeggins at redhat.com
> <mailto:rmeggins at redhat.com>>
> > <mailto:rmeggins at redhat.com <mailto:rmeggins at redhat.com>
> <mailto:rmeggins at redhat.com <mailto:rmeggins at redhat.com>>>>> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Chun Tat David Chu wrote:
> > > > > Hi Rich,
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks for replying.
> > > > >
> > > > > Just making sure I'm using the right
> utility. To
> > > > reinitialize the
> > > > > directory, I use the ldif2db.pl
> <http://ldif2db.pl>
> > <http://ldif2db.pl> <http://ldif2db.pl>
> > > <http://ldif2db.pl>
> > > > <http://ldif2db.pl> Perl script right?
> > > > Yes, if you need to restore _all_ servers
> from an LDIF
> > > backup.
> > > > The
> > > > reason I say _all_ is that when you do a restore
> > from a
> > > "raw"
> > > > LDIF file,
> > > > this wipes out all of the replication state
> > information and
> > > > changelog
> > > > information. This means you will have to
> use this
> > server to
> > > > re-init
> > > > other masters and consumers - (I mean
> re-init in the
> > > sense of
> > > > Initializing Consumers -
> > > >
> > >
> >
> http://www.redhat.com/docs/manuals/dir-server/8.1/admin/Managing_Replication-Initializing_Consumers.html)
> > > >
> > > > You can use db2ldif.pl <http://db2ldif.pl>
> <http://db2ldif.pl>
> > <http://db2ldif.pl>
> > > <http://db2ldif.pl> -r to create an
> > > > LDIF file suitable for offline
> > > > replica init
> > > > >
> > > > > - David
> > > > >
> > > > > On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 3:58 PM, Rich
> Megginson
> > > > <rmeggins at redhat.com
> <mailto:rmeggins at redhat.com> <mailto:rmeggins at redhat.com
> <mailto:rmeggins at redhat.com>>
> > <mailto:rmeggins at redhat.com <mailto:rmeggins at redhat.com>
> <mailto:rmeggins at redhat.com <mailto:rmeggins at redhat.com>>>
> > > <mailto:rmeggins at redhat.com
> <mailto:rmeggins at redhat.com> <mailto:rmeggins at redhat.com
> <mailto:rmeggins at redhat.com>>
> > <mailto:rmeggins at redhat.com <mailto:rmeggins at redhat.com>
> <mailto:rmeggins at redhat.com <mailto:rmeggins at redhat.com>>>>
> > > > > <mailto:rmeggins at redhat.com
> <mailto:rmeggins at redhat.com>
> > <mailto:rmeggins at redhat.com <mailto:rmeggins at redhat.com>>
> > > <mailto:rmeggins at redhat.com
> <mailto:rmeggins at redhat.com> <mailto:rmeggins at redhat.com
> <mailto:rmeggins at redhat.com>>>
> > <mailto:rmeggins at redhat.com <mailto:rmeggins at redhat.com>
> <mailto:rmeggins at redhat.com <mailto:rmeggins at redhat.com>>
> > > <mailto:rmeggins at redhat.com
> <mailto:rmeggins at redhat.com> <mailto:rmeggins at redhat.com
> <mailto:rmeggins at redhat.com>>>>>>
> > > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > Chun Tat David Chu wrote:
> > > > > > Hi all,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I am hitting an issue with
> reinitializing the
> > > > directory database.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Basically I have two directory
> servers and
> > they're
> > > > configured using
> > > > > > multi-master replication scheme.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > When I reinitialize the directory
> > database, the
> > > > directory became
> > > > > > inaccessible. I think it is related
> with my
> > > multi-master
> > > > > replication
> > > > > > setup because when I use only
> reinitialize
> > one LDAP,
> > > > it would work
> > > > > > just fine
> > > > > >
> > > > > > My question is if multi-master
> replication is
> > > enabled
> > > > on two LDAPs
> > > > > > then do I need to reinitialize both
> LDAPs
> > at the
> > > same
> > > > time or
> > > > > just one
> > > > > > LDAP?
