[389-users] Quick Upgrade question

Noriko Hosoi nhosoi at redhat.com
Tue Sep 27 19:57:55 UTC 2011


Hi Reinhard,

Reinhard Nappert wrote:
> Thanks Noriko.
> I need to get an confirmation, but I am pretty sure that there are no 
> quotes or backslashes in the DN. Having said that, the directory 
> should be fine, right?
If that's the case, your Directory server should be safe.
> How is this bug you mentioned triggered? I am curious, because I have 
> never seen this before.
Account lockout password policy was not upgraded properly and this bug 
was revealed.
> One more question: Since the upgradednformat failed, the database was 
> not indexed during the upgrade.
I don't think upgradednformat reindexes the database...  But if you are 
not comfortable, you could reindex the database manually.
--noriko
> Is this is a problem?
> -Reinhard
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> *From:* 389-users-bounces at lists.fedoraproject.org 
> [mailto:389-users-bounces at lists.fedoraproject.org] *On Behalf Of 
> *Noriko Hosoi
> *Sent:* Tuesday, September 27, 2011 2:13 PM
> *To:* General discussion list for the 389 Directory server project.
> *Subject:* Re: [389-users] Quick Upgrade question
>
> You might have hit an upgradednformat bug; "upgradednformat failed to 
> add RDN value", which was fixed in 1.2.9.
>
> Unless your old DB contains old format DNs, there is no impact there.  
> Do you see double quotes and/or backslashes in your DN strings?
>
> --noriko
>
> Reinhard Nappert wrote:
>> Hi,
>> I was wondering if the following was observed somewhere else.
>> I am upgrading 1.1.2 to 1.2.8.3 and I see the following message, when 
>> the upgrade of the dn is done:
>>
>> [27/Sep/2011:07:57:22 +0000] - upgradedn NetscapeRoot: Index 
>> buffering is disabled./lib/dirsrv/slapd-ds/upgradednformat: line 59: 
>> 9661 Terminated ./ns-slapd upgradednformat -D /etc/dirsrv/slapd-ds -a 
>> $dir -n $be -N
>>
>> This happened for all of my databases.
>>
>> The server is up and running, but I was wondering what kind of impact 
>> this could have. More importantly, any idea why this happened.
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> -Reinhard
>>
>>
>> --
>> 389 users mailing list
>> 389-users at lists.fedoraproject.org
>> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users
>
>
> --
> 389 users mailing list
> 389-users at lists.fedoraproject.org
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/389-users/attachments/20110927/f903d313/attachment.html>


More information about the 389-users mailing list