[389-users] Fwd: [389-announce] Please Help Test 389 Directory Server 1.2.7

[Andrey Ivanov]

Hi Nathan,

>
> Prior to 1.2.7, how was this configuration working for you?  What sort of
> values were you setting in the "uniqueMember" attribute?  The memberOf
> plug-in really needs a full DN to work, which is why the restriction to use
> an attribute with the DN syntax was added.

We use the uniqueMember attribute in a rather typical manner for group
objects: to list the DNs of the sub-groups and members :

cn=My Group,ou=Groups,dc=example,dc=com
objectClass: top
objectClass: groupofuniquenames
cn: My Group
uniqueMember: uid=someone,ou=Users,dc=example,dc=com
uniqueMember: cn=Another Group,ou=Groups,dc=example,dc=com

It's a relatively common way of uniqueMember usage, not limited to our
environment, i think.

@+