[389-users] is anybody having problems with latest selinux policy update in F12?

[Rich Megginson]

me wrote:
> hi Rich
> do you know why it all broke so suddenly with latest update for base policy?
>   
yes - miscommuncation between the 389 team and the selinux team

> for some users it could be kind of a disaster, if now base policy is 
> lacking rules for 389
> then some other dependencies, like ones you said of, should be pulled in 
> automatically
> for me it looked like that, everything just crashed, like if there was 
> no major part
> of 389's things in base selinux policy.
>   
The selinux team would like packages that are selinux aware to provide 
their own policy which is what 389 will be doing from now on. 
> I've just yumed 389-ds and no extra deps were looked for with regards to 
> selinux
> tracking seliunx events and rendering custom module for inevitable
> I guess lots of people on F12 were having lots of problems today
>   
I'm still trying to get my F12 system up to date.  I would guess the 
389-ds package has not yet hit the mirrors.
> cheers
>
> On 03/03/2010 03:07 PM, Rich Megginson wrote:
>   
>> me wrote:
>>    
>>     
>>> regards
>>>
>>>      
>>>       
>> 389-ds-base 1.2.6.a2 has a selinux sub-package - 389-ds-base-selinux -
>> and 389-admin-1.1.11.a2 also - 389-admin-selinux - these are currently
>> in the testing repos - yum install/upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing
>> 389-ds-base-selinux 389-admin-selinux
>> Not sure if these packages have hit all of the mirrors yet, but if they
>> have, try them out (and give us some feedback!)
>>    
>>     
>>> --
>>> 389 users mailing list
>>> 389-users at lists.fedoraproject.org
>>> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users
>>>
>>>      
>>>       
>> --
>> 389 users mailing list
>> 389-users at lists.fedoraproject.org
>> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users
>>    
>>     
> --
> 389 users mailing list
> 389-users at lists.fedoraproject.org
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users
>