[389-users] Sync AD with 389-DS Unable to parse response

Rich Megginson rmeggins at redhat.com
Tue Jan 25 15:14:03 UTC 2011


On 01/25/2011 01:29 AM, remy d1 wrote:
> Hi Rich,
>
> I tried to raise the log level, but when I did it, I was not able to 
> stop/restart my dirsrv service.
What log level did you use?  What error messages did you see when you 
attempted to stop/restart the service?  Anything in the errors log?
> To stop it, I must kill the process and remove the pid file. Then I 
> could start it.
>
> In my error logs, there is a lot of informations :
>
>
> [root at KingKong ~]# tail /var/log/dirsrv/slapd-KingKong/errors
> [24/Jan/2011:16:18:30 +0100] NSMMReplicationPlugin - changelog program 
> - cl5GetOperationCount: could not get DB object for replica
> [24/Jan/2011:16:18:30 +0100] NSMMReplicationPlugin - changelog program 
> - _cl5GetDBFile: no DB object found for database 
> /var/lib/dirsrv/slapd-KingKong/changelogdb/1d934402-27b111e0-b651ef2e-02b602d3_4d0b28870000ffff0000.db4
> [24/Jan/2011:16:18:30 +0100] NSMMReplicationPlugin - changelog program 
> - cl5GetOperationCount: could not get DB object for replica
> [24/Jan/2011:16:18:40 +0100] NSMMReplicationPlugin - changelog program 
> - _cl5GetDBFile: no DB object found for database 
> /var/lib/dirsrv/slapd-KingKong/changelogdb/1d934402-27b111e0-b651ef2e-02b602d3_4d0b28870000ffff0000.db4
> [24/Jan/2011:16:18:40 +0100] NSMMReplicationPlugin - changelog program 
> - cl5GetOperationCount: could not get DB object for replica
> [24/Jan/2011:16:18:41 +0100] NSMMReplicationPlugin - changelog program 
> - _cl5GetDBFile: no DB object found for database 
> /var/lib/dirsrv/slapd-KingKong/changelogdb/1d934402-27b111e0-b651ef2e-02b602d3_4d0b28870000ffff0000.db4
> [24/Jan/2011:16:18:41 +0100] NSMMReplicationPlugin - changelog program 
> - cl5GetOperationCount: could not get DB object for replica
> [24/Jan/2011:16:18:42 +0100] NSMMReplicationPlugin - changelog program 
> - _cl5GetDBFile: no DB object found for database 
> /var/lib/dirsrv/slapd-KingKong/changelogdb/1d934402-27b111e0-b651ef2e-02b602d3_4d0b28870000ffff0000.db4
> [24/Jan/2011:16:18:42 +0100] NSMMReplicationPlugin - changelog program 
> - cl5GetOperationCount: could not get DB object for replica
> [24/Jan/2011:16:24:18 +0100] NSMMReplicationPlugin - changelog program 
> - cl5ExportLDIF: failed to locate changelog file for replica at 
> (dc=mydomain,dc=com)
>
>
> This problem is very similar to this post :
> http://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-directory-commits/2009-March/msg00005.html
> Although I have the last version of 389-DS.
Are you sure this is the correct post you wanted to refer to?  Because 
this is a patch commit for a fix when moving the changelog directory - 
did you move the changelog directory?  Because you did not mention it in 
your earlier post.
>
> I think I have also some troubleshooting with my hostname because bind 
> is not configured. However, I have choosen to put it my /etc/hosts file
> [root at KingKong ~]# nl /etc/host.conf
>      1    multi on
>      2    order hosts,bind
> hostname command reply the full "fqdn" if I choose the option 
> --all-fqdn, contrary to the option "--fqdn". The reply is just my 
> hostname without the domain. By the way, if I say
> #hostname KingKong.mydomain.com <http://KingKong.mydomain.com>
> Eveything is now good for my hostname but I can not launch my 
> 389-console. I think the adress to connect is not ok... I do not know 
> if this problem is linked to the previous problems...
>
> So, I do #hostname KingKong
> Then, I launch the console again. Now, if I try to initiate a full 
> synchronization, I can see (and I am still stuck on it) the window 
> "please wait while data is being synchronized...", but nothing else... 
> Data are not synchronized and I do not see anything in my Windows 
> event viewer while replica agreement seems to be ok and PassSync 
> service is installed...
It is very difficult to change your hostname after you have configured 
the admin server and console.  I suggest starting over from scratch, and 
first make sure your hostname is correct.

I also suggest using 
http://docs.redhat.com/docs/en-US/Red_Hat_Directory_Server/8.2/html-single/Administration_Guide/index.html#Windows_Sync 
to configure Windows Sync.
>
>
> Thanks for help,
>
> -Regards
>
> 2011/1/21 Rich Megginson <rmeggins at redhat.com 
> <mailto:rmeggins at redhat.com>>
>
>>     Date:
>>     Fri, 21 Jan 2011 10:25:56 +0100
>>     To:
>>     "General discussion list for the 389 Directory server project."
>>     <389-users at lists.fedoraproject.org>
>>     <mailto:389-users at lists.fedoraproject.org>
>>
>>
>>     Hi Rich,
>>
>>     Thanks for this usefull link.
>>
>>     I have successfully initiate replica between Windows AD and my
>>     server 389-DS. Ldapsearch is working. But even if everything
>>     seems to be ok, the update does not work and I do not see any
>>     error in the log files... So, my AD server stay empty, the
>>     accounts are not migrate...
>>
>>     Here you have my access log file which is more verbose...
>>     (mydomain.com <http://mydomain.com> for the example) :
>     <snip>
>>     Obviously I am connecting to the server 389-DS itself whereas it
>>     can resolve the DNS name of my Windows server... There is no
>>     error in the AD event viewer while I could see errors on it when
>>     it was misconfigured (like DirSync errors)... So, basically, the
>>     Windows server is contacted to my DS-Server over 2 different
>>     networks.
>>
>>     Do you think I have to open the ports described in my message ?
>>
>>     -Regards.
>     I don't know.  There is no winsync information in the access log. 
>     Note that the access log records client accesses to the directory
>     server, and in winsync, the directory server itself acts as a
>     client to AD, so winsync will log nothing in the access log.  The
>     errors log could be helpful, and especially using the replication
>     log level (which is also used for winsync logging).  The Windows
>     Event Viewer is useless for winsync issues.
>
>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/389-users/attachments/20110125/34746afa/attachment.html>


More information about the 389-users mailing list