[389-users] COMPATIBILITY BETWEEN VERSIONS.
Rich Megginson
rmeggins at redhat.com
Tue Nov 5 14:12:50 UTC 2013
On 11/04/2013 07:52 PM, Ezequiel Larrarte wrote:
>
> No matter that they are different versions?
>
Yes. IMO, it would be very bad programming practice to change the
replication protocol to be incompatible in every major version. It
would make upgrades and interoperability a nightmare.
> On Nov 4, 2013 12:21 PM, "Rich Megginson" <rmeggins at redhat.com
> <mailto:rmeggins at redhat.com>> wrote:
>
> On 11/04/2013 08:16 AM, Ezequiel Larrarte wrote:
>>
>> Hi Rich, Can you be more specific?
>>
>> On Nov 4, 2013 11:49 AM, "Rich Megginson" <rmeggins at redhat.com
>> <mailto:rmeggins at redhat.com>> wrote:
>>
>> On 11/03/2013 05:15 AM, Ezequiel Larrarte wrote:
>>
>> Hi people ...
>>
>> Nowadays, I have CentOS5 on my servers, but next year I
>> ll start
>> setting up CentOS 6 on them.
>>
>> I ll first install 389DS on the main CentOS5 servers from
>> EPEL
>> repository (currently version 1.2.1) and I guess
>> replication between
>> them ll work fine because I m using the same version of
>> 389DS.
>>
>> The thing is that EPEL for CentOS 6 has 389DS version
>> 1.2.2 instead of 1.2.1.
>>
>> So, what would a safe way to migrate to a newer version
>> of 389DS?
>>
>> - Do I have to migrate all CentOS 5 servers participating
>> in the
>> replication process at the same time to CentOS 6?
>>
>> No.
>>
>
> All versions of 389/RHDS/CentOS DS can replicate with each other.
>
>> - How do you handle that kind of situations? Is there any
>> documentation I can read?
>>
>> Thanks!
>>
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/389-users/attachments/20131105/54fdbc65/attachment.html>
More information about the 389-users
mailing list