> > > > > If you use one master (m1) to re-init the
> > other master
> > > > (m2), you
> > > > > do not
> > > > > need to then use m2 to re-init m2.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Thanks!
> > > > > >
> > > > > > - David
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Fri, May 14, 2010 at 4:42 PM,
> Chun Tat
> > David Chu
> > > > > > <beyonddc.storage at gmail.com
> <mailto:beyonddc.storage at gmail.com>
> > <mailto:beyonddc.storage at gmail.com
> <mailto:beyonddc.storage at gmail.com>>
> > > <mailto:beyonddc.storage at gmail.com
> <mailto:beyonddc.storage at gmail.com>
> > <mailto:beyonddc.storage at gmail.com
> <mailto:beyonddc.storage at gmail.com>>>
> > > > <mailto:beyonddc.storage at gmail.com
> <mailto:beyonddc.storage at gmail.com>
> > <mailto:beyonddc.storage at gmail.com
> <mailto:beyonddc.storage at gmail.com>>
> > > <mailto:beyonddc.storage at gmail.com
> <mailto:beyonddc.storage at gmail.com>
> > <mailto:beyonddc.storage at gmail.com
> <mailto:beyonddc.storage at gmail.com>>>>
> > > > <mailto:beyonddc.storage at gmail.com
> <mailto:beyonddc.storage at gmail.com>
> > <mailto:beyonddc.storage at gmail.com
> <mailto:beyonddc.storage at gmail.com>>
> > > <mailto:beyonddc.storage at gmail.com
> <mailto:beyonddc.storage at gmail.com>
> > <mailto:beyonddc.storage at gmail.com
> <mailto:beyonddc.storage at gmail.com>>>
> > > > <mailto:beyonddc.storage at gmail.com
> <mailto:beyonddc.storage at gmail.com>
> > <mailto:beyonddc.storage at gmail.com
> <mailto:beyonddc.storage at gmail.com>>
> > > <mailto:beyonddc.storage at gmail.com
> <mailto:beyonddc.storage at gmail.com>
> > <mailto:beyonddc.storage at gmail.com
> <mailto:beyonddc.storage at gmail.com>>>>>
> > > > > <mailto:beyonddc.storage at gmail.com
> <mailto:beyonddc.storage at gmail.com>
> > <mailto:beyonddc.storage at gmail.com
> <mailto:beyonddc.storage at gmail.com>>
> > > <mailto:beyonddc.storage at gmail.com
> <mailto:beyonddc.storage at gmail.com>
> > <mailto:beyonddc.storage at gmail.com
> <mailto:beyonddc.storage at gmail.com>>>
> > > > <mailto:beyonddc.storage at gmail.com
> <mailto:beyonddc.storage at gmail.com>
> > <mailto:beyonddc.storage at gmail.com
> <mailto:beyonddc.storage at gmail.com>>
> > > <mailto:beyonddc.storage at gmail.com
> <mailto:beyonddc.storage at gmail.com>
> > <mailto:beyonddc.storage at gmail.com
> <mailto:beyonddc.storage at gmail.com>>>>
> > > > > <mailto:beyonddc.storage at gmail.com
> <mailto:beyonddc.storage at gmail.com>
> > <mailto:beyonddc.storage at gmail.com
> <mailto:beyonddc.storage at gmail.com>>
> > > <mailto:beyonddc.storage at gmail.com
> <mailto:beyonddc.storage at gmail.com>
> > <mailto:beyonddc.storage at gmail.com
> <mailto:beyonddc.storage at gmail.com>>>
> > > > <mailto:beyonddc.storage at gmail.com
> <mailto:beyonddc.storage at gmail.com>
> > <mailto:beyonddc.storage at gmail.com
> <mailto:beyonddc.storage at gmail.com>>
> > > <mailto:beyonddc.storage at gmail.com
> <mailto:beyonddc.storage at gmail.com>
> > <mailto:beyonddc.storage at gmail.com
> <mailto:beyonddc.storage at gmail.com>>>>>>> wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Reinitializing the directory
> database
> > does the
> > > > trick! I'm going
> > > > > > to do more testing on it.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Thanks a lot!
