[389-users] Solaris 10 Clients without anonymous binds

Fri Mar 9 12:27:23 UTC 2012

Hi Carsten,

  I found a solution to my problem.

  I edited dse.ldif and set

require_secure_binds: on

allow_anonymous_access: on   (<- this is the default, I did have it set
off which works fine with openldap clients).

I then deleted the "Enable anonymous access" ACI:

aci: (targetattr != "userPassword") (version 3.0;acl "Enable anonymous
access";allow (read,compare,search)(userdn = "ldap:///anyone");)

and added

aci: (targetattr = "*") (version 3.0;acl "Allow Bound Users";allow
(read,compare,search,selfwrite)(userdn = "ldap:///all");)

It would appear that the dse.ldif option "allow_anonymous_binds: off"
stops all anonymous binds to anything, including the rootdse.

Thanks for your help all the same,

Brett

From: 389-users-bounces at lists.fedoraproject.org
[mailto:389-users-bounces at lists.fedoraproject.org] On Behalf Of Carsten
Grzemba
Sent: 09 March 2012 11:18
To: General discussion list for the 389 Directory server project.
Subject: Re: [389-users] Solaris 10 Clients without anonymous binds

ldapmodify -a -f <ldif> -D ...
is more recommended and
it not possible to put this aci in the dse.ldif directly.

Am 09.03.12, schrieb MATON Brett <Brett.Maton at nrb.be>:

Thanks again Carsten,

  To put the ACI's in the root do I need to edit
/etc/dirsrv/slapd<instance>/dse.ldif and add them there, or simply do an
ldapadd ?

Thanks Brett

From: 389-users-bounces at lists.fedoraproject.org
[mailto:389-users-bounces at lists.fedoraproject.org] On Behalf Of Carsten
Grzemba
Sent: 09 March 2012 09:51
To: General discussion list for the 389 Directory server project.
Subject: Re: [389-users] Solaris 10 Clients without anonymous binds

Hi,

so far I know the access to the nisdomain attribute is only necessary
for the Solaris LDAP Client so that it can pull and refresh the
configuration profile from LDAP-Server (refresh after TTL is expired
(default 1d)). It is a marker that where the nisdomain value matched, is
the right namingContex/BaseDN for search the profile. The profile is
located commonly in the ou=profile container and has the
objectclass=DUAConfigProfile.

But the ACI should be placed on the root entry dc=example,dc=com.

If you want to use the LDAP server Profile concept for Solaris Clients
you can run /usr/lib/ldap/idsconfig. 
There you must adjust the version checking, so that 389DS matches DS
5.2.  

Am 09.03.12, schrieb MATON Brett <Brett.Maton at nrb.be>:

I came across this link
https://blogs.oracle.com/jo/entry/anonymous_access_and_solaris_native

Which mentions adding the following ACL's:

the baseDN- (target = ldap:///dc=example,dc=com) (targetscope = base)
(targetattr="\*") (version 3.0; acl "anonymousBaseDN"; allow (read,
compare, search) (userdn = "ldap:///anyone") ;) .

For super secure access, this aci could be modified thus to only allow
access to thenisDomainattribute

(target = ldap:///dc=example,dc=com) (targetscope = base)
(targetattr="nisdomain") (version 3.0; acl "anonymousBaseDN"; allow
(read, compare, search) (userdn = "ldap:///anyone") ;) .

the profile container- (target = "ldap:///ou=profile,dc=example,dc=com")
(targetscope = subtree) (targetattr="\*") (version 3.0; acl
"anonymousProfile"; allow (read,compare,search) (userdn =
"ldap:///anyone") ;)

For super secure access, this aci could be modified thus to only allow
access to theproxyagent userobject

(target = "ldap:///cn=proxyagent,ou=profile,dc=example,dc=com")
(targetscope = subtree) (targetattr="\*") (version 3.0; acl
"anonymousProfile"; allow (all) (userdn = "ldap:///anyone") ;)

I just can't figure out where to put them, any help appreciated!

From: 389-users-bounces at lists.fedoraproject.org
[mailto:389-users-bounces at lists.fedoraproject.org] On Behalf Of MATON
Brett
Sent: 08 March 2012 14:39
To: General discussion list for the 389 Directory server project.
Subject: Re: [389-users] Solaris 10 Clients without anonymous binds

Hi Carsten,

  I'll give it ago, thanks.

Brett

From: 389-users-bounces at lists.fedoraproject.org
[mailto:389-users-bounces at lists.fedoraproject.org] On Behalf Of Carsten
Grzemba
Sent: 08 March 2012 14:34
To: General discussion list for the 389 Directory server project.
Subject: Re: [389-users] Solaris 10 Clients without anonymous binds

Hi,

I guess it must be able for the Solaris client to read at least the base
so the client can see the supported features:
# ldapsearch -h <ldapserver> -b "" -s base objectclass="*"
should return the supportedcontrols, etc.

