[389-users] Reg ldif file import/export and ldap replication over ldaps

Rich Megginson rmeggins at redhat.com
Tue Jun 14 14:56:56 UTC 2011


On 06/14/2011 08:23 AM, s.varadha rajan wrote:
> Hi,
> I followed the procedure to configure "multi-master replication" as 
> per 
> http://directory.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Howto:MultiMasterReplication. 
> but i got an error as
>
> _From consumer side:_
>
> 14/Jun/2011:19:25:41 +051800] NSMMReplicationPlugin - 
> multimaster_be_state_change: replica o=netscaperoot is coming online; 
> enabling replication
> [14/Jun/2011:19:25:41 +051800] NSMMReplicationPlugin - 
> replica_reload_ruv: Warning: new data for replica o=netscaperoot does 
> not match the data in the changelog.
>  Recreating the changelog file. This could affect replication with 
> replica's  consumers in which case the consumers should be reinitialized.
This is not an error.  It just means the consumer has been initialized 
with data from the master, and it had old data (probably from setup) 
which was wiped out.
>
> _From Supplier side:_
>
> [14/Jun/2011:19:26:12 +051800] NSMMReplicationPlugin - Beginning total 
> update of replica "agmt="cn="Replication from varad.xxx.xxx.com 
> <http://varad.xxx.xxx.com> port 389 to sam.xxx.xxx.com 
> <http://sam.xxx.xxx.com> port 389"" (sam:389)".
> [14/Jun/2011:19:26:15 +051800] NSMMReplicationPlugin - Finished total 
> update of replica "agmt="cn="Replication from varad.xxx.xxx.com 
> <http://varad.xxx.xxx.com> port 389 to sam.xxx.xxx.com 
> <http://sam.xxx.xxx.com> port 389"" (sam:389)". Sent 120 entries.
>
>
> We are using the OS-Ubuntu 10.04. I searched in google and got the 
> some result in "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=388021". 
> but i dont know how to fix this.Please help on this.
>
> Regards,
> Varad
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On Mon, May 30, 2011 at 12:27 PM, s.varadha rajan 
> <rajanvaradhu at gmail.com <mailto:rajanvaradhu at gmail.com>> wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > Thanks for the reply.I will try and update you further.
> >
> > Regards,
> > Varad
> >
> >
> >
> > On Fri, May 27, 2011 at 8:30 PM, Rich Megginson <rmeggins at redhat.com 
> <mailto:rmeggins at redhat.com>> wrote:
> >>
> >> On 05/27/2011 12:11 AM, s.varadha rajan wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> Can i get any update on my below query ?
> >>
> >> Regards,
> >> Varad
> >>
> >> On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 6:17 PM, s.varadha rajan 
> <rajanvaradhu at gmail.com <mailto:rajanvaradhu at gmail.com>> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Hi,
> >>> We are using Ubuntu 10.04 server OS and all the web applications 
> are running on that.We have already implemented fedora-ds for ldap 
> auth.now we are planning to go some up-gradation.kindly let me know 
> the following,
> >>> 1.How to migrate running fedora-ds server to another server ?
> >>> 2.i have taken all the user/group+etc in ldif format.is 
> <http://format.is> it enough for migration or any other db 
> (/var/lib/dirsrv/slapd-<instance>) also need to bacup ?
> >>
> >> LDIF should be fine.
> >>>
> >>> if any procedure please share with me ? how to import/export .ldif 
> file
> >>
> >> /usr/lib[64]/dirsrv/slapd-INSTNAME/db2ldif - export database to ldif
> >> /usr/lib[64]/dirsrv/slapd-INSTNAME/ldif2db - import database from ldif
> >>>
> >>> 3.in <http://3.in> our setup,one server is in public network.so i 
> am planning to do replication through "ldaps", i.e local server to 
> public server replication through highly secure how to ?
> >>
> >> Not exactly, but there is plenty of documentation - see 
> http://docs.redhat.com/docs/en-US/Red_Hat_Directory_Server/8.2/html-single/Administration_Guide/index.html#Managing_Replication-Replication_Overview
> >>>
> >>> Please help me on the above topics.
> >>> Regards,
> >>> Varad
> >>
> >> --
> >> 389 users mailing list
> >> 389-users at lists.fedoraproject.org 
> <mailto:389-users at lists.fedoraproject.org>
> >> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users
> >
>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/389-users/attachments/20110614/0ad6766c/attachment.html>


More information about the 389-users mailing list