> > > > > >
> > > > > > - David
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Fri, May 14, 2010 at 1:43 PM,
> David
> > Boreham
> > > > > > <david_list at boreham.org
> <mailto:david_list at boreham.org>
> > <mailto:david_list at boreham.org <mailto:david_list at boreham.org>>
> > > <mailto:david_list at boreham.org
> <mailto:david_list at boreham.org> <mailto:david_list at boreham.org
> <mailto:david_list at boreham.org>>>
> > > > <mailto:david_list at boreham.org
> <mailto:david_list at boreham.org>
> > <mailto:david_list at boreham.org <mailto:david_list at boreham.org>>
> > > <mailto:david_list at boreham.org
> <mailto:david_list at boreham.org>
> > <mailto:david_list at boreham.org
> <mailto:david_list at boreham.org>>>> <mailto:david_list at boreham.org
> <mailto:david_list at boreham.org>
> > <mailto:david_list at boreham.org <mailto:david_list at boreham.org>>
> > > <mailto:david_list at boreham.org
> <mailto:david_list at boreham.org> <mailto:david_list at boreham.org
> <mailto:david_list at boreham.org>>>
> > > > <mailto:david_list at boreham.org
> <mailto:david_list at boreham.org>
> > <mailto:david_list at boreham.org <mailto:david_list at boreham.org>>
> > > <mailto:david_list at boreham.org
> <mailto:david_list at boreham.org>
> > <mailto:david_list at boreham.org
> <mailto:david_list at boreham.org>>>>>
> > > > > <mailto:david_list at boreham.org
> <mailto:david_list at boreham.org>
> > <mailto:david_list at boreham.org <mailto:david_list at boreham.org>>
> > > <mailto:david_list at boreham.org
> <mailto:david_list at boreham.org> <mailto:david_list at boreham.org
> <mailto:david_list at boreham.org>>>
> > > > <mailto:david_list at boreham.org
> <mailto:david_list at boreham.org>
> > <mailto:david_list at boreham.org <mailto:david_list at boreham.org>>
> > > <mailto:david_list at boreham.org
> <mailto:david_list at boreham.org>
> > <mailto:david_list at boreham.org
> <mailto:david_list at boreham.org>>>> <mailto:david_list at boreham.org
> <mailto:david_list at boreham.org>
> > <mailto:david_list at boreham.org <mailto:david_list at boreham.org>>
> > > <mailto:david_list at boreham.org
> <mailto:david_list at boreham.org> <mailto:david_list at boreham.org
> <mailto:david_list at boreham.org>>>
> > > > <mailto:david_list at boreham.org
> <mailto:david_list at boreham.org>
> > <mailto:david_list at boreham.org <mailto:david_list at boreham.org>>
> > > <mailto:david_list at boreham.org
> <mailto:david_list at boreham.org>
> > <mailto:david_list at boreham.org
> <mailto:david_list at boreham.org>>>>>>>
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On 5/14/2010 11:40 AM, Chun
> Tat David
> > > Chu wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > We use 389 Directory as
> part of our
> > > > development lab.
> > > > > Every
> > > > > > time when
> > > > > > > we do a new test, we need to
> > > repopulate our 389
> > > > > directory to
> > > > > > a clean
> > > > > > > slate (i.e. delete all
> existing
> > data and
> > > > re-create a base
> > > > > > hierarchy
> > > > > > > tree).
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Our current way of doing so is
> > simply
> > > using
> > > > the ldapdelete
> > > > > > command to
> > > > > > > remove all existing data
> and use
> > > ldapadd to
> > > > re-create
> > > > > the base
> > > > > > > hierarchy tree. This approach
> > is okay but
> > > > sometime it
> > > > > could
> > > > > > take up
> > > > > > > to 20 to 30 minutes to
> delete all
> > > existing data
> > > > > depending on the
> > > > > > > amount of data saved in the
> > directory.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Is there a more efficient
> way to
> > > repopulate
> > > > the 389
> > > > > Directory?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Yes. Import an almost empty
> LDIF file.
