[389-users] 389/RHDS Compatibility in Enterprise
Rich Megginson
rmeggins at redhat.com
Thu Mar 3 22:56:49 UTC 2011
On 03/03/2011 03:42 PM, Alaric wrote:
> Hi folks
>
> At $WORKk we are having a discusion about the scalability of
> different directory server products, and I thought I'd reach out and
> see anyone had any information that I could feed back into
> our dialogue. There are three main points that i'm curious about,
> first the statement was made that Red Hat doesn't suggest RHDS 8.* for
> use in enterprise environments
This is not true. Where did this information come from?
> and instead suggests an LDAP server that uses or comes with Jboss
> (OpenDS or OpenLDAP maybe? I was a bit unclear on this point... ).
Also not true. Where did this information come from?
> Second, 389/RHDS is in fact just Sun Directory Server 5.0.
No, it is several generations ahead of Sun DS 5.0. See
http://directory.fedoraproject.org/wiki/History
> And finally that RHDS/389 isn't compatible with the following products:
>
> Weblogic 10g+
>
> WebSphere 6+
>
> OAM 10g/11g
>
> OVD 11g
>
> OIF 11gR3
>
> OAAM 11g
>
> OIM 11gR2
>
> Sun IdM v6.1, 7.2, 8.1.1
>
Not sure about this. We don't certify with these, but if they work with
standard LDAPv3 servers, they should work with RHDS/389.
>
>
> I'd really like to be able to provide some constructive feedback to
> my collages, since the feels like a matter of misunderstanding and
> an opportunity to educate each other.
>
>
> Thanks in advance for any feedback!
>
>
> -a
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> 389 users mailing list
> 389-users at lists.fedoraproject.org
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/389-users/attachments/20110303/085a2ce9/attachment.html>
More information about the 389-users
mailing list