[389-users] Error using db2ldif to backup NetscapeRoot

[Diego Woitasen]

On Mon, Apr 25, 2011 at 1:26 PM, Diego Woitasen <diego at woitasen.com.ar>wrote:

>
>
> On Mon, Apr 25, 2011 at 1:19 PM, Rich Megginson <rmeggins at redhat.com>wrote:
>
>>  On 04/25/2011 10:13 AM, Diego Woitasen wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>  I'm using db2ldiff to backup all my databases (139). It works fine for
>> all databases but NetscapeRoot.The ldiff is written but there is an weird
>> output when I run the command:
>>
>>   /opt/dirsrv/lib/dirsrv/slapd-mreldc03/db2ldif -n NetscapeRoot -a
>> /tmp/xx
>> Exported ldif file: /tmp/xx
>> ldiffile: /tmp/xx
>> [25/Apr/2011:13:02:12 -0300] ldif2dbm - _get_and_add_parent_rdns: Failed
>> to position at ID 170
>> [25/Apr/2011:13:02:12 -0300] - ldbm2ldif: Failed to get dn of ID 170
>> [25/Apr/2011:13:02:12 -0300] ldif2dbm - _get_and_add_parent_rdns: Failed
>> to position at ID 170
>> [25/Apr/2011:13:02:12 -0300] - ldbm2ldif: Failed to get dn of ID 171
>> [25/Apr/2011:13:02:12 -0300] ldif2dbm - _get_and_add_parent_rdns: Failed
>> to position at ID 170
>> [25/Apr/2011:13:02:12 -0300] - ldbm2ldif: Failed to get dn of ID 172
>> [25/Apr/2011:13:02:12 -0300] ldif2dbm - _get_and_add_parent_rdns: Failed
>> to position at ID 170
>> .
>> .
>> .
>>  .
>>  [25/Apr/2011:13:11:28 -0300] - ldbm2ldif: Failed to get dn of ID 337
>> [25/Apr/2011:13:11:28 -0300] ldif2dbm - _get_and_add_parent_rdns: Failed
>> to position at ID 294
>> [25/Apr/2011:13:11:28 -0300] - ldbm2ldif: Failed to get dn of ID 325
>> [25/Apr/2011:13:11:28 -0300] ldif2dbm - _get_and_add_parent_rdns: Failed
>> to position at ID 294
>> [25/Apr/2011:13:11:28 -0300] - ldbm2ldif: Failed to get dn of ID 353
>> [25/Apr/2011:13:11:28 -0300] ldif2dbm - _get_and_add_parent_rdns: Failed
>> to position at ID 294
>> [25/Apr/2011:13:11:28 -0300] - ldbm2ldif: Failed to get dn of ID 353
>> [25/Apr/2011:13:11:28 -0300] - export NetscapeRoot: Processed 267 entries
>> (100%).
>> [25/Apr/2011:13:11:28 -0300] - All database threads now stopped
>>
>>
>>  Shall I worry about that lines?
>>
>> 389-ds-base version?  If not 1.2.8.2, can you try with 1.2.8.2?
>>
>>
>>  Regards,
>>  Diego
>>
>> --
>> Diego Woitasen
>>
>>
>> --
>> 389 users mailing list389-users at lists.fedoraproject.orghttps://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users
>>
>>
>>
>
> /opt/dirsrv/sbin/ns-slapd --version
> 389 Project
> 389-Directory/1.2.8.2 B2011.105.012
>
>
> --
> Diego Woitasen
>


I don't know if this is important or not but database was created with a
previus version, 1.2.7.5 I think. I don't remember exactly, but is 1.2.5.7
or newer.



-- 
Diego Woitasen
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/389-users/attachments/20110425/b50b374a/attachment.html>