> > > You can
> > > > also copy the
> > > > > > on-disk
> > > > > > database underneath a server
> (when
> > it is
> > > shut
> > > > down), if you
> > > > > > know what
> > > > > > you're doing.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > --
> > > > > > 389 users mailing list
> > > > > >
> 389-users at lists.fedoraproject.org
> <mailto:389-users at lists.fedoraproject.org>
> > <mailto:389-users at lists.fedoraproject.org
> <mailto:389-users at lists.fedoraproject.org>>
> > > <mailto:389-users at lists.fedoraproject.org
> <mailto:389-users at lists.fedoraproject.org>
> > <mailto:389-users at lists.fedoraproject.org
> <mailto:389-users at lists.fedoraproject.org>>>
> > > > <mailto:389-users at lists.fedoraproject.org
> <mailto:389-users at lists.fedoraproject.org>
> > <mailto:389-users at lists.fedoraproject.org
> <mailto:389-users at lists.fedoraproject.org>>
> > > <mailto:389-users at lists.fedoraproject.org
> <mailto:389-users at lists.fedoraproject.org>
> > <mailto:389-users at lists.fedoraproject.org
> <mailto:389-users at lists.fedoraproject.org>>>>
> > > > >
> <mailto:389-users at lists.fedoraproject.org
> <mailto:389-users at lists.fedoraproject.org>
> > <mailto:389-users at lists.fedoraproject.org
> <mailto:389-users at lists.fedoraproject.org>>
> > > <mailto:389-users at lists.fedoraproject.org
> <mailto:389-users at lists.fedoraproject.org>
> > <mailto:389-users at lists.fedoraproject.org
> <mailto:389-users at lists.fedoraproject.org>>>
> > > > <mailto:389-users at lists.fedoraproject.org
> <mailto:389-users at lists.fedoraproject.org>
> > <mailto:389-users at lists.fedoraproject.org
> <mailto:389-users at lists.fedoraproject.org>>
> > > <mailto:389-users at lists.fedoraproject.org
> <mailto:389-users at lists.fedoraproject.org>
> > <mailto:389-users at lists.fedoraproject.org
> <mailto:389-users at lists.fedoraproject.org>>>>>
> > > > > >
> > > <mailto:389-users at lists.fedoraproject.org
> <mailto:389-users at lists.fedoraproject.org>
> > <mailto:389-users at lists.fedoraproject.org
> <mailto:389-users at lists.fedoraproject.org>>
> > > <mailto:389-users at lists.fedoraproject.org
> <mailto:389-users at lists.fedoraproject.org>
> > <mailto:389-users at lists.fedoraproject.org
> <mailto:389-users at lists.fedoraproject.org>>>
> > > > <mailto:389-users at lists.fedoraproject.org
> <mailto:389-users at lists.fedoraproject.org>
> > <mailto:389-users at lists.fedoraproject.org
> <mailto:389-users at lists.fedoraproject.org>>
> > > <mailto:389-users at lists.fedoraproject.org
> <mailto:389-users at lists.fedoraproject.org>
> > <mailto:389-users at lists.fedoraproject.org
> <mailto:389-users at lists.fedoraproject.org>>>>
> > > > >
> <mailto:389-users at lists.fedoraproject.org
> <mailto:389-users at lists.fedoraproject.org>
> > <mailto:389-users at lists.fedoraproject.org
> <mailto:389-users at lists.fedoraproject.org>>
> > > <mailto:389-users at lists.fedoraproject.org
> <mailto:389-users at lists.fedoraproject.org>
> > <mailto:389-users at lists.fedoraproject.org
> <mailto:389-users at lists.fedoraproject.org>>>
> > > > <mailto:389-users at lists.fedoraproject.org
> <mailto:389-users at lists.fedoraproject.org>
> > <mailto:389-users at lists.fedoraproject.org
> <mailto:389-users at lists.fedoraproject.org>>
> > > <mailto:389-users at lists.fedoraproject.org
> <mailto:389-users at lists.fedoraproject.org>
> > <mailto:389-users at lists.fedoraproject.org
> <mailto:389-users at lists.fedoraproject.org>>>>>>
> > > > > >
> > > >
> > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > > >
> > > > > > --
> > > > > > 389 users mailing list
