[389-users] 389 vs Sun DS ldapmodify performance

[Rich Megginson]

On 05/23/2012 02:11 PM, Russell Beall wrote:
> I have not tried modrdn.
>
> Very early in my testing I thought I was seeing unbounded growth by 
> performing endless deletes (and re-adds).  That, I found out through 
> your much-appreciated responses to this list, was causing an explosion 
> in tombstone entries and thus the server was exploding in actual data 
> requirements.
>
> We don't actually place much importance on that use case because we 
> hardly ever delete an entry, so the housekeeping process for 
> tombstones is more than ample for that cleanup.
>
> The ldapmodify use case is critical to us however, because we perform 
> large quantities of ldapmodify operations every day.
>
> This memory growth situation I have described here applies 
> specifically and only to endless ldapmodify operations.

ok - please file a ticket at  https://fedorahosted.org/389

>
> Regards,
> Russ.
>
> On May 23, 2012, at 12:34 PM, Rich Megginson wrote:
>
>> Have you tried modrdn?  delete?  I was just wondering if the problem 
>> is specific to ldapmodify.
>
>
>
> --
> 389 users mailing list
> 389-users at lists.fedoraproject.org
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/389-users/attachments/20120523/c0183ea3/attachment.html>