[389-users] winsync: differences between 1.2.11.15 and 1.3
Rich Megginson
rmeggins at redhat.com
Fri Jul 19 14:15:52 UTC 2013
On 07/18/2013 11:46 PM, Juan Carlos Camargo wrote:
> Rich,
>
> Thanks for replying.
> The entry CN=XXXX is the same in both cases and inside the scope
> (inside the windows subtree). The agreements are the same in both servers:
Ok. Can you reproduce the problem with the Replication log level
enabled, then post your errors log showing the problem?
http://port389.org/wiki/FAQ#Troubleshooting
>
> v1.2.11.15
> dn: cn=ad5,cn=replica,cn=dc\3Dmetaeprinsa\2Cdc\3Dorg,cn=mapping
> tree,cn=config
> objectClass: top
> objectClass: nsDSWindowsReplicationAgreement
> description: ad5
> cn: ad5
> nsds7WindowsReplicaSubtree: dc=epr
> nsds7DirectoryReplicaSubtree: ou=usuarios,dc=metaeprinsa,dc=org
> nsds7NewWinUserSyncEnabled: on
> nsds7NewWinGroupSyncEnabled: off
> nsds7WindowsDomain: epr
> nsDS5ReplicaRoot: dc=metaeprinsa,dc=org
> nsDS5ReplicaHost: ad5.epr
> nsDS5ReplicaPort: 389
> nsDS5ReplicaBindDN: cn=metasync,ou=usuarios de servicio,ou=grupos,dc=epr
> nsDS5ReplicaBindMethod: SIMPLE
> nsDS5ReplicaCredentials: ****
> oneWaySync: fromWindows
>
> v1.3
> dn: cn=ad5,cn=replica,cn=dc\3Dmetaeprinsa\2Cdc\3Dorg,cn=mapping
> tree,cn=config
> objectClass: top
> objectClass: nsDSWindowsReplicationAgreement
> description: ad5
> cn: ad5
> nsds7WindowsReplicaSubtree: dc=epr
> nsds7DirectoryReplicaSubtree: ou=usuarios,dc=metaeprinsa,dc=org
> nsds7NewWinUserSyncEnabled: on
> nsds7NewWinGroupSyncEnabled: off
> nsds7WindowsDomain: epr
> nsDS5ReplicaRoot: dc=metaeprinsa,dc=org
> nsDS5ReplicaHost: ad5.epr
> nsDS5ReplicaPort: 389
> nsDS5ReplicaBindDN: cn=metasync,ou=usuarios de servicio,ou=grupos,dc=epr
> nsDS5ReplicaBindMethod: SIMPLE
> nsDS5ReplicaCredentials: ****
> oneWaySync: fromWindows
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> *De: *"Rich Megginson" <rmeggins at redhat.com>
> *Para: *"General discussion list for the 389 Directory server
> project." <389-users at lists.fedoraproject.org>
> *CC: *"Juan Carlos Camargo" <juancarlos at eprinsa.es>
> *Enviados: *Jueves, 18 de Julio 2013 16:01:52
> *Asunto: *Re: [389-users] winsync: differences between 1.2.11.15 and 1.3
>
> On 07/18/2013 06:17 AM, Juan Carlos Camargo wrote:
>
> Hi 389ers,
>
> I have a lab scenario with one server running version 1.3 on
> Fedora19. My production servers still use 1.2.11.15 and run on
> CentOS. I've created oneway sync agreements FROM Windows2003 , in
> both cases with the same params: windows sync user, windows host,
> ds subtree and windows subtree. But I've noticed that in version
> 1.3 sync does not work, all users are reported to be "out of
> scope" even when the same sAMAccountName/uid is found.
>
> Ex:
> v1.3
> "
> [18/Jul/2013:12:59:15 +0200] NSMMReplicationPlugin - agmt="cn=ad5"
> (ad5:389): windows_process_dirsync_entry: windows inbound entry
> CN=XXXX has the same name as local entry uid=XXXX but the windows
> entry is out of the scope of the sync subtree [dc=DOMAIN] - if you
> want these entries to be in sync, add the ntUser/ntGroup
> objectclass and required attributes to the local entry, and move
> the windows entry into scope
> "
>
> v1.2.11.15
>
> [18/Jul/2013:13:31:00 +0200] NSMMReplicationPlugin - agmt="cn=ad5"
> (ad5:389): map_entry_dn_inbound: looking for local entry matching
> AD entry [CN=XXXX]
> [18/Jul/2013:13:31:00 +0200] NSMMReplicationPlugin - agmt="cn=ad5"
> (ad5:389): map_entry_dn_inbound: looking for local entry by guid
> [155e86afca9f2141af71624d7f55a44c]
> [18/Jul/2013:13:31:00 +0200] NSMMReplicationPlugin - agmt="cn=ad5"
> (ad5:389): map_entry_dn_inbound: found local entry [uid=XXXX]
>
>
> Sorry about the different timestamps, but the user under XXXX was
> the same in both cases. So, same agreement in version 1.2.11.15
> syncs the users (from Windows always) perfectly. I've deleted and
> recreated the agreements in both sides, just in case I mispelled
> something,but still the same results. What has changed , or
> better, where did I go wrong?
>
>
> Can you post your winsync config?
> The AD entry CN=XXXX - is it in the windows subtree or outside of it?
> If it is outside of it, why?
>
>
> Regards!
>
> --
>
> Juan Carlos Camargo Carrillo.
> @jcarloscamargo
> 957-211157 , 650932877
>
>
>
>
> --
> 389 users mailing list
> 389-users at lists.fedoraproject.org
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users
>
>
>
>
>
> --
>
> Juan Carlos Camargo Carrillo.
> @jcarloscamargo
> 957-211157 , 650932877
>
>
>
> --
> 389 users mailing list
> 389-users at lists.fedoraproject.org
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/389-users/attachments/20130719/fe252da3/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: image/gif
Size: 14373 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/389-users/attachments/20130719/fe252da3/attachment.gif>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: image/gif
Size: 14373 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/389-users/attachments/20130719/fe252da3/attachment-0001.gif>
More information about the 389-users
mailing list