[389-users] admserv_host_ip_check: ap_get_remote_host could not resolve

[Rich Megginson]

On 02/07/2012 03:23 PM, MATON Brett wrote:
>
> Hi Rich,
>
>   I tried this and got the following error :
>
> Enter LDAP Password:
>
> dn: cn=configuration,cn=admin-serv-<host>,cn=389 Administration Server,cn=
>
>  Server Group,cn=<fqdn>,ou=admins.unix,o=NetscapeRoot
>
> changetype: modify
>
> replace: nsAdminAccessAddresses nsAdminAccessHosts
>
> nsAdminAccessAddresses: *
>
> nsAdminAccessHosts:
>
> ldapmodify: wrong attributeType at line 4, entry 
> "cn=configuration,cn=admin-serv-<host>,cn=389 Administration 
> Server,cn=Server Group,cn=<fqdn>,ou=admins.unix,o=NetscapeRoot"
>
> Does this mean anything to you?
>
Yes, a typo on the wiki page.  I've updated the page.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Brett
>
> *De :*Rich Megginson [mailto:rmeggins at redhat.com]
> *Envoyé :* mardi 7 février 2012 15:18
> *À :* General discussion list for the 389 Directory server project.
> *Cc :* MATON Brett
> *Objet :* Re: [389-users] admserv_host_ip_check: ap_get_remote_host 
> could not resolve
>
> On 02/07/2012 01:05 AM, MATON Brett wrote:
>
> How can I stop admin server from logging theses messages?
>
> I realize from the console.conf file that the messages are created 
> because HostnameLookups is Off.
>
> My /etc/dirsrv.admin-serv/httpd.conf file has LogLevel set to warn, so 
> why is it logging notice messages?
>
> I'm probably overlooking some other configuration file somewhere.
>
> Any help appreciated
>
> As a side note, why is it whining about name resolution when the 
> configuration specifically says Don't do name lookups?
>
> http://directory.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Howto:AdminServerLDAPMgmt
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> *GreeNRB**
> */NRB considers its environmental responsibility and goes for green IT./
> /May we ask you to consider yours before printing this e-mail? /**
>
> *NRB, daring to commit
> */This e-mail and any attachments, which may contain information that 
> is confidential and/or protected by intellectual property rights, are 
> intended for the exclusive use of the above-mentioned addressee(s). 
> Any use (including reproduction, disclosure and whole or partial 
> distribution in any form whatsoever) of their content is prohibited 
> without prior authorization of NRB. If you have received this message 
> by error, please contact the sender promptly by resending this e-mail 
> back to him (her), or by calling the above number. Thank you for 
> subsequently deleting this e-mail and any files attached thereto./
>
>   
>   
> --
> 389 users mailing list
> 389-users at lists.fedoraproject.org  <mailto:389-users at lists.fedoraproject.org>
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> *GreeNRB
> */NRB considers its environmental responsibility and goes for green IT./
> /May we ask you to consider yours before printing this e-mail? /**
>
> *NRB, daring to commit
> */This e-mail and any attachments, which may contain information that 
> is confidential and/or protected by intellectual property rights, are 
> intended for the exclusive use of the above-mentioned addressee(s). 
> Any use (including reproduction, disclosure and whole or partial 
> distribution in any form whatsoever) of their content is prohibited 
> without prior authorization of NRB. If you have received this message 
> by error, please contact the sender promptly by resending this e-mail 
> back to him (her), or by calling the above number. Thank you for 
> subsequently deleting this e-mail and any files attached thereto./
>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/389-users/attachments/20120207/2f608cb4/attachment.html>