Am 08.03.12, schrieb MATON Brett <Brett.Maton at nrb.be>:

I've got some hosts using Solaris 10

cat /etc/release

                      Solaris 10 10/09 s10s_u8wos_08a SPARC

           Copyright 2009 Sun Microsystems, Inc.  All Rights Reserved.

                        Use is subject to license terms.

                           Assembled 16 September 2009

Which I've configured with ldapclient manual (failed miserably until I
allowed anonymous binds in dse.ldif).

ldapclient manual -vv \

-a defaultSearchBase=<blah> \

-a defaultSearchScope=sub \

-a authenticationMethod=tls:simple \

-a credentialLevel=proxy \

-a proxyDN=cn=ldapsearch,cn=config \

-a proxyPassword=<blah> \

-a serviceAuthenticationMethod=pam_ldap:tls:simple \

-a domainName=<blah> \

-a certificatePath=/var/ldap \

-a serviceSearchDescriptor=group:ou=Groups,<blah> <389 server>

If I turn anonymous binds off once the client is configured, it fails to
connect because the Solaris client is still insisting on making
anonymous binds.

I'm getting these in my access log:

[08/Mar/2012:15:04:49 +0100] conn=1 fd=64 slot=64 SSL connection from
<Solaris 10> to <389 DS>

[08/Mar/2012:15:04:49 +0100] conn=1 SSL 128-bit RC4

[08/Mar/2012:15:04:49 +0100] conn=1 op=0 UNPROCESSED OPERATION -
Anonymous access not allowed

[08/Mar/2012:15:04:49 +0100] conn=1 op=0 RESULT err=48 tag=101
nentries=0 etime=0

[08/Mar/2012:15:04:49 +0100] conn=1 op=1 UNBIND

[08/Mar/2012:15:04:49 +0100] conn=1 op=1 fd=64 closed - U1

Anyone come across this before and have a solution?  I really don't want
to have to allow anonymous binds...

 Brett

-------------------------------------------------------------------

GreeNRB
NRB considers its environmental responsibility and goes for green IT. 
May we ask you to consider yours before printing this e-mail?  

NRB, daring to commit 
This e-mail and any attachments, which may contain information that is
confidential and/or protected by intellectual property rights, are
intended for the exclusive use of the above-mentioned addressee(s). Any
use (including reproduction, disclosure and whole or partial
distribution in any form whatsoever) of their content is prohibited
without prior authorization of NRB. If you have received this message by
error, please contact the sender promptly by resending this e-mail back
to him (her), or by calling the above number. Thank you for subsequently
deleting this e-mail and any files attached thereto.

-------------------------------------------------------------------

GreeNRB
NRB considers its environmental responsibility and goes for green IT. 
May we ask you to consider yours before printing this e-mail?  

NRB, daring to commit 
This e-mail and any attachments, which may contain information that is
confidential and/or protected by intellectual property rights, are
intended for the exclusive use of the above-mentioned addressee(s). Any
use (including reproduction, disclosure and whole or partial
distribution in any form whatsoever) of their content is prohibited
without prior authorization of NRB. If you have received this message by
error, please contact the sender promptly by resending this e-mail back
to him (her), or by calling the above number. Thank you for subsequently
deleting this e-mail and any files attached thereto.

--

-------------------------------------------------------------------

GreeNRB
NRB considers its environmental responsibility and goes for green IT. 
May we ask you to consider yours before printing this e-mail?  

NRB, daring to commit 
This e-mail and any attachments, which may contain information that is
confidential and/or protected by intellectual property rights, are
intended for the exclusive use of the above-mentioned addressee(s). Any
use (including reproduction, disclosure and whole or partial
distribution in any form whatsoever) of their content is prohibited
without prior authorization of NRB. If you have received this message by
error, please contact the sender promptly by resending this e-mail back
to him (her), or by calling the above number. Thank you for subsequently
deleting this e-mail and any files attached thereto.

-------------------------------------------------------------------
This e-mail and any attachments, which may contain information that is confidential and/or protected by intellectual property rights, are intended for the exclusive use of the above-mentioned addressee(s). Any use (including reproduction, disclosure and whole or partial distribution in any form whatsoever) of their content is prohibited without prior authorization of NRB. If you have received this message by error, please contact the sender promptly by resending this e-mail back to him (her), or by calling the above number. Thank you for subsequently deleting this e-mail and any files attached thereto.
-------------------------------------------------------------------

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/389-users/attachments/20120309/f260eabf/attachment.html>