> > > > > > 389-users at lists.fedoraproject.org
> <mailto:389-users at lists.fedoraproject.org>
> > <mailto:389-users at lists.fedoraproject.org
> <mailto:389-users at lists.fedoraproject.org>>
> > > <mailto:389-users at lists.fedoraproject.org
> <mailto:389-users at lists.fedoraproject.org>
> > <mailto:389-users at lists.fedoraproject.org
> <mailto:389-users at lists.fedoraproject.org>>>
> > > > <mailto:389-users at lists.fedoraproject.org
> <mailto:389-users at lists.fedoraproject.org>
> > <mailto:389-users at lists.fedoraproject.org
> <mailto:389-users at lists.fedoraproject.org>>
> > > <mailto:389-users at lists.fedoraproject.org
> <mailto:389-users at lists.fedoraproject.org>
> > <mailto:389-users at lists.fedoraproject.org
> <mailto:389-users at lists.fedoraproject.org>>>>
> > > > >
> <mailto:389-users at lists.fedoraproject.org
> <mailto:389-users at lists.fedoraproject.org>
> > <mailto:389-users at lists.fedoraproject.org
> <mailto:389-users at lists.fedoraproject.org>>
> > > <mailto:389-users at lists.fedoraproject.org
> <mailto:389-users at lists.fedoraproject.org>
> > <mailto:389-users at lists.fedoraproject.org
> <mailto:389-users at lists.fedoraproject.org>>>
> > > > <mailto:389-users at lists.fedoraproject.org
> <mailto:389-users at lists.fedoraproject.org>
> > <mailto:389-users at lists.fedoraproject.org
> <mailto:389-users at lists.fedoraproject.org>>
> > > <mailto:389-users at lists.fedoraproject.org
> <mailto:389-users at lists.fedoraproject.org>
> > <mailto:389-users at lists.fedoraproject.org
> <mailto:389-users at lists.fedoraproject.org>>>>>
> > > > > >
> > > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > > 389 users mailing list
> > > > > 389-users at lists.fedoraproject.org
> <mailto:389-users at lists.fedoraproject.org>
> > <mailto:389-users at lists.fedoraproject.org
> <mailto:389-users at lists.fedoraproject.org>>
> > > <mailto:389-users at lists.fedoraproject.org
> <mailto:389-users at lists.fedoraproject.org>
> > <mailto:389-users at lists.fedoraproject.org
> <mailto:389-users at lists.fedoraproject.org>>>
> > > > <mailto:389-users at lists.fedoraproject.org
> <mailto:389-users at lists.fedoraproject.org>
> > <mailto:389-users at lists.fedoraproject.org
> <mailto:389-users at lists.fedoraproject.org>>
> > > <mailto:389-users at lists.fedoraproject.org
> <mailto:389-users at lists.fedoraproject.org>
> > <mailto:389-users at lists.fedoraproject.org
> <mailto:389-users at lists.fedoraproject.org>>>>
> > > > >
> <mailto:389-users at lists.fedoraproject.org
> <mailto:389-users at lists.fedoraproject.org>
> > <mailto:389-users at lists.fedoraproject.org
> <mailto:389-users at lists.fedoraproject.org>>
> > > <mailto:389-users at lists.fedoraproject.org
> <mailto:389-users at lists.fedoraproject.org>
> > <mailto:389-users at lists.fedoraproject.org
> <mailto:389-users at lists.fedoraproject.org>>>
> > > > <mailto:389-users at lists.fedoraproject.org
> <mailto:389-users at lists.fedoraproject.org>
> > <mailto:389-users at lists.fedoraproject.org
> <mailto:389-users at lists.fedoraproject.org>>
> > > <mailto:389-users at lists.fedoraproject.org
> <mailto:389-users at lists.fedoraproject.org>
> > <mailto:389-users at lists.fedoraproject.org
> <mailto:389-users at lists.fedoraproject.org>>>>>
> > > > >
> > > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > > 389 users mailing list
> > > > > 389-users at lists.fedoraproject.org
> <mailto:389-users at lists.fedoraproject.org>
> > <mailto:389-users at lists.fedoraproject.org
> <mailto:389-users at lists.fedoraproject.org>>
> > > <mailto:389-users at lists.fedoraproject.org
