[389-users] MMR issue, when deleting the replica setup.

Rich Megginson rmeggins at redhat.com
Tue May 10 15:05:17 UTC 2011


On 05/10/2011 08:34 AM, Reinhard Nappert wrote:
> Rick,
> it seems that the issue does not exist in 1.2.8.2. I just compiled and 
> installed it.
> If 1.2.8.2 is stable, I won't bother open a bug for it......
Ok, thanks for confirming.  1.2.8.3 is in Testing now - I'm going to 
push that to Stable in the next couple of days.
> -Reinhard
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> *From:* Rich Megginson [mailto:rmeggins at redhat.com]
> *Sent:* Monday, May 09, 2011 9:37 PM
> *To:* General discussion list for the 389 Directory server project.
> *Cc:* Reinhard Nappert
> *Subject:* Re: [389-users] MMR issue, when deleting the replica setup.
>
> On 05/09/2011 02:06 PM, Reinhard Nappert wrote:
>> Hi,
>> I noticed an issue with 389 DS 1.2.7.5, which I have not seen before. 
>> Here is what I do:
>> 1. I create a two multi-master setup.
>> 2. I don't perform any changes on the directory.
>> 3. I delete the replica setup on both systems -- everything is fine.
>> 4. I create a two multi-master setup.
>> 5. Perform changes on both systems
>> 6. Modifications get replicated.
>> 7 I delete the replica setup. No I get the following error logs:
>> [09/May/2011:15:43:18 -0400] - import userRoot: Import complete.  
>> Processed 446 entries in 4 seconds. (111.50 entries/sec)
>> [09/May/2011:15:43:18 -0400] NSMMReplicationPlugin - 
>> multimaster_be_state_change: replica o=base is coming online; 
>> enabling replication
>> ...
>> [09/May/2011:15:45:21 -0400] NSMMReplicationPlugin - agmt_delete: begin
>> [09/May/2011:15:45:22 -0400] NSMMReplicationPlugin - 
>> replica_config_delete: Warning: The changelog for replica o=BASE is 
>> no longer valid since the replica config is being deleted.  Removing 
>> the changelog.
>> [09/May/2011:15:45:22 -0400] NSMMReplicationPlugin - changelog 
>> program - _cl5Add Thread: invalid changelog state - 2 <== This is good!
>> [09/May/2011:15:45:27 -0400] - libdb: <path 
>> to>/changelogdb/7773fd02-7a7411e0-ac71f4b1-0fb2d026_4dc840d3000000020000.db4: 
>> unable to flush: No such file or directory
>> [09/May/2011:15:45:27 -0400] - libdb: txn_checkpoint: failed to flush 
>> the buffer cache No such file or directory
>> [09/May/2011:15:45:27 -0400] - Serious Error---Failed to checkpoint 
>> database, err=2 (No such file or directory)
>> Of course, the changelog directory was gone. It looks to me that the 
>> server keeps this still somehow in memory.
>> I enabled the audit-logging: This is what I see there:
>> time: 20110509154521
>> dn: cn=changelog5,cn=config
>> changetype: delete
>> modifiersname: <credentials>
>> time: 20110509154522
>> dn: cn=agreement1,cn=replica,cn=o\3dbase,cn=mapping tree,cn=config
>> changetype: delete
>> modifiersname: <credentials>
>> time: 20110509154522
>> dn: cn=replica,cn=o\3dbase,cn=mapping tree,cn=config
>> changetype: delete
>> modifiersname: <credentials>
>> time: 20110509154522
>> dn: cn=o\3dbase,cn=mapping tree,cn=config
>> changetype: modify
>> replace: nsslapd-state
>> nsslapd-state: backend
>> -
>> replace: nsslapd-referral
>> -
>> replace: modifiersname
>> modifiersname: <credentials>-
>> replace: modifytimestamp
>> -
>> replace: nsslapd-referral
>> -
>> replace: modifiersname
>> modifiersname: <credentials>
>> -
>> replace: modifytimestamp
>> modifytimestamp: 20110509194522Z
>> -
>> time: 20110509154605
>> dn: cn=uniqueid generator,cn=config
>> changetype: modify
>> replace: nsState
>> nsState:: AM+94nR64AH0sQ+y0CZxbAEAAAAAAAAA
>> -
>> replace: modifiersname
>> modifiersname: cn=server,cn=plugins,cn=config
>> -
>> replace: modifytimestamp
>> modifytimestamp: 20110509194605Z
>> -
>> Has somebody has seen this before.
> No, please file a bug.
>> Thanks,
>> -Reinhard
>>
>>
>> --
>> 389 users mailing list
>> 389-users at lists.fedoraproject.org
>> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users
>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/389-users/attachments/20110510/04cdd2a7/attachment.html>


More information about the 389-users mailing list