[389-users] Replication

Brian LaMere brian at cukerinteractive.com
Fri Jan 14 17:32:59 UTC 2011


Odd, I got MMR working with SSL...and I only referenced that documentation
(well, and assistance from this list and the IRC room...).  It was 1.2.6,
but surely that didn't really change things?

Sounds like everyone is agreeing (even if indirectly) that the documentation
is outdated though - is it due to work focusing on FreeIPA?  Some say good
software with bad documentation is worse than bad software with good
documentation...I'm a hands-on guy so I would disagree, but I do see the
point none the less.

I did make a few howtos for internal use, covering everything from setting
up the first server, getting SSL working, getting replication working, then
getting OSX and Linux hosts pulling from the mess.  They were docs meant for
me to read (complete with the shorthand and shortcuts that I understand) but
if you have problems then let me know and I'll see what I can clean up.  As
it so happens, I'm setting up an all new MMR 389 pair in the next few days
(our company is somewhat splitting, and I don't want to have it be different
trees on the same directory)...so I'll know pretty quick if something has
changed the last half-year.  Hell, if you were maybe going to be working on
it in the next few days anyway, we can sortof step through it together
online - just let me know.

Brian

On Tue, Jan 11, 2011 at 1:14 PM, crashingdaily <crashingdaily at gmail.com>wrote:

> On Jan 11, 2011, at 3:50 PM, Rich Megginson wrote:
>
> > On 01/11/2011 01:40 PM, harry.devine at faa.gov wrote:
> >>
> >> We just ran the mmr.pl script from server 1, and the data got
> >> replicated across to server 2.  If we create a new user on server
> >> 2, it does not get replicated to server 1.  It appears to be a 1
> >> way replication.
> > mmr.pl has bit rotted - no one maintains it any more - you're on
> > your own if you decide to use it - patches/maintainer welcome
>
>
> I've successfully used mmr.pl (last time with 389 1.2.6.1). I would
> try restarting your two 389 instances, and if that doesn't magically
> fix it, use the mmr.pl script to --remove the existing replication
> agreement and then add it back while keeping an eye on the 389 logs
> for errors. I've had rare cases where I've had to run mmr.pl twice to
> get it to take.
>
> The --with-ssl option was broken in the last version I used (but
> that's clearly not the cause of Harry's issue). For working patched
> version, should you want SSL replication, see
>
> http://crashingdaily.wordpress.com/2010/11/13/fixing-the-mmr-pl-script-for-ssl/
>
>
>
> >>
> >> Any thoughts?
> >> Harry
> >>
> >> Harry Devine
> >> Common ARTS Software Development
> >> AJT-144
> >> (609)485-4218
> >> Harry.Devine at faa.gov
> >>
> >> -----Rich Megginson <rmeggins at redhat.com> wrote: -----
> >>
> >> To: "General discussion list for the 389 Directory server project."
> >> <389-users at lists.fedoraproject.org>
> >> From: Rich Megginson <rmeggins at redhat.com>
> >> Date: 01/11/2011 03:09PM
> >> cc: Harry Devine/ACT/FAA at FAA, Ted Rush/ACT/FAA at FAA
> >> Subject: Re: [389-users] Replication
> >>
> >> On 01/11/2011 12:53 PM, harry.devine at faa.gov wrote:
> >>>
> >>> OK, so we are testing 389-ds in our environment (version
> >>> 1.2.7.5).  We have 1 machine set up with user accounts, and we
> >>> just set another one up.  The new one doesn't have any accounts or
> >>> anything on it yet.  We would like to get replication going
> >>> between the 2 DS's, but can't find any current documention on how
> >>> to do it.  When we set up the 2nd machine, we set it up as if it
> >>> were its own DS (i.e. not tied into the existing one).  Not sure
> >>> it that is relevant, but I thought I'd mention it for full
> >>> disclosure.
> >> Should not be a problem.
> >>>
> >>> We'd like to have this be a 2-way multi-master replication, so if
> >>> our main DS server ever went down, the 2nd one could pick up and
> >>> service login requests.  Is there any current documention that
> >>> explains this anywhere?
> >>
> >>
> http://docs.redhat.com/docs/en-US/Red_Hat_Directory_Server/8.2/html-single/Administration_Guide/index.html#Managing_Replication
> >>> Is multi-master the correct method to use for this type of setup?
> >> Yes.
> >>>
> >>> Thanks,
> >>> Harry
> >>>
> >>> Harry Devine
> >>> Common ARTS Software Development
> >>> AJT-144
> >>> (609)485-4218
> >>> Harry.Devine at faa.gov
> >>>
> >>> --
> >>> 389 users mailing list
> >>> 389-users at lists.fedoraproject.org
> >>> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users
> >>
> >>
> >
> > --
> > 389 users mailing list
> > 389-users at lists.fedoraproject.org
> > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users
>
> --
> 389 users mailing list
> 389-users at lists.fedoraproject.org
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/389-users/attachments/20110114/fc0db5ef/attachment.html>


More information about the 389-users mailing list