> <mailto:389-users at lists.fedoraproject.org>
> > <mailto:389-users at lists.fedoraproject.org
> <mailto:389-users at lists.fedoraproject.org>>>
> > > > <mailto:389-users at lists.fedoraproject.org
> <mailto:389-users at lists.fedoraproject.org>
> > <mailto:389-users at lists.fedoraproject.org
> <mailto:389-users at lists.fedoraproject.org>>
> > > <mailto:389-users at lists.fedoraproject.org
> <mailto:389-users at lists.fedoraproject.org>
> > <mailto:389-users at lists.fedoraproject.org
> <mailto:389-users at lists.fedoraproject.org>>>>
> > > > >
> > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > 389 users mailing list
> > > > 389-users at lists.fedoraproject.org
> <mailto:389-users at lists.fedoraproject.org>
> > <mailto:389-users at lists.fedoraproject.org
> <mailto:389-users at lists.fedoraproject.org>>
> > > <mailto:389-users at lists.fedoraproject.org
> <mailto:389-users at lists.fedoraproject.org>
> > <mailto:389-users at lists.fedoraproject.org
> <mailto:389-users at lists.fedoraproject.org>>>
> > > > <mailto:389-users at lists.fedoraproject.org
> <mailto:389-users at lists.fedoraproject.org>
> > <mailto:389-users at lists.fedoraproject.org
> <mailto:389-users at lists.fedoraproject.org>>
> > > <mailto:389-users at lists.fedoraproject.org
> <mailto:389-users at lists.fedoraproject.org>
> > <mailto:389-users at lists.fedoraproject.org
> <mailto:389-users at lists.fedoraproject.org>>>>
> > > >
> > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > 389 users mailing list
> > > > 389-users at lists.fedoraproject.org
> <mailto:389-users at lists.fedoraproject.org>
> > <mailto:389-users at lists.fedoraproject.org
> <mailto:389-users at lists.fedoraproject.org>>
> > > <mailto:389-users at lists.fedoraproject.org
> <mailto:389-users at lists.fedoraproject.org>
> > <mailto:389-users at lists.fedoraproject.org
> <mailto:389-users at lists.fedoraproject.org>>>
> > > >
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users
> > >
> > > --
> > > 389 users mailing list
> > > 389-users at lists.fedoraproject.org
> <mailto:389-users at lists.fedoraproject.org>
> > <mailto:389-users at lists.fedoraproject.org
> <mailto:389-users at lists.fedoraproject.org>>
> > > <mailto:389-users at lists.fedoraproject.org
> <mailto:389-users at lists.fedoraproject.org>
> > <mailto:389-users at lists.fedoraproject.org
> <mailto:389-users at lists.fedoraproject.org>>>
> > > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > >
> > > --
> > > 389 users mailing list
> > > 389-users at lists.fedoraproject.org
> <mailto:389-users at lists.fedoraproject.org>
> > <mailto:389-users at lists.fedoraproject.org
> <mailto:389-users at lists.fedoraproject.org>>
> > > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users
> >
> > --
> > 389 users mailing list
> > 389-users at lists.fedoraproject.org
> <mailto:389-users at lists.fedoraproject.org>
> > <mailto:389-users at lists.fedoraproject.org
> <mailto:389-users at lists.fedoraproject.org>>
> > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users
> >
> >
> >
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> > --
> > 389 users mailing list
> > 389-users at lists.fedoraproject.org
> <mailto:389-users at lists.fedoraproject.org>
> > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users
>
> --
> 389 users mailing list
> 389-users at lists.fedoraproject.org
> <mailto:389-users at lists.fedoraproject.org>
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> --
> 389 users mailing list
> 389-users at lists.fedoraproject.org
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users
More information about the 389-users
mailing list